We claim that the BBC acted in a most inappropriate and rude manner by posting on-screen comments during Mr Tom Watson's Adjournment Debate in the House of Commons on 20th December 2010. These comments, some of which were factually incorrect, contradicted the valid concerns being expressed on behalf of the public by the two MPs. The adversarial comments were displayed to the nation while the MPs were actually speaking. We see this as blatant lobbying by a news organisation. The MPs would not have been aware of the comments.

Click here for the full news story

--------

Complaint sent to BBC misguided reporting on Tom Watson's Adjournment Debate

I?ve successfully posted a complaint to the BBC.

Copy of my complaint below.


Eileen O?Connor


I am lost for words after viewing evidence provided by Powerwatch UK demonstrating the BBC?s bias reporting and blatant disregard for Tom Watson?s Adjournment Debate on mobile phones and health in the House of Commons on 20th December, 2010. I am calling for the BBC to apologise to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Anne Milton, MPs Tom Watson, Bill Esterson and the public they represent. Download full report here: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20110107-bbc-complaint-parliament-live.asp

MPs Tom Watson, Bill Esterson and The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Anne Milton) would not have been aware of the misguided comments displayed on the monitor which did not reflect the debate.

I am a member of Labour MP Bill Esterson?s constituency. He kindly represented serious concerns with regards to compelling evidence in connection to the dangers of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone handsets and phone masts. He also raised valid and serious concerns about children after reviewing evidence provided by the EM Radiation Research Trust.

I question the BBC?s vested interests and misuse of licence/tax payer?s money to lobby Government while using underhanded reporting to undermine a very serious health debate on mobile phones and phone masts.

The BBC did not reflect on the debate or promote official advice from the Department of Health leaflet which clearly states that children and young people under 16 should be discouraged for non-essential calls. In the light of this recommendation the UK Chief Medical Officers strongly advise that where children and young people do use mobile phones, they should be encouraged to use mobile phones for essential purposes only keep all calls short - talking for long periods prolongs exposure and should be discouraged. The UK CMOs recommend that if parents want to avoid their children being subject to any possible risk that might be identified in the future, the way to do so is to exercise their choice not to let their children use mobile phones.

http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4123981.pdf

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Anne Milton responded to concerns raised by Tom Watson and Bill Esterson , she said ?I am aware of the ability of large and powerful vested interests to lobby, often very successfully. There are, without doubt, eye-wateringly large amounts of money at stake in the mobile communications industry. I assure the hon. Gentleman that I am old enough and cynical enough to apply at all times an appropriate level of scrutiny and cynicism to all information that comes my way-always seeking to find out whence it came and who paid for it?. I will be drawing the BBC?s reporting of this debate to Ann Minton?s attention and encourage her to review the BBC?s privileged position with regards to reporting on Parliamentary proceedings while trying to influence the democratic process with misguided information.

I call on the BBC to alert MPs and the general public and especially our children to the precautionary advice from the Department of Health in order to help protect future generations from what could turn out to be another public health disaster. I highly recommend the BBC review the evidence from independent scientists and public health officials/advocates. Please read the report ?Cell phones and Brain Tumours: 15 Reasons for Concern?.

http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/15reasons.asp

I am the Director for the UK EM Radiation Research Trust charity. I will be drawing this serious disregard and misuse of broadcasting to the attention of fellow Radiation Research Trust trustees Joe Benton, Labour MP and Dr Caroline Lucas, Green Party MP. Trustee members of the European Parliament are Liz Lynne, Lib Democrat MEP, and Jill Evans, Plaid Cymru Member for the European Parliament for Wales. Other members are Devon based Scots Lawyer and environmentalist, Michael Bell, Graham Philips, Powerwatch UK, Dr Ian Gibson, doctorate in biochemistry and previous member of Parliament and Chairman Brian Stein, Chief Executive Samworth Brothers Ltd.


Yours faithfully,

Eileen O?Connor
Director
EM Radiation Research Trust
http://www.radiationresearch.org



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=exposure
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=exposure
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=precaution
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=precaution
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=public+health
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=public+health
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=children
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=children
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Tom+Watson

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/dc2ca3812a955d4



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Lobby
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Gladiß
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Gladiß

Rechtzeitig vor der Entscheidung der Österreichischen Agentur für Wissenschaftliche Integrität hat das industrieeigene österreichische Forum Mobilkommunikation noch einmal Prof. Alexander Lerchls ...



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Lerchl
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Lerchl
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Adlkofer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Adlkofer

GOOGLE TRANSLATION:

MOBILE RADIATION

Radiation Safety SSM does not handle the issue of mobile phone risks according to the requirement of impartiality. SSM uses biased experts who defend an outdated threshold of great economic importance to the industry. The Authority's handling of the issue urgently needs to be exposed to scrutiny. It writes the journalist and author Mona Nilsson.

Radiation Safety SSM does not handle the issue of mobile phone risks according to the requirement of impartiality. SSM uses biased experts who defend an outdated threshold of great economic importance to the industry.

