Dr. Magda Havas shows the strong evidence for electrosensitivity and the health risks of electromagnetic exposure caused by electrical appliances and the spread of wireless technologies.
For more info: MagdaHavas.com
The government?s response to the LG&E Report of 24 November 2009 is available from the link below. It is unbelievably arrogant and simply abysmal!
Where on earth did ?the government? get its advice? Where is the transparency and accountability? Who bears the costs of resulting harm- no doubt the communities who asked for more responsibly in the first place.
Whatever happened to listening to the communities who are affected?
The government?s response completely ignores the serious uncertainties in the NZS2772:1 1999 and that many European states have adopted a far more a precautionary approach with standards up to 1000 times more stringent than New Zealand. It ignored the warnings that are now widespread about unnecessary EMR exposures especially for children.
What influences have affected our government?s assessment of the risk of EMR and made them so different from the far more considered assessment of the EU, and many individual European states?
How did ?Big Brother? come to know more than the Select Committee members who listened to the people?
This is simply bizarre.
From: Pavan Sharma
Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2010 4:10 p.m.
Subject: Govt's response to cellphone tower report
Please find attached for your information a link to the Government's response to the Local Government and Environment Committee's recommendations on the cellphone tower petitions:
It seems that electrosensivity, and later hyperelectrosensivity, were introduced by the WHO to make people responsible of this condition, instead of using microwave syndrome and radio frequency syndrome caused by environmental pollution.