The Interphone Protocol tells the researcher the procedures they must follow

Hi Joel,

Clearly, by just examining the authors who challenged your team's findings, you hit a very raw nerve. Shakespeare said it best, "The lady doth protest too loudly." You and your coauthors should be proud. (attached)

I must say your and your colleagues' paper brought out the Interphone gang. Most, if not all of the authors on the first letter are authors of the German Interphone studies. Joachim Schüz is also an author on the German and Danish Interphone studies, and the Danish Cohort study of cellphone subscribers.

This latter study, totally funded by industry, found being a cellphone subscriber significantly protects the subscriber from all cancers, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, other dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis (>10 years), epilepsy (men), lung cancer (men), cancer of the larynx, buccal cavity/pharynx cancer (men), esophageal cancer (men), stomach cancer (men), kidney cancer (men), pancreatic cancer (men), and brain tumors (>10 years). This is not reported as protection but rather as not risk.

Give me a call and I can tell you more.

The second Letter is authored by two industry types. Again, "The lady doth protest too loudly." Interestingly, while the protest they are careful not to interfere with the Interphone researches they say nothing about industry's interference in the Interphone Protocol (both the published portion, and the more important unpublished portion) which tells the researcher the procedures they must follow.

Stang, the author of the second Letter is the lead author on the first eye cancer study that reported a significant, 4/2 fold risk of eye cancer but, working with Schüz's Interphone study data, Stang effectively denounced his previous study using Interphone Protocol procedures. They used the same controls used in the Schuz's German Interphone glioma & meningioma study. Besides have a set of results showing statistically significant protection, this second Stang study had such a low control participation rate (56%) that it was a set up for major selection bias problems. Doesn't this sound familiar?

What truly amazes me about the Stang letter is how they challenge cut-off points ("Myung et al arbitrarily used a cutoff of 7 points to distinguish between low bias and high bias studies.") when Stang et al.'s use of cut-offs in their second study was beyond arbitrary. In their second study where they found no risk of eye cancer, they used the controls of the German Interphone glioma study and the cutoff points chosen were from these same controls. In a email sent to Stang shortly after the publication of his second study I asked him, "The cut points you used are the same cut points used in the German Interphone study on the risk of brain tumors (glioma and meningioma) from cellphone use. This German study based its cut points on the cellphone use of controls, but was studying the risk of cases. Further, in the German Interphone study 61% glioma controls and 69% o meningioma controls had never used a cellphone. And in your study the number of controls who had never used a cellphone was a remarkably different 17% and 24% depending on the control group. Finally you were studying the risk of uveal melanoma from cellphone use. If uveal melanoma cases use cellphone substantially different than the controls from a very different study, then this would introduce unnecessary bias. Why not use cut points based on the use of uveal melanoma cases?" No adequate answer was received.

Lastly, and with respect, your comments about the COSMOS study you write, "We are looking forward to the results of the COSMOS (cohort study of mobile phone use and health), as this study may provide stronger evidence about the health effects of mobile phones." Not only are cohort studies inappropriate for rare diseases such as brain tumor, but the COSMOS study is having such major recruitment problems that Germany has already withdrawn from the study. In the UK only 5.1% have consented to be in the study, and for all countries (UK, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Holland) 18% have consented to be in the study. (See COSMOS study attachments; note particularly slide 28 from the Germans). Additionally the COSMOS study is another industry funded study. In my view, the purpose of the COSMOS study is that we should wait for 25 years to get the definitive answer. By that time, the definitive answer will be available by counting bodies.

[ http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/elliott_uk_cosmos_11_09.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/schuz_danish_uk_cosmos_11_30_09.pdf ]

My best regards,

PS: You have my permission to forward this email to your co-authors.



Researchers: Customers drive our professional reviews

Some years ago there were rumors that he had lost loads of the Cancer Society money on the stockmarket.

----- Original Message -----

From: Henrik Eiriksson
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 1:15 PM
Subject: Researchers: Customers drive our professional reviews

Hi Iris Atzmon,

from Denmark yesterday:
Researchers: Customers drive our professional reviews

"There may be reason to be wary when scientists speak as independent experts. New survey shows that scientists are influenced by their customers - both private and public."
See here, via Google-translate:
I don't have time to clean up the translation right now, but I think it's clear enough for a start.
(original link: http://ing.dk/artikel/107885-forskere-kunder-styrer-vores-faglige-vurderinger )

Maybe Mr J. Schüz and the Danish Cancer Society would like to comment?? No? ..ok, I thought not ;-).

Oh, I just heard the the director of the Danish Cancer Society (D.C.S), Mr. Arne Rolighed, is stepping down. The media says it's because his 10 year contract has ended (that's what Repacholi said aswell). Some years ago there were rumors that he had lost loads of the Societies money on the stockmarket, and shortly afterwards there came some strange initiatives from the D.C.S, like the first "no risk" Danish Cohort study, a campaign for recycling old cellphones to developing countries and a nationwide money-collection in support of D.C.S (they called it "support the battle against cancer", but we know it's all for their profit).