The Authority's handling of the issue urgently needs to be exposed to scrutiny. Radiation Safety SSM recently held a seminar in Stockholm where the Authority's alleged "independent" experts would provide information on what the latest research showed the risks of mobile telephony. However, they are far from independent.

A majority is now like the last eight years, members of the controversial organization ICNIRP. Most can also research funds from the mobile industry, in some cases significant amounts. SSM boycotting all those scientists who believe that there are risks associated with mobile telephony.

The Authority therefore ignore its obligation under the Constitution to remain objective and impartial. ICNIRP is behind the current standard for mobile telephony by mobile industry adapted its technology to. The day a health risk with mobile telephony becomes widely recognized, will the important threshold to fall. Fall limit hit industry hard: It results in increased costs, reduced use and circulation, and increases the risk of costly litigation. It simply is of immense importance for the industry: a turnover of 3 trillion dollars annually is in the balance when the risk assessment.

Mobile industry and the ICNIRP-experts have a common interest in denying the mobile radiation health risks, as there are many examples. ICNIRP members dismisses year after year all the research data on risks in their own limit. ICNIRP-experts dominate teams not only in Sweden but also in Europe and the WHO. The limit is heavily criticized for being outdated and does not not fit with the extensive use and passive radiation exposure today.

It explicitly protects only against the immediate effects of very short-term exposure (6 minutes), and excludes long-term effects such as cancer. The Expert Group on SSM was established in June 2002 by the SSM's former director general Lars-Erik Holm, who is now director general of the National Board, a month before the researcher Lennart Hardell was expected to present evidence that cell phone use increased the risk of brain tumors. While there was a notable process in the U.S. where the neurologist Christopher Newman, who blamed his brain tumor on the phone, called mobilinudstrin of 800 million U.S. dollars. Lennart Hardell results could have a crucial bearing on the question of the risks of mobile phones and for similar processes in the courts in the future.

Years have passed and each year has the ICNIRP-dominated group of experts submitted their report which Hardell and all other research showing the health risks of mobile telephony was dismissed. Some members of the group have stopped, but they are immediately replaced by other ICNIRP-experts. The group is headed now, as in 2002 by Anders Ahlbom, who established the ICNIRP maximum and the Secretary is still ICNIRP member Maria Feychting. Both participated in the large international study, largely funded by the mobile industry, the risk of brain tumors from cell phone use has finally announced last spring. The researchers then had fought for four years about how the mobile industry decisive results would be presented. ICNIRP-faction won the battle for the official conclusion: No risk of brain tumors. The elevated risk observed for current normal users were discarded.

The most alarming analysis, in which elevated risk was seen with increased use and increased latency so-called dose-response curves, relegated to an appendix. Maria Feychting presented the new findings on the SSM seminar. As in May, she claimed that the increased risk could not be taken seriously, because there was no clear dose-response curve. Feychting showed a flat line, representing a reduced risk of brain tumors: - We saw no increased risk in the first nine exposure categories, the risk was seen only in the most extreme user category, explained Feychting. The increased risk meant she was due to reporting errors. She felt that it is unlikely that any of those who had brain tumors were used cell phone more than 1 hour a day. Maria Feychting did not explain that the first nine exposure categories are represented as low exposure, if we turn it on ten years of use, no increased risk could be expected. The first seven categories had only used the phone for 0.1 to 6 minutes per day. That and Feychting 'normal' use of "extreme" and instead very low use of "normal" is a perverse use of language. Some would call it manipulation.

It is interesting to ask Feychting arguments in relation to a court ruling in Italy in 2009. The Court held that a man who used a mobile phone and wireless phone received the tumor due to the intense use. The Italian court decision is not based on opinions but on the details of the man's use of the work. Moreover, the Court took note of Lennart Hardell results which were judged most reliable. Hardell has shown that the cell phone and the cordless phone increases the risk of brain tumors in adults, a clear trend in which the risk increases with increased use, and that the risk is even higher for young people (up to eight times higher).

Feychting their part, ignoring Hardell resultaten with the only explanation that they show a higher risk than she showed. Unlike SSM experts believe Israel's representative in the WHO study, Professor Siegal Sadetzki and the study's project leader, Professor Elisabeth Cardis, that shows elevated risks. Sadetzki has recently led an expert study in Israel, which culminated in a parliamentary proposal for a comprehensive action to reduce school children's exposure to mobile phone radiation and she recommends with the country's health ministry to avoid the use of wireless telephones.

A few days after SSM seminar, I see a news program from the U.S. where a heartbroken father says his son died of brain cancer, only 28 years old. He had reviewed the invoices from your carrier. The son had used mobile phones for up to 10 hours a day. Yet a week later, a report in the Australian TV. A 27-year-old woman has been a life-threatening tumor right where she used to keep the phone for 2-3 hours each day. Excessive! , the Swedish experts say. Radiation Safety Authority have all other authorities pressure to respond objectively and impartially. Swedish people's exposure to mobile phone radiation, both from base stations and their phones have exploded only in the past five years, while research shows that serious risks are high.

