Dr. Magda Havas shows the strong evidence for electrosensitivity and the health risks of electromagnetic exposure caused by electrical appliances and the spread of wireless technologies.
For more info: MagdaHavas.com
The government?s response to the LG&E Report of 24 November 2009 is available from the link below. It is unbelievably arrogant and simply abysmal!
Where on earth did ?the government? get its advice? Where is the transparency and accountability? Who bears the costs of resulting harm- no doubt the communities who asked for more responsibly in the first place.
Whatever happened to listening to the communities who are affected?
The government?s response completely ignores the serious uncertainties in the NZS2772:1 1999 and that many European states have adopted a far more a precautionary approach with standards up to 1000 times more stringent than New Zealand. It ignored the warnings that are now widespread about unnecessary EMR exposures especially for children.
What influences have affected our government?s assessment of the risk of EMR and made them so different from the far more considered assessment of the EU, and many individual European states?
How did ?Big Brother? come to know more than the Select Committee members who listened to the people?
This is simply bizarre.
Sue
From: Pavan Sharma
Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2010 4:10 p.m.
Subject: Govt's response to cellphone tower report
Dear all,
Please find attached for your information a link to the Government's response to the Local Government and Environment Committee's recommendations on the cellphone tower petitions:
Pavan Sharma
Clerk of Committee
Local Government and Environment Committee
Select Committee Office
Room 10.10 Bowen House
DDI +64 4 817 9524
pavan.sharma@parliament.govt.nz http://www.parliament.nz
This should be especially true in the case of our children who are growing and developing at a rapid rate and yet are bombarded by electromagnetic radiation ...
Professor: Cell phone users are potentially "dialing up danger" WTEN
He is also a leading expert in the field of electromagnetic radiation, which is the energy emitted by cell phones. Dr. Carpenter claims there's a strong ...
It seems that electrosensivity, and later hyperelectrosensivity, were introduced by the WHO to make people responsible of this condition, instead of using microwave syndrome and radio frequency syndrome caused by environmental pollution.
In 1972, the NMRI published a report with 2311 referenced studies in the world, describing those syndromes. You can access it at: http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD750271
Olle Johansson, assoc. prof.
The Experimental Dermatology Unit
Department of Neuroscience
Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm
Sweden
&
Professor
The Royal Institute of Technology
100 44 Stockholm
Sweden
Combined Exposure of Peripubertal Male Rats to the Endocrine-Disrupting Compound Atrazine and Power-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Causes Degranulation of Cutaneous Mast Cells: A New Toxic Environmental Hazard?
Int J Public Health. 2009 Dec 18. [Epub ahead of print]
Kowall B, Breckenkamp J, Heyer K, Berg-Beckhoff G.
Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld, PO 100131, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
OBJECTIVES: The proportion of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany who assume health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMF) is assessed. Moreover, factors associated with this risk perception are examined.
METHODS: A 7% random sample was drawn from online lists of all the GPs working in Germany. 1,867 doctors received a long version of a self-administered postal questionnaire about EMF and health (response rate 23.3%), 928 doctors received a short version (response rate 49.1%).
RESULTS: 37.3% of responders to the short and 57.5% of responders to the long questionnaire agreed "that there are persons whose health complaints are caused by EMF when legal limit values are met". A late responder analysis for the survey with the short questionnaire led to a still lower estimate of 29% for GPs believing in health-relevant effects of EMF.
CONCLUSION: About a third of German GPs associate EMF with health complaints and thus deviate considerably from current scientific knowledge. To avoid a strong selection bias in the surveys of the perception of EMF risks, use of short questionnaires and late responder analysis are recommended.
PMID: 20020175 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
From: Enrico Grani
To: Iris Atzmon
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: Issues that the Cell Phone Tower NES has created for many communities in New Zealand.
I found this on the web from New Zealand. It is about cell phone transmitters on lamp posts, they are very ugly, devalue property and no doubt cause cancer. There are many links to scientific studies about EMR in this PDF.
Toa Greening from Manukau City has gone to much detail in writing this submission. I believe the submission provides insight to persons about how the system operates and how to write letters to Government, whom it is their duty to serve the health interests of the public and not to only cash up the cell phone Industry with tax payers rates etc.
Can you please kindly forward this to your contact list.
This interview in 15 parts can change your life when you really pay attention and are aware - your world view will probably transform during the 15 video parts.
This is an interview with the world known scientist assoc. professor Olle Johansson from the famous Karolinska Institute in Stockholm in Sweden and professor at The Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm too.
The question being discussed is about mobile phone radiation: Is it safe or is it not?
Independent researcher in consciousness (energy, frequency and vibration) Morten Julius from Denmark is interviewing the honourable Olle Johansson.
The Human Project has produced this interview and you can download documents and get to know more at
Damals wurde mit DECT-Telefonen untersucht, noch lange bevor Colony Collapse Disorder bekannt wurde. Der Grund war, dass man bei DECT-Telefonen leicht an ...
The head of a prominent cancer research institute issued an unprecedented warning to his faculty and staff Wednesday: Limit cell phone use because of the possible risk of cancer.
The warning from Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, is contrary to numerous studies that don?t find a link between cancer and cell phone use, and a public lack of worry by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Herberman is basing his alarm on early unpublished data. He says it takes too long to get answers from science and he believes people should take action now especially when it comes to children.
?Really at the heart of my concern is that we shouldn?t wait for a definitive study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather than sorry later,? Herberman said. ...
Cell Phone Use and Salivary...
https://noy.soundestlink.com/ce/v/6386724829e2d8001d105f53/6705774b06284babfed18ff5?signature=645f52a7600b24ac293a86261849ffd138e9059967daa9c98c8fb933f8724afe
More...
