Mobiltelefone sind aus unserem Alltag nicht mehr wegzudenken. Allerdings ist immer wieder die Rede von unerwarteten Langzeitfolgen der damit verbundenen Mikrowellen. In Schweden wurde nun ein Protein gefunden, welches eventuell einen Schaden nachweisen könnte.
Eine Studie aus Örebro in Schweden belegte jetzt, dass Mobiltelefone und andere schnurlose Telefone Auswirkungen auf das Gehirn haben.
Scandinavians don't get cancer from cell phones, but do you?
Bright Side of News
... Science, Spin and the Truth Behind Interphone," was released in August 2009, by a collaborative of international EMF [electromagnetic field] activists. ...
Cell Phones and Brain Cancer: The jury is still out
In fact, in Sweden, Norway and Finland, about half of all persons had cell phones in 2000. It would be unreasonable to expect to see any general population effect from such phone use in such a short period of time. Scientists know that brain cancer can take a decade or longer to develop in adults. In the case of the Hiroshima bombing that ended World War Two, brain cancers associated with that one time massive exposure to radiation did not become evident until forty years later.
The authors of this work published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute actually are much more balanced than the headline writers. We all recognize the tremendous positive role that phones are playing around the world today. But, their safety, and their impact on the developing brain, remains a matter of grave concern that merits serious research and will not be resolved by spinning limited studies such as this one.
The authors of this analysis of brain cancer in adults in Northern Europe note that their findings could simply mean that their study did not follow people for long enough period of time and that their study did not determine or focus on those individuals who had used cell phones the most for the longest, especially young adults. Instead, their analysis solely reported on the trend in this one site of cancer.
A number of researchers who have looked at more detailed studies on brain cancer and cell phone use have reached far different conclusions. Only after 10 or more years of very heavy mobile phone use does a risk of brain cancer become evident. Prof. Lennart Hardell of Sweden has found that those who begin using cell phones heavily as teenagers have 4 to 5 times more brain cancer as young adults. In this recent study of the entire population, very few persons are likely to have been heavy users of cell phones for more than a decade and even fewer will have done so since adolescence.
Given the limited networks available at the time that this Scandinavian study began, and the high cost of earlier phones, proportionally few people have been heavy users for a long period of time. To conclude that the absence of a clear trend of increased brain tumors in Scandinavia means that there will be no such trend in the future is wishful thinking that endangers all of us.
Recent studies by scientists in many different nations have found that radiofrequency signals can directly damage DNA without producing any noticeable change in temperature, and can produce cancer-inducing free radicals, proteins known to be tied with mutation, and memory loss in both animals and humans. (see http://www.environmentalhealthtrust.org for more details) Given the dramatic increase in mobile phone use in the past few years, it is foolish to assume that their safety has been established. The technologies are changing rapidly. We need a major international research program to evaluate their impact on health, especially how they affect the brain of the young.
Israel, France, China, Russia, Finland, Scotland, the U.K., and the European Commission have all issued various warnings to limit the use of cell phones by children. The brain of a child doubles in the first two years of life and is not fully mature and protected until the early twenties.
Four billion people today are using cell phones and many of them are under the age of twenty. In truth the jury is out on the long term impacts of cell phones on our health. There is no scientific basis to conclude otherwise.
Study Reports No Link Between Cancer and Cell Phone Use, Yet Doesn?t Dismiss the Risk
Ergoweb
The underlying question is whether the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the devices damages the brain, causing cancers or benign tumors like acoustic ...
... based on your distance to a cell phone base station (cell phone tower). ... Essentially, the FCC is a mortgage holder for the mobile phone industry! ...
Dear Victims of Michael Repacholi (and associates):
The finding made by Dr. Lai at the University of Washington concerning the capacity of cell phone telephony to damage the human genome is an outstanding rediscovery of the medical marvels of US and Socialist Medicine during the XXth century. The presence of micronuclei in vegetable species was a harbinger of the health scandal that was forming inside EMF Project of the World Health Oranization. More Tobacco Science and millions of dead.
The need to study day and night the history and dialectical evolution of the biological effects of microwaves, goes without saying.
Micronuclei, which are a pathological evidence of genetic damage, can be easily evidenced with the common light microscope. The technique developed to recognize the presence of this genetic damage is technically called Alkaline Single Cell Gel Microelectrophoresis Assay or in simple terms, the comet assay.
I would like to refer you all to a paragraph in the classic of the field entitled: "Biological Effects of Microwaves" written by S. Baranski and P. Czerski. On page 132 they write:
"Chromosomal Effects, Possible Genetic Effects, and Influence of Microwave Radiation on Mitosis. Cellular Effects
Chromosomal aberrations and mitotic abnormalities may be induced, at least under certain conditions and in certain cell types, by exposure to microwave or radiofrequency fields. This is a well-established fact, as several reports from at least five independent laboratories exist. A series of investigations was carried out by Heller his coworkers at the New England Institute for Medical Research, Ridgefield, Connecticut. These authors were the first to observe such effects in 1958, and have continued their research till now. Chromosomal and mitotic aberrations could be induced in garlic root tips exposed to 5-40 MHz PW at various pulse duration 15 to 30 ms, repetition rates 500 to 1000 Hz and intensities varying between 250 to 6000 V/cm. Bridging, fragmentation,micronuclei, and chromosomal lagging were observed."
Yes. Absolutely. As long as they are turned off. Of course, that still leaves the transmissions towers that radiate pulsed microwaves in all directions, 24/7.
"In terms of diagnosis, the EMF intolerance syndrome can be recognised on the basis of several criteria: the absence of any other recognised pathology which could explain the symptoms; an abnormal pulsed echodoppler examination of the brain showing a clear decrease in the pulsatility of several areas of the brain; an increase in the blood of stress proteins and other biomarkers reflecting cerebral suffering. In addition, about 50% of patients have shown a decrease in the levels of urinary melatonin (a sleep hormone), which could be a cause or a consequence of their insomnia."
S100 proteins have been implicated in a variety of intracellular and extracellular functions. S100 proteins are involved in regulation of protein phosphorylation, transcription factors, Ca++ homeostasis, the dynamics of cytoskeleton constituents, enzyme activities, cell growth and differentiation, and the inflammatory response.
An other mechanism to say EMF are guilty with a lot of side effects?
Karin Kdoshim from Givat Shmuel was an excellent student in school. In May 2000 when she was 17 years old, she was hospitalizaled and diagnosed with leukemia. In 2002 she died. Now 7 years later, her family is filing a lawsuit against the power company. The radiation was 10 times more than the standard of which there's a cancer risk, accroding to IARC. Karin lived there since 1998, and the power company acted only in 2003 to reduce the level. Dr. Sigal Sadezki is the expert that helps the family, she wrote that "In a comprehensive check there was found no risk factor that can be related to the disease apart from her exposure to magnetic field. I think that it is certainly possible that her disease and death were caused by the radiation levels she was exposed to".
Cell Phone Use and Salivary...
https://noy.soundestlink.com/ce/v/6386724829e2d8001d105f53/6705774b06284babfed18ff5?signature=645f52a7600b24ac293a86261849ffd138e9059967daa9c98c8fb933f8724afe
More...
