Interesting info.
My son Henrik found this website by Dr. Andrew
Marino, a disciple of Dr. Robert O. Becker, [ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Robert+O.+Becker
] who wrote the books "The Body Electric" [ http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3500280/
] and "Cross Currents" [ http://omega.twoday.net/stories/2375974/
].
Take a look, he writes about his knowledge of
Repacholi [ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
] (see in link "SOBs" guess who he is pointing at).
But this is very interesting info about
Repacholi. http://www.ortho.lsuhsc.edu/Faculty/Marino/Comments/SOBs.html
Marino's [ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Marino
] homepage is here: http://www.ortho.lsuhsc.edu/Faculty/Marino/Marino.html
Best regards.
Agnes
SOBs at WHO
[ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organization
]
In 1996 the World Health
Organization began what it said was a program "to assess the scientific
evidence of possible health effects of EMF in the frequency range from 0 to 300
GHz" (EMF Project). However, the project was
corrupted from the start because it was controlled by the power- and cell-phone
industries in the industrialized countries. The person placed in charge of the
program by the industries was Michael Repacholi, who had been known for more than 6
years to be a paid
consultant and spokesman for the companies responsible for producing EMF
pollution. It was not realistic to expect that he would conduct an open and
honest inquiry, and his performance in office has been even more miserable than
could have been anticipated based on what was known about his personal views at the time he was
appointed.
During the time he worked
at WHO, Repacholi dealt exclusively with experts on the payroll of cell telephone
companies and power companies. He produced a series of reports and evaluations
that exonerated these industries from any responsibility for human disease
produced by the electromagnetic fields that they generated and dispersed into
the environment. Throughout Repacholi's career at WHO, scientists who disagreed
with EMF-industry positions, as well as members of the public who were
adversely impacted by WHO EMF policies, were structurally excluded from WHO EMF
adjudicatory committees.
The WHO scientific reviews
of EMFs were star-chamber processes in which only pro-industry spokesmen were
heard, and the results of the processes were foreordained. Repacholi gave many
speeches between 1995-2006, but was never held accountable in any serious
dialogue or debate, and was never required to provide any justification for his
extreme position.
I saw Repacholi at the 28th Annual Meeting of the
Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS), which was held in Cancun, Mexico, June
11-15, 2006. It was the first time I had seen him since he testified for the
power industry in Australia in 1990. The Mobile Manufacturers Forum, which
consists of the world's major manufacturers of cellular telephones were "Gold Sponsors" of the BEMS meeting, and Repacholi
was invited to give a talk entitled "Results from 10 Years of WHO's
International EMF Project," which he delivered at a plenary session at the
meeting. Small children may believe that the invitation to Repacholi to present
the talk was unrelated to the "Gold" sponsorship status of the
companies that Repacholi has so vigorously supported for the last decade - I do
not believe it.
Repacholi's talk was a
paean to the activities at the WHO that he guided and controlled. He was proud
of the fact that he had successfully stemmed the tide of concern regarding the
propensity of environmental EMFs to produce cancer and other human diseases,
and had established the principle that man-made environmental EMFs were
harmless. He touted model legislation that he had drafted, and said that he
hoped it would be enacted by various governments so that the fact that
environmental fields were safe would be enshrined in law.
At the end of his talk I rose and said, "Dr. Repacholi, I'm Andrew
Marino from Shreveport, Louisiana. When you say that WHO assesses research
about EMFs, can you tell us exactly who at WHO does that assessing?"
He began his answer by
describing a formal process for considering scientific evidence, but without
naming names. I interrupted him. "Perhaps I wasn't clear. I didn't ask
what the process was from a procedural point-of-view. I would like to know the
names of the human beings who make the judgments regarding the safety of
environmental EMFs."
Again, his answer was
evasive in the sense that it dealt with process, and did not name names. I
interrupted again and said, "I am trying to get at the names of the
individuals, the human beings who make the judgments that are contained in the
WHO reports. Will you please tell me their names?"
For a third time, he
refused to answer, and for good reason. Any names he listed would have been
immediately recognizable as paid consultants or employees of the EMF-producing
industries, including himself.
I think it is no
exaggeration to say that Repacholi is probably responsible for more cases of
human disease than any human being alive today. This reprehensible achievement
stems partly from his limitations as a scientist; he was poorly trained and
essentially inexperienced in the topic in which he has lectured the world for
the last 10 years. At a deeper level, his failing stems from his character,
which is devoid of any sense of justice. What can one say about a man who
encourages human beings, including young children, to chronically irradiate
their brains with electromagnetic fields while telling them the lie that they
are "perfectly safe?"
At the end of July, 2006,
Repacholi retired from his position at WHO as dictator of EMFs. What will
happen to him? Probably, he will be rewarded by his masters as they reward any
servant whose actions pleased them, Mays Swicord for example. Swicord worked
for the Food and Drug Administration for many years where he ostensibly sought
to protect the radiological health of the citizens of the United States, but
actually had a greater interest in protecting the companies who manufacture
microwave ovens. After he left FDA and became the head of research at Motorola.
In that capacity he has consistently extolled the safety of his company's cell
telephones. I predict the same future for Repacholi.
Repacholi announced in
Cancun that his successor would be T. Emilie van Deventer, who has no experience whatsoever
in the area of the biological effects of electromagnetic fields. She is an
electrical engineer who has never even claimed knowledge or experience in the
subject matter about which she will now be in a position to advise the entire
world. The King of Cancer is gone, and we can only hope that she does not
become the Queen of Cancer.
http://www.ortho.lsuhsc.edu/Faculty/Marino/Comments/SOBs.html