14
Mrz
2010

Schützen die gesetzlichen Grenzwerte ausreichend unsere Gesundheit?

http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/t/b72533d1f51d5504



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Grenzwert
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Grenzwert

What you should know about cellphone and brain tumors

The article "What you should know about cellphone and brain tumors" by Christiane Tourtet B.A. has been published in the American Chronicle and its 21 affiliates magazines.

Everyone using a cell phone should read it and take the necessary precautions, especially if they are children in the household.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/145890

It is better to be safe than sorry!

--------

EMR radiation from Blackberry smart phone when receiving an Email

New clip on our YouTube channel:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVtwSsZAtnY

Many people use a smart phone as a working tool, they carry it with them all day long and use it to send and receive lots of emails and SMS.

When you carry your smart phone and you use it to receive and send emails you are exposed to a lot of electromagnetic radiation during the day.

This video will show you the levels or radiation emitted from the smart phone when a single email is received.

Thanks for watching.

Please rate, comment and share with others.


No Rad


----- Original Message -----

Blackberries are the worst. When the email sync function (push) is on the device sync the mailbox every 1 minute for 12 seconds. This means that if you hold/carry/ware the blackberry for 6 hours a day you are exposed to 1 hour of EMR without even talking on it. In addition the levels of EMR blackberries emit is relativly high (~1.4 SAR). No Rad


I bought the Blackberry Torch yesterday which comes with a small safety and product information guide. The font is actually larger than the iphone guide. Also, on page 4 when it gives the spiel about when wearing the device close to your body keep a distance of at least .98 in. or it may cause your device to exceed rf exposure standards, it also states: THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF EXCEEDING RF EXPOSURE STANDARDS MIGHT PRESENT A RISK OF SERIOUS HARM.

Page 23: Use in areas when there is a strong signal....... A reduced signal might indicate increased power output. ...Use hands- free if available and keep the Blackberry at least .98 in. from your body IINCLUDING THE ABDOMEN OF PREGNANT WOMEN AND THE LOWER ABDOMEN OF TEENAGERS!!! More to come as it has many pages on SAR but how interesting is this? And CTIA denies/ignores/spins all of this? Although Snowden repeated how many times "I am not telling you they are safe"? I think my son added that to top of http://www.cabta.org today. "Let me be very clear, the industry has not said once, not once, that cell phones are safe". Quote from CTIA on Sept. 20, 2010. In all fairness he was saying it is the governing agencies that claim they are safe. Let's not go there! The FCC actually changed the website the day of the Burlingame meeting. It had stated as a precaution one should buy a lower sar phone (seen on Sept. 19). On Sept. 20 that was gone! What a coincidence! Also, for those of you that watched the Burlingame hearing, the Maine legislator spoke to Senator Brannigan and Representative Stuckey yesterday and NO ONE from the CTIA (including Mr. Snowden) ever got back to them about the language in the user guides as Mr. Snowden claimed he did. Please share with others. People need to know.


Ellen Marks
Director of Government & Public Affairs Environmental Health Trust
http://www.environmentalhealthtrust.org



Informant: Iris Atzmon

--------

Blackberry Torch Product Information

Page 23-24 mentions pregnant women and lower abdomens of teenagers.

http://docs.blackberry.com/en/smartphone_users/deliverables/18620/BlackBerry_Torch_9800_Smartphone-Safety_and_Product_Information-T43156-696706-0806024453-001-US.pdf


Ellie Marks


Informant: Martin Weatherall

--------

BlackBerry: Keep Our Phones Away From Your Body

http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/10/15/blackberry-keep-our-phones-away-from-your-body/


Informant: CGamba



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=exposure
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=exposure
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Blackberry
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Blackberry
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Smartphone
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Smartphone
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=children
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=children
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=brain+tumor
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumor
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=brain+tumour
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=brain+tumour
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Ellen+Marks
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Ellen+Marks
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Christiane+Tourtet
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Christiane+Tourtet

Cell Phones: Our Kids At Risk?

http://www.abcarticledirectory.com/Article/Cell-Phones-Our-Kids-At-Risk-/835880


Note: After an EMF article written in the Wire Report, the reporter received some criticism. Here is the reporter's assessment of the situation and then there is a reply to him.

The Wire Report

As a journalist with daily deadlines I hope you can appreciate that I always don't have the time to give more complex stories, like this one, the full research they sometimes deserve. At the end of the day, I need to have something published because we are a small publication and have subscribers who count on daily content.

The impetus for this particular story was the decision by the Bloc Québécois to look into forming a sub-committee to explore the health risks associated with RF signals. That is what I tried to focus on. As I'm sure you know, SEMO and the Bloc have counted on the Bioinitiative Report to support their claims that RF signals are indeed harmful.

When I spoke with Dr. Daniel Krewski, possibly the top researcher in Canada on the potential cancer risks associated with cell phones, he told me that he had never heard of the report. If you were in my shoes, this would surely raise a few questions and probably a little skepticism.

So I wrote my story to the best of my abilities with the information I had at the time.

What I found, at least, was that most authoritative research had not found any concrete links between cell phone use and cancer. If you read the article again, however, I'm sure you'll notice that I also said that research on the long-term effects of cell phone use and the health risks associated with children has been rather slim and inconclusive to date. I don't think I gave the telecom industry a free ride, but you may disagree.

