[Dr. Martha R. Herbert of the Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital has written a powerful letter with a clear message to a US school division considering installing wiifi in schools. Every parent, grandparent, teacher, school administrator, school board trustee and others working in the school system needs to read this letter.
Please make a copy and give it to any and all medical practitioners. This is too important for our children s well being to ignore. Please distribute the attached letter widely.
Marg Friesen
PS The scientific peer-reviewed papers Dr. Herbert refers to can be found in the BioInitative 2012 report which has information covering other aspects of non-ionizing radiation and human health.
BioInitiative 2012 Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF
Right Side News
Human beings are bioelectrical systems. Our hearts and brains are regulated by internal bioelectrical signals. Environmental exposures to artificial EMFs...
New Zealand Smart Meter radiation has 35 kilometer range
Power firms tell their customers that smart meters only have a short range for transmitting wireless signals.
However, I contacted my power company in New Zealand, Contact Energy, and had it confirmed that smart meters have a transmission range of up to 21 miles.
I was dismayed to read your article, even more so when I saw the video footage of a mother being arrested for defending her basic human rights in an apparently free and democratic nation. Given situations like this are typically arrived at via a clear and traceable decision making processes, I wanted to pass on some learnings from our experience here in the UK which may help you gain clarity for where events may lead going forward if the current course of action is maintained.
In circumstances similar to those being created by the City of Naperville, individual representatives of companies or city authorities can be held responsible for their actions, whether they are backed by legislative process or not. If an individual (or group of individuals) knowingly deploys and forces others to have a device which has been identified as a threat to people s health, security and safety, and those threats materialise, then those individuals can be pursued under a Private Criminal Prosecution, individually, for ''Vicarious Liability'', as an ''Accomplice'', in Law, for ''Assault'', ''Actual Bodily Harm'' and/or ''Grievous Bodily Harm''. This would be on the grounds that it is individuals, or groups of individuals, that take decisions, and are therefore liable for those decisions. If anyone is harmed or suffers loss as a result of a Smart Meters, for example, then they will be within their rights to pursue Prosecution against the individuals who forced those meters upon them, individually.
Under these circumstances, ''I was just following orders/protocol/doing my job'' would not provide any individuals facing one or more Private Criminal Prosecutions with a line of defence. The Nuremberg Trials showed us this. Utility firms and City ''decision makers'' have the responsibility to provide utility services safely without causing harm. They cannot be given a lawful mandate by ANY authority to install harmful spyware into people?s homes, if they decide to do so and believe they have protection through legislation, they can very much be held accountable, personally, for those actions should that legislation turn into a public health disaster (e.g. tobacco).
In the UK, if someone successfully pursues a Private Criminal Prosecution against another individual for Assault, Actual Bodily Harm and/or Grievous Bodily Harm, the penalties can be severe, including imprisonment, if found guilty. Second offences for Grievous Bodily Harm or similar carry mandatory life sentences here.
Quite presciently, the national Government here has taken the decision to not force people to have Smart Meters. This may be, in part, as a result of the EU reflecting on the findings of the Bioinitiative Reports which you refer to below. Despite this, the UK s official threshold for Non-Ionising Electromagnetic Radiation is still amongst the highest in the world (they were, in fact, voted ''obsolete'' and ''out of date'' by the EU in 2008). But as you know, however, the thresholds in the United States are even worse, much worse. It goes without saying that those chickens will surely come home to roost one day, and when they do, there s a good chance they will be infertile (sadly, one of the many observable bioeffects caused by sustained exposure to electromagnetic radiation is sperm having 3x less motility and vitality and dying 3x more quickly than unexposed sperm).
In respect of other observable biological effects and impacts from devices such as Smart Meters, it is also worth mentioning that electomagnetic radiation provokes major effects in the brain. The most important of these is the opening of the blood-brain barrier, this allows mercury, organochlorines and other pollutants to enter in the brain, where they can cause various neurodegenerative diseases. We know this because there are now techniques which have been developed which show the causal link between electromagnetic radiation exposure and biological and neurological effects.
Why is this important? Because it not only allows people who are suffering from any number of these bioeffects to identify the cause of what is ailing them, but also the source, i.e. the individual decision makers who may have had a hand in forcing them to have, for example, a Smart Meter.
In the words of Calvin Coolidge; ''There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, any time.''
Doctors claim increasing numbers of men are asking for testosterone replacement therapy, claiming to be suffering from lethargy and loss of libido
Dr Malcolm Curruthers runs a private practice specialising in TRT that has had 20,000 enquiries in the past year. He says: ?The average age of my patients used to be about 50. Now it?s closer to 40 and my youngest patients are in their 20s.?
Naperville smart meter foes criticize arrest of protesters
''Anyone in the audience or anyone watching this at home should be very concerned when the city government starts enforcing city municipal code with police force,'' she said.