That a significantly biased group of experts, may autocratic rule in question is offensive and clearly inconsistent with the requirement of objectivity. It is high time that the SSM's handling of the mobile communications risks examined.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mona Nilsson
Swedish authorities are lying about Mobile phone health risks

Read more http://svtdebatt.se/2010/11/svenska-myndigheter-ljuger-om-riskerna-med-mobiltelefoni/


Mona Nilsson
http://www.monanilsson.se
http://monanilsson.wordpress.com/


Mona Nilsson's new article plus the response from the Radiation Safety Authority. It is so interesting the words they choose:

1) "of course" we do not lie.
2) direct funding vs. indirectfunding- indirect used as a protection. It just sharpens the problem.
3) scientific basis and how it is looked at
4) risk assessment- used as a tool to delete studies?
5) warming effects- how many years can this go on?

What should the next step be?

Iris Atzmon

google translation

The authorities continue to lie about mobile risks and treasury experts

Published December 4, 2010 - 18:08

MOBILE RADIATION Lars Mjönes from Radiation Safety writing on 30 November that the researchers included in the Radiation Safety scientific advice "do not receive research funding directly from the telecom company". [it is like claimingthat it goes indirectly,in order to not admit the connection to industry...how transparent can a person be?..]It is wrong. Experts in the SSM's scientific advice may be many years, research funds, directly or indirectly, from mobile and electrical industries. Writes journalist Mona Nilsson.

SSM's expert Bernard Veyret has received funding directly from, and is a consultant to, the mobile industry for many years. Veyret always publishes results that are favorable to them: no effects. When he was in a study, as well as the Swedish research group in Lund, saw that the brain was injured he had to stop publication of the results of the false statement that it was a small pilot study. In the light of their connections to the mobile industry, he was not fit to participate in France's equivalent of experts.

SSM expert during 2003-2009 Leeka Kheifets has for years received money and also worked at the U.S. electricity industry organization, EPRI. Maria Feychting also gets research funding directly from EPRI. All these three and the team, Anders Ahlbom, members of the ICNIRP, which is claimed to be independent from industry.

The latter is an equally important aspect of research funding: The majority of experts are members of the ICNIRP, which established the controversial outdated values which are of immense importance for the mobile industry. This is a disturbing conflict of interest.

Even more outrageous is that none of all the experts and scientists who believes that there are health risks found in SSM's experts. SSM boycotting both their expertise as the research evidence that radiation harms humans, animals and cells. An example is Lennart Hardell alarming results show that young mobile users are at high risk brain tumors.

Mjönes claiming falsely that "limit protects against all known health effects" and that "the only health effect it could find, so far at least, is acute warming effect." [for how many years from now is he planning to continue say this no matter what he can find on Medline?] I encourage everyone to check the facts: the ICNIRP limit specifically excludes long-term effects such as cancer. It is proven over and over and over again that radiation harms people, animals and cells at levels well below this threshold. Among other things, a dozen studies have shown that sperm damaged by mobile phone radiation. Course of study have shown that radiation disrupts sleep, causing oxidative stress and DNA damage. This list could be much longer.

Mjönes also asserts that "for the low exposure levels caused by transmitters such as cell towers, wireless networks, radio and television are not scientifically well-founded doubts about the health effects". Here mislead him in the square: It is not "low levels" from cell towers and wireless networks and more. There are high levels when compared with the maximum value recommended by a large group of critical experts. It is "low" only if that Mjönes compare with ICNIRP's soaring value, which does not protect against the effects of the shape of the exposure in question: for a long time.

8 of 10 studies show that cell towers, the incidence of mikrovågssyndromet (sleep problems, headaches, cardiac arrhythmias, etc.) and cancer among the local residents. Meanwhile, the testimony of these health effects are very comprehensive and consistent.

Mjönes also asserts that the same assessments that SSM does is done all over the world, including the WHO. He does not mention that the WHO has been paid by the mobile industry for many years and to work piquant enough, led by the ICNIRP members who dominate the SSM's experts. Several other countries are doing other risk assessments. For example, France has banned mobile phones in school, many countries have lowered the limits. Experts in Israel proposes comprehensive measures to reduce children's exposure. German and Finnish children SSM is to minimize the mobile use.

SSM violates its duty to behave impartially and objectively, and the requirement of objectivity. Year after year, SSM lied about what is known about the risks, children's sensitivity and the limit and used the services of biased experts. It's time to clean up, both at the agency as among the experts. I urge the Swedish journalists to review the SSM.

