Regarding the article by Imelda in Cork, Ireland.
Perhaps a valid testament could be obtained from a willing
member of the
Psychiatric world explaining why they are wont to practice
'trans-cranial' emf radiation as a form of some ill-defined
specifically for people diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic.
That is exactly the treatment that has been prescribed here
Canada. IE: trans-cranial emf. In the dark ages it was known
treatment' or EST.
Could this possibly be a case of applying the untested and
quasi-science of induced emf to cure or combat an affliction
sensitivity) that is as yet largely denied or ignored?
Now that would be outrageously disgraceful wouldn't it. Wouldn't
My sincere empathy to Imelda.
The high court decision from yesterday is to remove until
the end of
this year the non-transmitting antennas, the environmemt quality
decision is to remove the non - transmitting antennas with
of Bezeq, the state and...the villages council.
Ehud Ulmert's (trade and industry minister) written commitment
until the end of this year Hillel station will stop operate.
These developments led the residents to withdraw their protest
did not go to a protest tent, they even considered it as their
but expressed their hope that they are not being lied again.
Meanwhile they are being exposed to levels of 90-100 V/m
(40 V/m in a
"good" day). The authorities, in spite of that,
claim that the levels
are about 8 V/m.
The report of the Health ministry states that there is not
excess in the
illness in the villages around Hillel station, therefore it
irrelevant to check if there is a relationship between the
and the radiation...
How did they get to that? Maybe by doing average only with
diagnosed from 1990 in spite of the fact that Porat has cases
1977, and the fact that Zoran was only built in 1992.
Questions: What about the transmitting antennas? they are
which irradiate, not the non- transmitting....And why Zoran
to pay for the non- transmitting antennas? What an absurd.
Anyway - the residents didn't raise these questions and agreed
They keep their right to come back to the court in September.
did you get an answer to the question that you posted on
26 May? I have
been away on leave and in scanning my Yahoo e-mail do not
see a response
to your question. I would be interested to know why you should
worse health effects in winter from your nearby AM tower than
ie why does the power density increase in winter as opposed
density in spring.
If you received a reply I hope the sender will not mind if
you post it
in its entirety because I think that the more knowledge we
all have the
better able we are to fight harmful emr and radio waves. Kind
Cape Town, South Africa
In case you don't get an answer I can only say that water
attract the radiation.
HULK" and EMF
For those of you who have not yet watched the new motion picture
Hollywood, the Hulk, one of the older cartoons out there,
has now been
The story involves all kinds of strong weapons to deal with
cartoon character "The Hulk". This list includeds
tanks, and more.
None of them worked and the military in the story was tossed
toys. Nothing seemed to work..Then one last item was used..
Quote: "He is now between the Electromagnetic Array,
if he moves an
inch, turn on the juice". This means only EMF would take
down the Hulk.
As you look carefully, the Antennas used are the size of the
cellular basestation cones.
As the world is told that towers and phones are safe, once
Hollywood presents emf as a very dangerous device, in this
powerful and deadly then any other on earth.
Message from Gotemf
This is important news. I strongly doubt that this warning
much coverage on the broadcast networks, although I'd expect
some of the
print media to cover it at least once. Please share this info
everyone you know - including the skeptics. Margie
Reaping the whirlwind
Extreme weather prompts unprecedented global warming alert
03 July 2003
In an astonishing announcement on global warming and extreme
the World Meteorological Organisation signalled last night
that the world's
weather is going haywire.
In a startling report, the WMO, which normally produces detailed
scientific reports and staid statistics at the year's end,
record extremes in weather and climate occurring all over
the world in
recent weeks, from Switzerland's hottest-ever June to a record
tornadoes in the United States - and linked them to climate
The unprecedented warning takes its force and significance
from the fact
that it is not coming from Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth,
an impeccably respected UN organisation that is not given
(though environmentalists will seize on it to claim that the
warnings of climate change are being borne out).
The Geneva-based body, to which the weather services of 185
contribute, takes the view that events this year in Europe,
Asia are so remarkable that the world needs to be made aware
The extreme weather it documents, such as record high and
temperatures, record rainfall and record storms in different
the world, is consistent with predictions of global warming.
Supercomputer models show that, as the atmosphere warms, the
only becomes hotter but much more unstable.
"Recent scientific assessments indicate that, as the
continue to warm due to climate change, the number and intensity
extreme events might increase," the WMO said, giving
a striking series
In southern France, record temperatures were recorded in
above 40C in places - temperatures of 5C to 7C above the average.
In Switzerland, it was the hottest June in at least 250 years,
environmental historians said. In Geneva, since 29 May, daytime
temperatures have not fallen below 25C, making it the hottest
In the United States, there were 562 May tornadoes, which
caused 41 deaths.
This set a record for any month. The previous record was
399 in June 1992.
In India, this year's pre-monsoon heatwave brought peak temperatures
45C - 2C to 5C above the norm. At least 1,400 people died
in India due
to the hot weather. In Sri Lanka, heavy rainfall from Tropical
01B exacerbated wet conditions, resulting in flooding and
killing at least 300 people. The infrastructure and economy
south-west Sri Lanka was heavily damaged. A reduction of 20-30
is expected in the output of low-grown tea in the next three
Last month was also the hottest in England and Wales since
average temperatures of 16C. The WMO said: "These record
(high temperatures, low temperatures and high rainfall amounts
droughts) all go into calculating the monthly and annual averages,
which, for temperatures, have been gradually increasing over
"New record extreme events occur every year somewhere
in the globe, but
in recent years the number of such extremes have been increasing.
