Bürgerwelle News: Wissenschaft zu Mobilfunk

Wissenschaft zu Mobilfunk

3. Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)

This EMF can affect the fetus while in utero according to the latest research done in a Swiss laboratory. This research is fascinating and may hold a very important key.

Researchers covered a culture of mold in the laboratory. When they uncovered it and left it exposed to the ambient electromagnetic radiation in the laboratory (and just outside it) like the lights, computers, cell phones, and the cell phone tower located in close proximity to the lab, they discovered that the production of biotoxins in this culture increased more than 600 fold. It not only increased but it increased to a more virulent potent form of biotoxin.

Researchers, along with Dr. Klinghardt, have postulated that a pregnant mother who has low-grade infections in her body (non-symptomatic), and is exposed to significant electromagnetic radiation ? such as in the Swiss laboratory ? will have an increased and more potent form of biotoxin being produced in her body.

This radiation and consequent increased toxic insult has been shown to alter the DNA structure of the fetus, creating certain genetic alterations that can lead to the avalanche of neurodevelopmental problems we are seeing in births in the last 15 or 20 years.

Taken from - Causes of Autism and other Disorders on the Spectrum? To view the entire article, go to:

http://claybathsforkids.com/autism_causes.php

Informant: Martin Weatherall

--------

Induction of oncogen

Strangely, I found two old interesting studies in the publication:
Acupuncture & electro-therapeutics research.

Please, see:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1685623
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7684553

In the last one, abstract is truncated just before the cell phone results...

Too bad, huuu !

Philippe Hug
Chairman of ARA
http://www.alerte.ch

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+field
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+field
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=genetic+alteration
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=oncogen
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=autism
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=autism
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=spectrum+disorder
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Klinghardt
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Klinghardt
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Philippe+Hug
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Philippe+Hug

Starmail - 13. Feb, 07:15

12
Feb
2010

Largest worldwide biological experiment ever

Wayland Town Crier

The current scientific evidence (yes, it's peer-reviewed, weighty and alarming) has established proof of adverse biological effects from these RFR (and EMF) ...

http://www.wickedlocal.com/wayland/news/opinions/x503206150/Largest-worldwide-biological-experiment-ever

--------

The Largest Biological Experiment Ever
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1414390/

--------

Steeple for cell antennas?
http://www.wickedlocal.com/wayland/news/opinions/x503206150/Largest-worldwide-biological-experiment-ever

Informant: Martin Weatherall

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=biological+effect
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=biological+effect
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Christopher+Ketcham
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Martin+Blank
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Martin+Blank
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Cindy+Sage
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Johansson
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Johansson

Starmail - 12. Feb, 15:23

11
Feb
2010

The Impacts of Radiofrequency Radiation from Mobile Phone Antennas

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/bbab0dae42678d85

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=radiofrequency+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=radiofrequency+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Litovitz
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Litovitz
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Philippe+Hug
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Philippe+Hug

Starmail - 11. Feb, 08:33

9
Feb
2010

Cell Phones are Dangerous, But This May Be Far Worse

Cell Phones Are Dangerous, But This May Be Far Worse

http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2010/02/09/new-study-confirms-electrical-pollution-from-cell-phones-and-wifi-is-hazardous.aspx

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Mercola
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mercola

Starmail - 9. Feb, 13:10

Microwaves From Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells

http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1256

--------

Cell Tower not approved

April 2010

I think we are fortunate that our local government and school district is rather responsive to the community.

The school officials weren?t overly thoughtful at first, as they did not consult with the parents regarding the proposed cell tower, and in fact, if it weren?t for one parent who happened to notice a sign partially obscured by trees posted on a part of the campus that is not really used, it would have slipped by. Luckily we have a mom?s group with a great e-mail tree. She put an FYI email out to me and I sent emails out to the group with requests to pass it on to anyone who might want to be informed about it.

By the time she saw the sign and immediately emailed, we only had 2 days until the town council meeting (meanwhile many of us were very involved in our volunteer work for the school preparing for the big annual carnival which would be two days after the meeting). It was a very busy time, but approximately 7 of us (parents) showed up at the meeting thinking it would be basically informative (here is what is being proposed, etc.). We were surprised to see that it was not that kind of meeting at all. The matter, having supposedly met all legal requirements, was scheduled for rubber stamp approval, no discussion planned.

Luckily one of the council members recognized that we were there to discuss the issue and took it off the fast track part of the meeting where permits are approved and moved the issue to place the item further down the agenda with time for members of the community to be heard. No one in our group felt prepared and none of us were really at ease with speaking before the council (to add to the stage fright all our meetings are televised), however, I convinced them that, as only we 7 could come on such short notice, everyone needed to speak if we were going to get them to hold off until we could check on safety issues. So we did.

We spoke from the heart, and, for the most, part no one tried to claim knowledge that they didn?t have. We spoke out most about the lack of notice and consultation of the parents, the lack of certainty that placing the tower there would be safe for our kids. I pointed out on a map how close it would be to the preschool classes and preschool and kindergarten playground and how there were ongoing studies concerning possible health effects and that even the reports with the most positive spin admitted that there were cell changes and other effects, but that they had no "definite proof" that those would be adverse to one?s health. I reminded them that especially when it comes to children "no proof of harm" is not equal to "safe" and that they were our last line of defense.