Mona Nelson, journalist and author of the book "mobile radio health risks - facts about today's biggest environmental and health scandal"


Lars Mjönes, investigators in the Radiation Safety Authority is respondingto Mona Nilsson:

We do not lie on mobile radiation
Published November 30, 2010 - 18:00

MOBILE RADIATION The researchers included in the Radiation Safety scientific advice must all submit jävsdeklarationer and they do not accept research funding directly from the telecom companies. Mona Nilsson accuses Radiation Safety Authority of lying about the risks of mobile telephony. Of course we do not do it, writes Lars Mjönes, investigators in the Radiation Safety

Mona Nilsson accuses Radiation Safety Authority of lying about the risks of mobile telephony. Of course we do not do it. [without second thought] We follow the research and knowledge in the field and do a risk assessment based on the state of scientific knowledge. In the case of mobile phone use, we apply the precautionary principle. Since 2004 we have, among other things recommended the use of hands to reduce unnecessary exposure in talks with mobile phone. The reason is that there is a scientifically based suspicion of possible health effects for those who use mobile phones for more than 10 years. The suspicion is admittedly weak, but has not yet been dismissed. Caution with the mobile phone is important for everyone but is especially important for children and young people because they will use mobile phone for a long time. For the low exposure levels caused by transmitters such as cell towers, wireless networks, radio and television are not scientifically well-founded doubts about the health effects.

Mona Nilsson also says that researchers in the Radiation Safety scientific advice would be the telecom industry matters. It is of course not. It is now very rare for serious researchers, in the case studies on health risks, receiving research money directly from companies. In the research on possible health risks of mobile telephony has been implemented in several countries, governments have contributed half the money and the industry by half. Research money is then distributed by an independent commission, just to avoid the possibility that scientists will be in a position of dependence on industrial firms. The researchers included in the Radiation Safety scientific advice must all submit jävsdeklarationer and they do not accept research funding directly from the telecom companies.

She also tackles the International Commission on Radiological Protection for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Their task is to monitor research regarding health risks and, if necessary, amend its guidelines. Nilsson says that the current limit, which ICNIRP updated in 2009, only to "protect against acute effects". Wrong again. The limit protects against all known health effects. The only health effect it could find, so far at least, is acute warming effect. The limit protects against these, one can hardly ask for a limit to protect against unknown health effects.

The Radiation Safety risk assessments will be shared by virtually all radiation safety authorities worldwide, including the responsible authority in the U.S. and the World Health Organization.


Lars Mjönes, investigators in the Radiation Safety

"How is it possible that the Swedish (and Finnish) people has such a club to decide on children's health?"
Solveig Silverin

Very good question indeed.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mona Nilsson
To: Iris Atzmon
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 12:06 PM
Subject: new article as reply to the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority


SVT Debatt: Slutreplik: Mona Nilsson om mobilstrålning
Myndigheterna fortsätter ljuga om mobilrisker och köpta experter
Publicerad 4 december, 2010 - 18:08

MOBILSTRÅLNING Lars Mjönes från Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten skriver den 30 november att de forskare som ingår i Strålsäkerhetsmyndighetens vetenskapliga råd ?inte tar emot forskningsanslag direkt från telekomföretag?. Det är fel. Experter i SSM:s vetenskapliga råd får sedan många år forskningsmedel direkt eller indirekt från mobil- och elindustrin. Det skriver journalisten Mona Nilsson.

The new article: http://svtdebatt.se/2010/12/myndigheterna-fortsatter-ljuga-om-mobilrisker-och-kopta-experter/

My first article:
Svenska myndigheter ljuger om riskerna med mobiltelefoni http://svtdebatt.se/2010/11/svenska-myndigheter-ljuger-om-riskerna-med-mobiltelefoni/

The SSM reply http://svtdebatt.se/2010/11/vi-ljuger-inte-om-mobilstralningen/



More about the theme:

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=mobile+phone+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=mobile+phone+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=exposure
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=exposure
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=health+risk
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+risk
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=children
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=children
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=oxidative+stress
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=oxidative+stress
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=DNA+damage
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=DNA+damage
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=cancer
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=brain+tumor
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumor
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=headache
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=headache
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=ICNIRP
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=World+Health+Organi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organi
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=mobile+industry
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=mobile+industry
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=neurologist
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=neurologist
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Christopher+Newman
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Lars-Erik+Holm
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Anders+Ahlbom
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Anders+Ahlbom
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Maria+Feychting
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Maria+Feychting
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Leeka+Kheifets
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Leeka+Kheifets
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Bernard+Veyret
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Bernard+Veyret
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Hardell
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Sadetzki
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sadetzki
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Elisabeth+Cardis
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Elisabeth+Cardis
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Mona+Nilsson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mona+Nilsson

tt.com

Helsinki (APA) - Der finnische Handyhersteller Nokia ist durch einen neuen Dokumentarfilm des Dänen Frank Poulsen erneut unter Verdacht geraten, trotz gegenteiliger Behauptungen so genannte Blutmineralien aus dem Kongo in seinen Produkten zu verwenden. Poulsen stellte seinen Film ?Blood In The Mobile? (Blut im Handy) vergangene Woche auf dem Dokumentarfilmfestival in Amsterdam vor. Darin geht es um das seltene Mineral Coltan, das hauptsächlich in dem zentralafrikanischen Land abgebaut wird. ...

http://www.tt.com/csp/cms/sites/tt/Nachrichten/NachrichtenTicker/1717526-53/d%C3%A4nischer-film-bringt-nokia-wieder-unter-blutmineralien-verdacht.csp

--------

Premiere in Germany - Blutige Handys (German title) - on WDR Monday November 29th at 22:00

http://bloodinthemobile.org/the-film/watch-the-film/

http://www.wdr.de/programmvorschau/object4Broadcast.jsp?broadcastId=3541920


Nachricht von Martin Kempf

--------

Heute im WDR-Fernsehen ?Blutige Handys? Ein Film von Frank Piasecki Poulsen

Montag, 29. November 2010, 22.00 - 22.45 Uhr .

