Following Cell Tower Controversy Christ Church Focuses on Community
Attinson said he did not expect the negative reaction from the community as the plans became public but at the time they had already signed a lease with T-Mobile. ''One of the things that is very important to us is to serve the community,'' he said. ''It s why we are here. When I saw the response I felt terrible.''
I was dismayed to read your article, even more so when I saw the video footage of a mother being arrested for defending her basic human rights in an apparently free and democratic nation. Given situations like this are typically arrived at via a clear and traceable decision making processes, I wanted to pass on some learnings from our experience here in the UK which may help you gain clarity for where events may lead going forward if the current course of action is maintained.
In circumstances similar to those being created by the City of Naperville, individual representatives of companies or city authorities can be held responsible for their actions, whether they are backed by legislative process or not. If an individual (or group of individuals) knowingly deploys and forces others to have a device which has been identified as a threat to people s health, security and safety, and those threats materialise, then those individuals can be pursued under a Private Criminal Prosecution, individually, for ''Vicarious Liability'', as an ''Accomplice'', in Law, for ''Assault'', ''Actual Bodily Harm'' and/or ''Grievous Bodily Harm''. This would be on the grounds that it is individuals, or groups of individuals, that take decisions, and are therefore liable for those decisions. If anyone is harmed or suffers loss as a result of a Smart Meters, for example, then they will be within their rights to pursue Prosecution against the individuals who forced those meters upon them, individually.
Under these circumstances, ''I was just following orders/protocol/doing my job'' would not provide any individuals facing one or more Private Criminal Prosecutions with a line of defence. The Nuremberg Trials showed us this. Utility firms and City ''decision makers'' have the responsibility to provide utility services safely without causing harm. They cannot be given a lawful mandate by ANY authority to install harmful spyware into people?s homes, if they decide to do so and believe they have protection through legislation, they can very much be held accountable, personally, for those actions should that legislation turn into a public health disaster (e.g. tobacco).
In the UK, if someone successfully pursues a Private Criminal Prosecution against another individual for Assault, Actual Bodily Harm and/or Grievous Bodily Harm, the penalties can be severe, including imprisonment, if found guilty. Second offences for Grievous Bodily Harm or similar carry mandatory life sentences here.
Quite presciently, the national Government here has taken the decision to not force people to have Smart Meters. This may be, in part, as a result of the EU reflecting on the findings of the Bioinitiative Reports which you refer to below. Despite this, the UK s official threshold for Non-Ionising Electromagnetic Radiation is still amongst the highest in the world (they were, in fact, voted ''obsolete'' and ''out of date'' by the EU in 2008). But as you know, however, the thresholds in the United States are even worse, much worse. It goes without saying that those chickens will surely come home to roost one day, and when they do, there s a good chance they will be infertile (sadly, one of the many observable bioeffects caused by sustained exposure to electromagnetic radiation is sperm having 3x less motility and vitality and dying 3x more quickly than unexposed sperm).
In respect of other observable biological effects and impacts from devices such as Smart Meters, it is also worth mentioning that electomagnetic radiation provokes major effects in the brain. The most important of these is the opening of the blood-brain barrier, this allows mercury, organochlorines and other pollutants to enter in the brain, where they can cause various neurodegenerative diseases. We know this because there are now techniques which have been developed which show the causal link between electromagnetic radiation exposure and biological and neurological effects.
Why is this important? Because it not only allows people who are suffering from any number of these bioeffects to identify the cause of what is ailing them, but also the source, i.e. the individual decision makers who may have had a hand in forcing them to have, for example, a Smart Meter.
In the words of Calvin Coolidge; ''There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, any time.''
Doctors claim increasing numbers of men are asking for testosterone replacement therapy, claiming to be suffering from lethargy and loss of libido
Dr Malcolm Curruthers runs a private practice specialising in TRT that has had 20,000 enquiries in the past year. He says: ?The average age of my patients used to be about 50. Now it?s closer to 40 and my youngest patients are in their 20s.?
See the devastating effect of cell phone radiation on your sperm. After watching this video, you won t carry your phone in your pants pocket again!
Today, C4ST is launching a Valentine s Day campaign entitled ''Don t Kill the Love'' that highlights the damage done to sperm mobility when keeping cell phones in pants pocket. As part of this campaign we are running a contest that encourages participants to tell us a story when a cell phone ''Killed the Moment''. We hope you will watch and share this video with your friends and families, and encourage them to sign up as a Citizen of Safe Technology. Please enter our contest!
On YouTube (http://youtu.be/bHP2IJC2_ko) and the website athttp://www.c4st.org/dontkillthelove