We did not try to get them to deny the permit, but rather to put it off for 30 days so that we could research the safety issues because we hadn?t had adequate time. It turned out that the Chair of the permit committee had a child going to the school and this was the first he had heard of it too. They rescheduled for 30 days, and when we left the employee of Clearwire who was responsible for choosing the site of the tower spoke to us in the lobby and scheduled a meeting on site in 20 days (he promised to have an RF engineer there to answer questions as he knew nothing of the technical data and in fact gave us some incorrect information about the part he thought he knew). Unbeknownst to us, an official from the school district was at the council meeting and went back to inform her superior about our concerns. There was also a reporter from the Arizona Republic there and he requested information and in fact published a story on the matter within a day or two. The fact is, he spun it a bit against us (focused on the one or two individuals who got a bit emotional and took their quotes out of context) but it still helped get the word out.

We knew that we had better make fast work of our research and let other parents know what was being proposed. A few of the parents prepared and passed out flyers with a strictly unbiased message (e.g. Here is what is being proposed. Here are the meeting dates. Get informed/ Come be heard). Others of us added to our pile of daily duties the job of trying to get a crash course on cell towers and research findings on bio-effects. We requested the help of an engineer parent whose spouse was very pro-tower as it meant money for the school which in our economy is really needed (although it turned out that money received from the proposed tower would have been used mostly for an electronic marquis as money for teachers comes from a different kind of funding). That is one thing to keep in mind. Many of these school sites are being touted as money for the school when it really needs it as if to imply it might help avert teacher layoffs, when it seems for the most part that is not true. Most schools have very structured funding guidelines.

We kept researching and passing on information to everyone concerned. We maintained the attitude of "it?s too unclear whether it is safe" as opposed to the hard line of "it is unsafe" because we knew we could not prove it unsafe (too much controversy) and would therefore be dismissed, but that they could not argue that there was a clear answer that it was safe, unless they could find something that we had not been able to, and so the onus was on them. We reminded them that medical research often lags several years behind many of these new products ? smoking was given as an example with pictures of old ads with doctors touting the great benefits of smoking. We told them that we didn?t want to be 10 years down the line apologizing to hundreds of children for our oversight. We kept a respectful, searching, attitude of, ?we know we all want what is best for the children? and very quickly the school district decided that they would table the matter indefinitely, cancel the meeting and send out a notice that the matter was not going to be pursued.

The engineer parent was also trying to be very through and asked many technical questions of the Town Planning and Development Community, Clearwire and the FCC. The matter was actually tabled before he had completed his research. However, he took meter readings at various locations around our town and neighboring cities and made calculations and prepared a really great presentation which showed that the tower should emit far, far less than the FCC limits even taking in worst case scenario like multiple instances of reflection and that people would be 7 ft. tall and be standing on the roof of the school. We thanked him sincerely for his hard work and for providing the information. I told him I felt that he his research did seem to show that the levels would be far lower than allowed, but that I was still concerned whether FCC standards were sufficient and about possible cumulative effects.

I really appreciate the information you sent, I shared it with the others looking into the matter. I will tell you much of it was semi dismissed by the a representative of the FCC (as one might have predicted) as either opinion or non-reliable based on bias, specifically regarding Bio-Initiative: "the stated purpose of the Bioinitiative Report (BIR) is "to document the reasons why current public exposure standards for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation are no longer good enough to protect public health." Thus, it is argued by four expert groups (in addition to COMAR) that the BIR is an advocacy document, which presents no new information, and which does not provide a dispassionate, scientific overview."

The report from Dr. Belyaev did garner more interest though as it was acknowledged that he was a very reputable and knowledgeable in the field.

Overall, I think the information collected including that which you sent really helped us illustrate that it was too speculative to allow the tower to go up at the school (partially because we were standing on the ground that there was too little certainty rather then that we were certain there was harm). Many of us even stated we would love to have reliable evidence that it was safe, not only so the school could have the funds, but because clearly we and our children are increasingly exposed almost everywhere we go. Unfortunately, our research did not support that desire.

Thank you again and I hope this information will be helpful.

Stephanie Cox

Informant: Martin Weatherall

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=microwaves
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=microwaves
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=53BP1
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=stem+cells
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=stem+cells
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Bioinitiative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Bioinitiative
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Belyaev
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Belyaev
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Cindy+Sage
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage

Starmail - 9. Feb, 09:07

BRAIN TUMORS DONT LIE

Starmail - 9. Feb, 05:49

8
Feb
2010

Zellforschung mit Niederfrequenz

Aus: HLV Info 013

ElektrosmogReport Februar 2010

16/Nr.2

Zellforschung mit Niederfrequenz

DNA-Schädigung durch 50-Hz-Magnetfelder bestätigt

Auszug:

Da viele Ergebnisse von Experimenten zu DNA-Schädigung durch elektromagnetische Felder oft nicht reproduzierbar waren, wurden menschliche primäre Fibroblasten 50-Hz-Felder von 1 mT ausgesetzt, um die Frage zu klären, ob, und wenn wie niederfrequente Felder die DNA schädigen können. Die Experimente waren Wiederholungen von früheren Arbeiten von Ivancits und Mitarbeitern. Nach diesen Ergebnissen führen gepulste, nicht kontinuierliche Feldeinwirkungen zu DNA-Schädigung.