Donnerstag, 02. Dezember 2010, 14.15 - 15.00 Uhr (Wdh.).

Für die Produktion von Handys braucht man spezielle Mineralien, wie Coltan. Coltan wird im Ostkongo oft von Kindern aus ungesicherten Minen geholt.

Das Geld aus dem Verkauf finanziert einen Krieg, der schon 15 Jahre dauert und bis heute fünf Millionen Menschen getötet hat. Von all dem wollen die Mobilfunkunternehmen nichts wissen.

Der Autor Frank Piasecki Poulsen hat sich für die story auf eine lebensgefährliche Suche in die Coltan-Minen im Kongo gemacht. Er ist in eine Mine hinabgestiegen, in der Kinder oft Tage in den dunklen Tunneln graben und leben. Der Lohn: ein paar Cent. Die Gewinne aus dem Geschäft mit Coltan stecken andere ein. Poulsen konfrontiert Mobilfunkunternehmen mit seinen Aufnahmen und Erfahrungen.

Er fragt, wer von den katastrophalen Bedingungen weiß, wer damit einen Krieg finanziert und warum dagegen nichts getan wird. die story zeigt die erschreckende Wirklichkeit der Handy-Produktion.

Redaktion: Barbara Schmitz

Autor: Frank Piasecki Poulsen

Siehe:

http://www.wdr.de/tv/diestory/sendungsbeitraege/2010/1129/handys.jsp .


Frank Ermisch

--------

Goldader hinterm Klingelton - Edelmetalle im Handy

suedkurier.de

Inzwischen sprechen Menschenrechtsorganisationen auch von ?Bluthandys? oder ?schmutzigen Handys?. Denn die Mobiltelefone enthalten viele Edelmetalle. Und die kommen auch aus Afrika, vor allem aus dem Kongo, von wo immer wieder blutige Massaker gemeldet ...

http://www.suedkurier.de/news/panorama/leben-und-wissen/Goldader-hinterm-Klingelton-Edelmetalle-im-Handy;art761224,4728580

--------

28. November: Film zu 'Blut am Handy'

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/67ee259262386303



Montag 6. Februar, Dokumentarfilm ''Blut im Handy''

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/733c80104c1619f6



Mehr zum Thema:

http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Kongo
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Kongo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kongo
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Congo
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Congo
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Coltan
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Coltan
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Coltan
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Nokia
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Nokia
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Nokia

AOK-Handy-Werbung: Antworten

--------

Grund zur Kritik: Handy-Werbung im AOK-Gesundheitsmagazin

http://www.gegenwelle.de/mobilfunk-und-wirtschaft/grund-zur-kritik-handy-werbung-im-aok-gesundheitsmagazin.html

--------

Handy-Werbung im "Gesundheitsmagazin"
http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=15326



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=elektromagnetisch+Feld
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=elektromagnetisch+Feld
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=athermisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=athermisch
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Handynutzung
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Handynutzung
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Grenzwert
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Grenzwert
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=genotoxisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=genotoxisch
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Melatonin
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Melatonin
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Elektrosensib
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Elektrosensib
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Sperm
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sperm
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Mobilfunklobby
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mobilfunklobby
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Bundesamt+für+Strahlenschutz
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Bundesamt+für+Strahlenschutz
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Lerchl
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Lerchl
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Adlkofer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Adlkofer
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Joachim+Mutter
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Joachim+Mutter
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Hardell
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Cindy+Sage
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage

HLV Info 067

29.09.2010

IZMF-Fortbildungsveranstaltungen für Ärzte 2010

Auszüge: http://forum.gigaherz.ch/viewtopic.php?t=29102

Gast t.B.

22.09.2010

Guten Tag, ich habe in der Praxis meines Hausarztes folgenden Flyer gefunden.

"Mobilfunk in Forschung und medizinischer Praxis: Elektromagnetische Felder des Mobilfunks und ihre Bedeutung für die Gesundheit."

Dabei handelt es sich um eine Fortbildungsveranstaltung des Informationszentrums Mobilfunk die speziell an Ärzte ausgerichtet ist. Anmelden kann man sich nur als Mediziner, Gäste sind nicht zugelassen.