"According to recent climate-change scientific assessment
reports of the
joint WMO/United Nations Environmental Programme Intergovernmental
on Climate Change, the global average surface temperature
since 1861. Over the 20th century the increase has been around
"New analyses of proxy data for the northern hemisphere
the increase in temperature in the 20th century is likely
to have been the
largest in any century during the past 1,000 years."
While the trend towards warmer temperatures has been uneven
over the past
century, the trend since 1976 is roughly three times that
for the wholeperiod.
Global average land and sea surface temperatures in May 2003
second highest since records began in 1880. Considering land
temperatures only, last May was the warmest on record.
It is possible that 2003 will be the hottest year ever recorded.
hottest years in the 143-year-old global temperature record
have now all
been since 1990, with the three hottest being 1998, 2002 and
The unstable world of climate change has long been a prediction.
the WMO says, it is a reality.
[Also on this site: Bush accused of censorship over global
Informant: Carol Wolman
Omega: By the way - mobile phone radiation contributes also
And Human Rights For All?
By Arianna Huffington
With Saddam's weapons of mass destruction nowhere to be found,
president's Iraq talking points now center on the humanitarian
having ousted the Butcher of Baghdad. His speeches are liberally
with mentions of "mass graves," "torture chambers,"
and encomiums to
"freeing the people of Iraq from the clutches of Saddam
all but doused himself in the sweet-smelling scent of human
put on an Amnesty International t-shirt.
But, OK, let's say we take the president at face value and
buy his new
argument that ending humanitarian crises through military
force is good
foreign policy. Then how can he justify embarking on his first
sub-Saharan Africa next week without including on his itinerary
His five-day visit will include stops in Senegal, Botswana,
Nigeria, and South Africa -- but not the absurdly named Democratic
Republic of Congo, site of what one African expert has labeled
worst humanitarian situation on the entire face of the earth."
You'd think a president willing to send 200,000 U.S. troops
because of Saddam's mass graves might want to check out firsthand
mass graves recently unearthed in the Congo, freshly filled
to 1,000 victims of genocidal massacres. There's your causus
there -- that is, if there is any substance to this new Bush
that evil dictators who abuse their own people must be deposed,
if necessary, even if they pose no imminent threat to the
But I guess the 3.3 million people who have died in the Congo
-- to say nothing of the horror stories of macheted infants,
villages, and soldiers mutilating and even cannibalizing their
are not enough to justify a second muscular application of
the Bush human
rights doctrine. They aren't even enough to motivate the president
squeeze a Congo stopover into his African schedule and bring
much-needed international attention to this massive humanitarian
I'm not talking about making nice with dictators; I'm talking
using the power of his office to help stop the bloodshed.
He also won't be going to war-torn Liberia, a nation of 3
historical ties to America, where 200,000 people have been
million more displaced, disease is running rampant, and beleaguered
citizens are pleading with the United States to intervene.
After 700 people were massacred in a rebel attack on the
capital city of
Monrovia two weeks ago, African leaders called on President
Bush to send
in 2,000 U.S. troops as part of an international peace keeping
Both the Pentagon and the State Department are in favor of
such a move,
but the White House has so far declined to expand its adventures
dictator-eradication to Africa.
Of course, that hasn't stopped the president from paying
lip service to
alleviating the suffering going on there. Just last week he
are determined to help the people of Liberia find the path
to peace." But,
apparently, not determined enough to go to the country himself
facilitate a ceasefire agreement between the warring factions.
Instead, he's dispatched 35 -- that's not a typo, "thirty-five"
troops to the country, as he put it, "solely for the
protecting American citizens and property." Wow, I bet
President Charles Taylor is quaking in his jackboots. Taylor,
murderous regime could teach Saddam a thing or two about torture
mass murder, was last month indicted for war crimes by a U.N.
While trying to drum up outrage at Saddam earlier this year,
president catalogued a list of his atrocities, including mutilation
rape, and proclaimed: "If this is not evil, then evil
has no meaning."
But the president's fly-over of Africa's hearts of darkness,
mutilation and rape, shows that it's his humanitarian rhetoric
Here is true evil, but next week will instead be dominated
by a series
of photo-ops with smiling children and platitudes about the
If more proof of the hypocritical selectivity of Bush's moral
were needed, look no further than the run-up to the invasion
when, in the name of liberating the Iraqi people, the White
linked arms with a host of countries its own State Department
castigated for significant human rights violations -- including
Uzbekistan, Colombia, Georgia, Eritrea, Macedonia, Rwanda,
Ethiopia, Azerbaijan, and the Dominican Republic. Given these
dismal human rights record, maybe we should have called them
Coalition of the Willing to Torture, Execute, and Rape.
The suddenly fashionable humanitarian justification for the
war in Iraq
is nothing more than yet another White House deception designed
the fact that the original justification -- Iraq as an imminent
hasn't panned out.
Which is just too darn bad for the long-suffering souls of
"Bring them on"
would Jefferson do?
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Wants Immunity For Its Soldiers In The World
Informant: Carlos Rovira, Jr.
Informant: Ken Freeland