See the devastating effect of cell phone radiation on your sperm. After watching this video, you won t carry your phone in your pants pocket again!
Today, C4ST is launching a Valentine s Day campaign entitled ''Don t Kill the Love'' that highlights the damage done to sperm mobility when keeping cell phones in pants pocket. As part of this campaign we are running a contest that encourages participants to tell us a story when a cell phone ''Killed the Moment''. We hope you will watch and share this video with your friends and families, and encourage them to sign up as a Citizen of Safe Technology. Please enter our contest!
On YouTube (http://youtu.be/bHP2IJC2_ko) and the website athttp://www.c4st.org/dontkillthelove
Steuert China auf eine "Unfruchtbarkeitskatastrophe" zu?
Die anhaltende Umwelt- und vor allem Luftverschmutzung in den Megacities gilt als einer der Hauptgründe für die wachsende Unfruchtbarkeit und die sinkende Qualität der Spermien...
... and adverse health effects from electromagnetic fields such as power lines, ... ELF (extremely low frequency) and a set specific to electro-sensitivity...
The update contains new chapters and strong new scientific evidence about the dangers of electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure. If you read the information that has been provided in the BioInitiative Report by 19 scientists and 10 medical doctors, who...
The World Health Organization International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC) designated ELF-EMF as a Group 2B (Possible) Carcinogen in 2001. This is the kind of exposure from power lines, battery switching in cell phone devices, laptop computers and appliances. The World Health Organization specifically reaffirmed it s finding that EMF is classifiable as a Group 2B Possible Human Carcinogen in 2006 in their Health Criteria Monograph #238.
World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Cancer Classifications:
Group 1 Known Human Carcinogen
Group 2A Probable Human Carcinogen
Group 2B Possible Human Carcinogen
Group 3 Insufficient Evidence
Group 4 Not A Carcinogen
In 2012, IARC determined that scientific evidence is sufficient now to classify radiofrequency radiation (non-ionizing) as a Group 2B Possible Human Carcinogen. This is the kind of exposure from cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, electronic baby monitors and wireless ?smart? utility meters.
So, what does this mean? According to the classification categories, it is again clear IARC did NOT find so little clear and consistent evidence to support a finding of ''Not A Carcinogen''. That would be the valid test that RFR is safe, as best public health experts can judge the evidence. Nor did IARC find that the evidence we have is just not sufficient yet to decide the question (to make a judgment). Rather, IARC found the evidence supports classification as a Possible (not Probable or Known Carcinogen) cancer-causing agent.
That is not a weak or reckless judgment made with few facts. It should be a strong warning to governments to reconsider their safety standards, particularly in light of the billions of people at potential health risk from new wireless technologies. That studies of cell and cordless phones and of wireless whole-body RFR exposures already make health impacts ?epidemiologically visible? (Sections 11 and 21).
Peter Schlegel, Dipl. Ing. ETH/SIA
Güeterstalstrasse 19
CH-8133 Esslingen
Tel. und Fax ++41 +44 9840039
info(at)buergerwelle-schweiz.org http://www.buergerwelle-schweiz.org
--------
Einladung zum 9. Nationalen Elektrosmog-Kongress, Samstag, 20. April 2013, 09.00-17.30 Uhr, Hotel Bern, Bern
Am 20. April 2013 findet in Bern der 9. Nationale Elektrosmog-Kongress statt. In der Beilage erhalten Sie den Flyer und die Zusammenfassungen der Referate. Ein Schwerpunktthema des diesjährigen Kongresses ist ''Zellveränderungen im Zusammenhang mit nichtionisierender Strahlung''. Ausgewiesene Experten aus Forschung und Praxis berichten über ihre aktuellen Arbeiten. 2011 stufte die WHO Mobilfunkstrahlung als ''möglicherweise krebserregend für den Menschen'' ein. Diese Entscheidung stützte sich hauptsächlich auf die Studien der Hardell-Gruppe. Professor Hardell wird am Kongress die Resultate seiner neuesten Studie präsentieren.
Am vergangenen Samstag fand in Bern der 9. Nationale Elektrosmog-Kongress statt.
170 Gäste aus der ganzen Schweiz, Deutschland, Österreich, Italien, Frankreich, Belgien und den Niederlanden konnten sich über die neuesten Erkenntnisse unabhängiger Wissenschaftler/Innen aus Brasilien, Schweden, Italien und der Schweiz informieren. Alles Weitere finden Sie auf http://www.gigaherz.ch/1895
Hans-U. Jakob
Fachstelle Nichtionisierende Strahlung von Gigaherz.ch
Flüehli 17
3150 Schwarzenburg
Cell Phone Use and Salivary...
https://noy.soundestlink.com/ce/v/6386724829e2d8001d105f53/6705774b06284babfed18ff5?signature=645f52a7600b24ac293a86261849ffd138e9059967daa9c98c8fb933f8724afe
More...