Ich komme aus Kassel und dort findet diese Veranstaltung am 06. Oktober 2010 statt. Auf der Homepage des IZMF sind diese Infos und weitere Termine zu finden:

IZMF-Fortbildungsveranstaltungen für Ärzte 2010

Die Fortbildungsveranstaltungen richten sich an Mediziner, Psychologen, medizinnahe Berufsgruppen sowie Mitarbeiter des öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes. Sie informieren über das Thema gesundheitliche Auswirkungen von elektromagnetischen Feldern beim Mobilfunk. Neben sachlich und wissenschaftlich fundiertem Basiswissen werden auch Ergebnisse und Zwischenberichte aktueller und laufender Forschungsprojekte vorgestellt. Die inhaltliche Verantwortung liegt bei der Kinderumwelt gGmbH und dem umweltmedizinischen Bereich der Universität Gießen.

Folgende Veranstaltungstermine sind geplant:
21.04.2010 in Düsseldorf
06.10.2010 in Kassel
27.10.2010 in Kiel
10.11.2010 in Ludwigshafen"

Vortragende sind Alexander Lerchl, Georg Praml und Caroline Herr!

Ich werde versuchen am 06.Oktober in Kassel vor Ort zu sein! Ich finde es skandalös, wie die Ärzte, die meist der erste Ansprechpartner für Betroffene sind, durch diese Industriepropaganda dazu geschult werden sollen, Patienten zu psychatrisieren. Mein Hausarzt war völlig verblüfft, als ich ihm erläuterte, wer hinter diesem Informationszentrum Mobilfunk steckt. Er hatte vor, die Veranstaltung zu besuchen, um sich endlich objektiv informieren zu können. Ihm war nicht klar, dass dieser Verein von den großen Mobilfunkkonzernen getragen wird.

WOHNT JEMAND IN DER NÄHE EINER DER GENANNTEN STÄDTE? GEHT DORT HIN UND VERSUCHT DORT ZU PROTESTIEREN!


E.W.

22.09.2010

Prof. Alexander Lerchl, Leiter der Strahlenschutzkommission NIS, erarbeitet nach eigener Angabe in Workshops zusammen mit dem IZMF (gemeinütziges Info-Zentrum der Mobilfunkbetreiber) die Fortbildung der niedergelassenen Ärzte. Beteiligt ist die Universität Gießen sowie "Kinder-Umwelt". http://www.izgmf.de/scripts/forum/index.php?id=38328 und http://www.izgmf.de/scripts/forum/index.php?id=39908

Am 7.12.2006 verkündete Prof. Eikmann, Umweltmediziner der Uni Gießen, im Bayer. Landtag in etwa: "Wenn Patienten zu uns kommen und ihre Beschwerden auf elektromagnetische Felder zurückführen, so teilen wir ihnen mit, dass wir als behandelnde Ärzte die Ansicht haben, dass es das eigentlich nicht gibt." Frau Prof. Herr wurde bei dieser Gelegenheit gleich vorgestellt, sie übernimmt ja auch mit die Fortbildung der niedergelassenen Ärzte.

Fact Sheet 296 WHO wird in jedem Falle Genüge getan! Anweisung an Ärzte in etwa: "... Symptome behandeln, nicht die Strahlung verringern, wie dies der Patient für nötig erachtet, weder am Arbeitsplatz noch im persönlichen Umfeld."

Übrigens ein Sprecher des mich betreffenden Mobilfunkbetreibers: "Gehen Sie doch zu Prof. Eikmann, der wartet auf Leute wie Sie!"

Auffallend, dass Schlafstörungen, Kopfschmerz, etc. und höherer Arzeneimittelverbrauch mit zunehmender Aufrüstung von Mobilfunk einhergehen.


HLV Kommentar:

Die lobbyistische Interessenwahrnehmung der Professoren Alexander Lerchl, Thomas Eikmann sowie Frau Caroline Herr ist bekannt und wurde in der Vergangenheit vom HLV und diversen BI?s beklagt und öffentlich thematisiert. Obwohl die zuständigen Landesärztekammern über die Verflechtungen der industriegefälligen Tätigkeiten der genannten Lobbyisten Kenntnis haben, werden nach wie vor Zertifizierungspunkte an die unwissende Ärzteschaft vergeben, die instrumentalisierte Informationen erhalten. Dies ist schlichtweg ein Skandal!

Die tendenziösen einseitigen Informationen können nicht oft genug kritisiert werden. Auffallend wurde bei vergangenen Veranstaltungen auch festgestellt, dass die Beiträge der Referenten, die diese für gute Honorierung abhalten, von Diffamierungen gegenüber Betroffenen und warnenden internationalen Gutachten nur so strotzten.

In diesem Zusammenhang erinnern wir auch an die u.a. im vergangenen Jahr stattgefundene IZMF Ärztefortbildungsveranstaltung in Stuttgart, bei der 15 Teilnehmer aus Protest und mit Beifall begleitet den Saal verließen. Die dortigen Referenten waren ebenfalls Lerchl und Caroline Herr, ein eingeschworenes Tandem welches sich die Auftritte gut bezahlen läßt.