If you want to send some more research my way it would be appreciated. Depending on how this sub-committee goes I'm sure there could be some good opportunities for a follow-up.

Best,

Jonathan

By the way, we are actually independent.The Wire Report is owned by The Hill Times Publishing, a respected independent publisher that also publishes The Hill Times newspaper and Embassy.

I have no ties to the telecom or broadcasting industries, apart from the fact that I cover them on a daily basis.


Reply

Dear Mr. -------------,

I must admit with embarassment that I copied you by accident with me initial email. I thank you very much for the courtesy you extended by explaining your situation. I appreciate it greatly. If I could make one suggestion in response to your statement that you must write something because your readers expect content, it would be that it might be preferable to write nothing than to write something that is misleading. I hope to give you further information that, I also hope, you might provide to your readers as a follow-up.

Please allow me first to present some additional research for you to consider, as requested. Attached is a petition I submitted to the Auditor General of Canada. In it you will find many studies which show that damage is caused by RF radiation as well as evidence to support my assertion that Dr. Krewski and members of Health Canada are associated with the telecommunication industry. If you wish to see the responses,which in no way question my assertions but, to the contrary confirm them, just google my petition (#255 and #255b). Should you have difficulty finding them I would be happy to send them to you.

There are no doubt many who would dispute your consideration of Dr. Krewski as one of Canada's top, if not the top, researcher into cellphones. He has been involved with the Interphone Study, the results of which are dubious due to its funding by the industry. Other countries (there were 13 involved in the endeavour) have reached conclusions that differ widely, and the report has been delayed due to the pressure being brought to bear by the industry.

I must admit amazement with Dr. Krewski's statement that he has never heard of the BioInitiative Report. This is a compilation of 2000 peer-reviewed studies done by independent, credible scientists from around the world over a number of years. Many have considered it to be a vital addition to the discussion of RF exposure. What makes his statement even more confusing is that the BioInitiative Group has corresponded with Dr. Krewski, urging him and his colleagues to produce their research because people are being harmed during the delay of several years. Pls. see the link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/8966125/Principal-Investigators-of-Interphone-Study-Groups . Also there are numerous articles in various newspapers and journals citing both the Interphone Group (Dr. Krewski) and the BioInitiative Group. One example: http://groups.google.com/group/mobilfunk_newsletter/browse_thread/thread/931c9426a56862ed. Perhaps Dr. Krewski's memory has been affected by his cellphone usage! (joke?) Or perhaps it's just one more example of Dr. Krewski not being entirely forthcoming.

If my conclusion that yours was an industry newsletter is incorrect, please forgive me. The title "The Wired Report" and the information in the article may have mislead me. We who are fighting to get the standards for exposure to RF in Canada to the same level as most of the major countries of the world have become cynical due to lack of media and government support which is resulting in RF becoming the 21st century cigarette.

And last, but not least, there are many across Canada who are most grateful to the Bloc Quebecois for taking this stance and for bringing this important issue to Parliament's attention. Hopefully others will lend their support so that real change can be brought to Health Canada.

Should you wish additional information or substantiation of any of my comments, please do not hesitate to let me know.

Best regards,
Sharon Noble


Mysterious garage door dilemma
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Mysterious-garage-door-dilemma/1l9YTW9uxkSan2hL85OYEA.cspx


Re http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Mysterious-garage-door-dilemma/1l9YTW9uxkSan2hL85OYEA.cspx

Hi Janet

It is not just garage doors that radiofrequencies are interfering with.

The attached document gives you a good idea of what they are doing to people.

If you want further information on this problem, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely

Martin Weatherall
Co Director WEEP
http://www.weepinitiative.org



http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=RF+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=RF+radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=children
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=children
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=health+risk
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+risk
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=cancer
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Bioinitiative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Bioinitiative
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Interphone
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Interphone
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Health+Canada
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Health+Canada
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Krewski
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sharon+Noble

Bürgerwelle News

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Hummelpelz als Elektrosensor:...
baubiologie magazin Könnte es sein, dass für...
Starmail - 20. Sep, 05:54
Pläne für Funkmast...
Freie Presse Viele würden erwarten, dass sich...
Starmail - 20. Sep, 05:51
Nationale Kundgebung...
https://groups.google.com/ forum/#!topic/mobilfunk_ne wsletter/GB6P8PPAsFA http s://www.buergerwelle-schwe iz.org/themen/strahlung_ge sundheit/antennen/national e_stop_5g_kundgebung_nr._2 _bunde.html 5G...
Starmail - 19. Sep, 08:07
Unmut über den...
Onetz.de Mit dem Sendemast vor der Ferienwohnung sei...
Starmail - 19. Sep, 05:51
26-year-old dies after...
https://groups.google.com/ forum/#!topic/mobilfunk_ne wsletter/DBGdOIm4g0E Mo re...
Starmail - 18. Sep, 13:38

Status

Online seit 3591 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 20. Sep, 05:54

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Credits

Knallgrau New Media Solutions - Web Agentur f?r neue Medien

powered by Antville powered by Helma


xml version of this page
xml version of this page (summary)

twoday.net AGB