Hoffnung auf den Europäischen Gerichtshof

Streit um Funkmast geht weiter


Eine Gruppe von Bürgern wehrt sich gegen den Funkmast bei Niederwihl. Soeben hat sie beim Landtag zwei Petitionen eingereicht. Ein Anlieger zieht im Kampf ...


Hoffnung auf den Europäischen Gerichtshof


Görwihl. Auftraggeber war der Mobilfunkanbieter O2. Der Mast ist mehr als 40 Meter hoch. Er enthält eine GSM-Anlage für den Handy-Netzbetrieb. Weitere Anlagen wurden nicht installiert, weil die Stromversorgung nicht ausreicht. Anlieger haben die Verlegung einer ...



Bürgerwelle News



Aktuelle Beiträge

Opponents of the mobile...
https://groups.google.com/ g/mobilfunk_newsletter/c/f 74KJfe8zaY Telecoms...
Starmail - 2. Mär, 15:52
Calls to scrap plans...
https://groups.google.com/ g/mobilfunk_newsletter/c/K NREMTpnLU8 -------- Phon e...
Starmail - 2. Mär, 15:38
Kanton Aargau: Handyverbot...
SRF Handys, soziale Medien und der Umgang damit seien...
Starmail - 2. Mär, 15:33
Unfall wegen Handy am...
Presseportal Ein Krankenwagen musste jedoch nicht...
Starmail - 2. Mär, 15:30
Schädlich fürs...
Schweizer Illustrierte So ein Handy wirkt Wunder:...
Starmail - 2. Mär, 15:27


Februar 2024
Januar 2024
Dezember 2023
November 2023
Oktober 2023
September 2023
August 2023
Juli 2023
Juni 2023
Mai 2023
April 2023
März 2023
Februar 2023
Januar 2023
Dezember 2022
November 2022
Oktober 2022
September 2022
August 2022
Juli 2022
Juni 2022
Mai 2022
April 2022
März 2022
Februar 2022
Januar 2022
Dezember 2021
November 2021
Oktober 2021
September 2021
August 2021
Juli 2021
Juni 2021
Mai 2021
April 2021
März 2021
Februar 2021
Januar 2021
Dezember 2020
November 2020
Oktober 2020
September 2020
August 2020
Juli 2020
Juni 2020
Mai 2020
April 2020
März 2020
Februar 2020
Januar 2020
Dezember 2019
November 2019
Oktober 2019
September 2019
August 2019
Juli 2019
Juni 2019
Mai 2019
April 2019
März 2019
Februar 2019
Januar 2019
Dezember 2018
November 2018
Oktober 2018
September 2018
August 2018
Juli 2018
Juni 2018
Mai 2018
April 2018
März 2018
Februar 2018
Januar 2018
Dezember 2017
November 2017
Oktober 2017
September 2017
August 2017
Juli 2017
Juni 2017
Mai 2017
April 2017
März 2017
Februar 2017
Januar 2017
Dezember 2016
November 2016
Oktober 2016
September 2016
August 2016
Juli 2016
Juni 2016
Mai 2016
April 2016
März 2016
Februar 2016
Januar 2016
Dezember 2015
November 2015
Oktober 2015
September 2015
August 2015
Juli 2015
Juni 2015
Mai 2015
April 2015
März 2015
Februar 2015
Januar 2015
Dezember 2014
November 2014
Oktober 2014
September 2014
August 2014
Juli 2014
Juni 2014
Mai 2014
April 2014
März 2014
Februar 2014
Januar 2014
Dezember 2013
November 2013
Oktober 2013
September 2013
August 2013
Juli 2013
Juni 2013
Mai 2013
April 2013
März 2013
Februar 2013
Januar 2013
Dezember 2012
November 2012
Oktober 2012
September 2012
August 2012
Juli 2012
Juni 2012
Mai 2012
April 2012
März 2012
Februar 2012
Januar 2012
Dezember 2011
November 2011
Oktober 2011
September 2011
August 2011
Juli 2011
Juni 2011
Mai 2011
April 2011
März 2011
Februar 2011
Januar 2011
Dezember 2010
November 2010
Oktober 2010
September 2010
August 2010
Juli 2010
Juni 2010
Mai 2010
April 2010
März 2010
Februar 2010
Januar 2010
Dezember 2009
November 2009


Online seit 5217 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2. Mär, 15:52

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.


Knallgrau New Media Solutions - Web Agentur f?r neue Medien

powered by Antville powered by Helma

xml version of this page
xml version of this page (summary)

twoday.net AGB