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=elektromagnetisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=elektromagnetisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mobilfunkkonzern
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Mobilfunkbetreiber
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Lobby
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Strahlenschutzkommission
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Strahlenschutzkommission
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=IZMF
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=IZMF
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Lerchl
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Lerchl
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Caroline+Herr
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Eikmann

HLV Info 060

Lobbyismus für den Bundesverband Interaktive Unterhaltungssoftware (BIU)?


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

seit gestern finden Sie in den Tageszeitungen nachfolgende dpa-Presseinformation.

Statt Computerspiele mit irritierenden und schädlichen Inhalten einzudämmen wird scheinbar eine industriegefällige Verkaufs- und Anwendungsförderung initiiert.

Ein unglaublicher Vorgang, dem Einhalt geboten werden sollte!

Wenn Sie ebenfalls dieser Meinung sein sollten, empfehlen wir eine Protestnote Ihrerseits an die politischen Verantwortlichen in Berlin zu richten.


Alfred Tittmann
c/o HESSSICHER LANDESVERBAND MOBILFUNKSENDERFREIE WOHNGEBIETE e.V.


Frankfurter Rundschau

23.08.2010

Abgeordnete bereiten LAN-Party im Bundestag vor

http://www.fr-online.de/digital/abgeordnete-bereiten-lan-party-im-bundestag-vor/-/1472406/4583584/-/index.html



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=WLAN
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=WLAN

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/146a501d5f1b63a



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=elektromagnetisch+Feld
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=elektromagnetisch+Feld
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Sendemast
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sendemast
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Mobilfunkstrahlung
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Mobilfunkstrahlung
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Handystrahlung
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Handystrahlung
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Elektrosmog
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Elektrosmog
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=genotoxisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=genotoxisch
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Erbgut
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Melatonin
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Melatonin
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Gesundheitsgefährdung
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Gesundheitsgefährdung
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Kopfschmerz
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Kopfschmerz
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Strahlenschutzkommission
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Strahlenschutzkommission
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Bundesamt+für+Strahlenschutz
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Bundesamt+für+Strahlenschutz
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Kompetenzinitiative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Kompetenzinitiative
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Adlkofer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Adlkofer

Please see the attached document.

Is this a despicable attempt to stop the truth about the dangers of electro magnetic radiation?


By John Weigel

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/karolinska-nobel-prize-institute-threatens-work-of-noted-wireless-safety-researcher/


Wireless Internet in SD 20: good for learning, bad for kids?
http://rosslandtelegraph.com/node/6362


Informant: Martin Weatherall


Support Prof. Olle Johansson
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Support-Prof-Olle-Johansson/137594306315704

---------

Important information regarding Olle Johansson:

Please find below the answer from Professor Staffan Cullheim, head of the department where Olle Johansson is employed at the Karolinska Instititute. The rumours that Olle Johansson is fired or loosing his working space is not correct. There are negociations at the department of reducing the space, 120 m2, that Johansson occupies since the year 2000, which is substantially more than anybody else at the department has. Normally 7-8 persons share 120 m2. Olle Johansson is therefore offered other space at other locations within the institute. All other researchers, including Professor Cullheim, has already moved within the insitutuion, with the exception of Olle Johansson.

Kind regards

Solveig Silverin


From: Staffan.Cullheim@ki.se
To: solveigsilverin@hotmail.com
CC: registrator@ki.se; rektorssekreterare@ki.se; Eva.Tegelberg@ki.se; O.Kiehn@ki.se
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:09:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Pressmedelande gällande docent Olle Johansson KI

Hej!

Pressmeddelandet ger inte korrekt information. Olle Johansson kommer att erbjudas andra lokaler än de han nu förfogar över. Inom alla företag och organisationer sker omflyttningar av verksamhet för att helheten skall fungera så bra som möjligt. I det aktuella fallet behövs de lokaler Olle Johansson nu befinner sig i för ett av Karolinska Institutet särskilt prioriterat centrum för mikroskopisk avbildning. Han kommer att erbjudas alternativa lokaler av samma standard som de nuvarande. En viss neddragning av ytan är dock nödvändig mot bakgrund av han som ensam anställd vid Institutionen för neurovetenskap nu förfogar över en lokalyta på c:a 120 kvm, vilket är fullständigt unikt för institutionen och Karolinska Institutet. Det normala antalet arbetande inom en så stor yta är 7-8 personer. Lokalkostnaden för Olle Johanssons ytor är c:a 550 000 kr/år, varav han själv står för 2/3 med egna forskningsmedel medan institutionen betalar resterande 1/3. Institutionen ser det som orimli gt att så stora lokalkostnader skall läggas på en enskild individ. Institutionens övriga forskare har också börjat ifrågasätta institutionsledningens positiva särbehandling av Olle Johansson i detta avseende.

Vår avsikt är alltså att erbjuda Olle Johansson lokaler av samma standard som hans nuvarande, men på annan plats inom den byggnad Institutionen för neurovetenskap befinner sig. Lokalerna kommer också att storleksanpassas för att någorlunda harmoniera med institutionens övriga forskargruppers lokalanvändning.