?Die Experimente legen nahe, dass der Zellzyklus durch Magnetfelder bei der Replikation der DNA gestört wird?

?Es lässt sich also festhalten, dass frühere Ergebnisse von Ivancits und Mitarbeiter bestätigt werden können?

Quelle: Focke F, Schürmann D, Kuster N, Schär P (2010): DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremly low frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Mutation Research 683, 74-83

[ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19896957 ]

Mehr?

ElektrosmogReport 16/Nr.2

Mobilfunkforschung

Mobilfunkwirkung auf periphere Monozyten

Auszug:

Zellkulturen von peripheren Monozyten aus dem Blut von Freiwilligen zeigten nach Bestrahlung mit verschiedenen Funkfrequenzen, dass die Adhäsionsfähigkeit der Zellen durch die elektromagnetischen Felder beeinflusst wird. Das könnte ein Grund für eine Beeinträchtigung des Immunsystems sein. Die anderen untersuchten Parameter zeigten kaum Unterschiede.

?Aus diesen Ergebnissen wird geschlossen, dass die elektromagnetischen Felder die Adhäsionsfähigkeit der Monozyten vermindern und dadurch eine veränderte Immunreaktion bedingen können?

Anmerkung: Monozyten sind als sogenannte Non-Responder bekannt, es sind Zellen, die nicht oder kaum durch elektromagnetische Felder beeinflusst werden. Zu dieser Arbeit hat ATI, eine internationale Telekommunikationsfirma mit Sitz in Kanada, einen Beitrag geleistet, so steht es am Ende der Arbeit.

Quelle:

Atosoy A, Sevim Y, Kaya I, Yilmaz M, Durmus A, Sonmez M, Omay SB, Ozdemir F, Ovali E (2009): The effects of electromagnetic fields on peripheral Blood mononuclear cells in vitro.

Bratislava Medical Journal 110 (9), 526-529

[ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19827334 ]

Mehr..

ElektrosmogReport 16/Nr. 2

Schweizer Bundesamt für Umwelt bestätigt Krebs durch niederfrequente Magnetfelder

?Krebs durch niederfrequente Magnetfelder: Verdacht bleibt bestehen? ? so lautet die Überschrift einer Pressemitteilung des Schweizer Bundesamtes für Umwelt (BAFU).

In dieser Veröffentlichung vom 19. Januar 2010 gibt das Amt bekannt, dass niederfrequente Magnetfelder das Potenzial besitzen, Krebs zu erzeugen. Zu dieser Einschätzung kam die Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO im Jahr 2007, und neue in dem Bericht zusammengefasste Untersuchungen haben diese Einschätzung bestätigt. Somit erhärtet sich der seit etwa 30 Jahren bestehende Verdacht nun einmal mehr. Es besteht demnach weiterhin ein erhöhtes Leukämierisiko bei Kindern, die Magnetfeldbelastungen von über 0,3 bis 0,4 Mikro T zu Hause über einen langen Zeitraum ausgesetzt sind. Für andere Krebsarten bei Kindern und Krebs bei Erwachsenen kann man keine Aussage machen, so die Autoren, ebenso nicht für Personen mit höherer Magnetfeldbelastung am Arbeitsplatz. In Tierexperimenten wurden bisher keine Tumor auslösende Wirkung der Magnetfeldexposition beobachtet, aber aus Zellexperimenten ergeben sich Hinweise, dass niederfrequente Magnetfelder die Wirkung bekannter Krebs erzeugender Stoffe verstärken können.

Die Autoren geben an:

?Ein plausibler Wirkungsmechanismus, der diese Befunde erklären könnte, ist nicht bekannt.?

Als Schlussfolgerung geben die Autoren an, das Vorsorge in Hinsicht auf das Leukämierisiko gerechtfertigt ist und somit die Langzeitbelastung mit niederfrequenten Feldern zu vermindern ist. Dazu heißt es: Vorgeschrieben werden?vorsorgliche Maßnahmen zur Verringerung der Magnetfelder in der Umgebung von Hochspannungsleitungen und Transformatorenstationen?. Jedoch gibt es keinen Grund, die Grenzwerte zu senken. Und: ?Ein plausibler Wirkungsmechanismus, der diese Befunde erklären könnte , ist nicht bekannt.? Der 120-seitige Bericht ?Niederfrequente Magnetfelder und Krebs? basiert auf Auswertungen von 2008 und steht als Download zur Verfügung unter http://www.bafu.admin.ch/publikationen .
[ http://www.bafu.admin.ch/publikationen/publikation/01511/index.html?lang=de&download=NHzLpZig7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1acy4Zn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCGd3t5fmym162dpYbUzd,Gpd6emK2Oz9aGodetmqaN19XI2IdvoaCVZ,s-.pdf ]

Starmail - 8. Feb, 17:21