Detta är första gången Olle Johansson behöver flytta sedan institutionen samlades i den s k Retziusbyggnaden år 2000. Praktiskt taget samtliga andra forskare, inklusive jag själv, har redan flyttat inom byggnaden minst en gång under denna tid. Självfallet skall vi i samband med Olle Johanssons flytt se till att minimera eventuella olägenheter som kan uppstå.

Med vänlig hälsning,

Staffan Cullheim
Professor, prefekt
Institutionen för neurovetenskap
Karolinska Institutet


----- Original Message -----
From: Solveig Silverin <solveigsilverin@hotmail.com>
Date: Friday, July 9, 2010 2:50 pm
Subject: Pressmedelande gällande docent Olle Johansson KI
To: Staffan Cullheim KI <Staffan.Cullheim@ki.se>

Hej!

Enligt ett pressmeddelande är det beslutat att docent Olle Johansson KI inte får ha kvar sina lokaler, se pressmeddelandet och man hänvisar till dig. Vi undrar om detta stämmer och vad är bakgrunden till detta?

Med vänlig hälsning

Solveig Silverin

--------

RE: Prof. Olle Johansson
Von: Sibylle Gabriel
Datum: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:58:39 +0200

Read this message from Olle. We are living in a very very wicked world.

Sibylle


-------- Original-Nachricht --------

Datum: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:51:34 -0700
Von: Olle Johansson
An: Sibylle Gabriel
Betreff: Re: Fwd: RE: Prof. Olle Johansson

Dear Sibylle and Mimsy,

This is not true. It is just smoke and spin. See my own reply to Staffan Cullheim, to which he has not responded yet*; the original in Swedish and my translation of it into English. (*His only response so far came today, August 3, in which he asks me: "If you could arrest the intense e-mail activity from people out in the world that I (my comment: Staffan Cullheim) now have to deal with together with the President (my comment: Harriet Wallberg-Henriksson) it would be easier for me and the President to concentrate on solving our common problem!")

In summary, as you will see, he is blaming a whole variety of different persons who has "demanded this action against me". I am now myself demanding Staffan Cullheim to send me all these persons' names. In addition, I challenge all of his arguments, which I find to be just empty balloons.

Any further assistance, support, suggestions, ideas, from you will all be very helpful - I am afraid that people in general will rest their cases, not realizing that they will have to send reminders, send reminders, send reminders, and then send reminders again.

I wish you a very good evening!

Olle Johansson, assoc. prof.
The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm Sweden

&

Professor The Royal Institute of Technology
100 44 Stockholm Sweden


----- Original Message -----

From: Sibylle Gabriel
Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 12:48 pm
Subject: Fwd: RE: Prof. Olle Johansson
To: Olle.Johansson@ki.se

Hi Olle,

it seems that the situation is changing now for you. I am very happy that you will be able to continue your precious work.

Here the mail that Mimsy got just now from Staffan Cullheim.


From: Staffan.Cullheim@ki.se
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:09:12 +0200
Subject: Re: Prof. Olle Johansson

Thank you for your letter expressing concerns about Dr Olle Johansson's research activities at the Karolinska Institutet.

The basic facts regarding his situation seems to have been misunderstood, however. From your letter and others, the impression is that we have decided to acutely withdraw Dr Johansson's premises or at least change them in a way that brings large obstacles to his work. In reality, there is a plan to move his laboratory within our department, and he will be offered premises and conditions that will suit his activities well.

In all companies and organisations it is accepted that the location of various activities may change with time in order to optimize the effectivity of the organisation. The rooms that Olle Johansson uses at the moment are planned for an extension of a special facility for microscopic imaging. But, as already stated, he will be offered alternative premises.

Thus, our aim is to offer Olle Johansson premises of the same standard as those he is currently using, but at another location in the building where our department is located. The size of the premises will be adjusted somewhat to harmonize with the use of space of the other 35 research groups at the department. The costs for premises are shared between the research groups and the department.

This is the first time Olle Johansson needs to move since the department assembled in the Retzius building in 2000. Almost all other researchers, including myself, have already moved within the house at least once during this time. We will of course see to that we minimize the troubles linked with the moving process so that Olle Johansson's work can be continued in an efficient way. I will discuss with him in August a plan that will give the least inconvenience for him.


Sincerely yours,

Staffan Cullheim
Professor, chair
Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet


Olle has given me permission to send this out to all of us who have written in protest as Steffan Culheim is trying to pour oil on troubled waters, trouble is he's lying through his teeth.

So anyone who has received a similar email please write back and protest shaming him into elling the truth and acting with some integrity.


Steve


Informant: CGamba

--------

Mobbing of Prof. Olle Johansson
http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/c6c96c95f0c2904f



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=wireless+internet
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=children
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=children
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Johansson
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Johansson
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Magda+Havas
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Magda+Havas
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=John+Weigel