THE PITFALLS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE
All political solutions seem to
rest on the assumptions of civility and common decency. Our leadership , which must share our value
systems is indeed interested in addressing our concerns. Why indeed do they
turn a deaf ear to the concerns of individuals who are suffering. Perhaps they
are too busy, perhaps they are uninformed, perhaps it is a conspiracy, perhaps
they are ruled by greed and indifference perhaps it is something else.
Individuals however well intentioned seem to overlook the very obvious
constraints put on them by their biology. The ability to mediate or resolve
disputes rests as much in the limits that their biological evolution has
imposed on them. I commented on how individuals appear to be disingenuous or
for that matter disassociated in their behaviors. One tends to overlook disassociation
as pointing at a more powerful dynamic that shapes so called human
reality. However the constancy of their disassociation seems to be
the driving dynamic, not necessarily our hopes and aspirations.
If they appear disingenuous
than their denial is driving the dynamic. It may put one in the position of
being more creative but at what price. The culture is very schizophrenic
because it is driven by assumptions which in and of themselves are based on our
animal instincts which we do not give credence to, or attempt to resolve. The
problem with problem solving is that the approach in and of itself is
predetermined in outcome by biological and evolutionary constraints. Top
predators have evolved toxic solutions to maintaining their position in the
food chain and their ability to evolve. Never the less the same assumptions
seem to be operating with our technologies. One may be dealing with a mindset
that is more apprepeau to a pit viper than a human, though we give ourselves
too much credit for being human. The issue is that the pit viper based on
its reptilian evolution enjoys being a pit viper. In order to survive and
maintain its niche it will produce toxins in order to survive. It lacks the
ability for introspection. The only way to gain dominance over a snake is
to tap it on the head. Think like a snake charmer and you may come up
with a different set of approaches.
The peculiarity of our evolution
is that the traces of our mammalian domination by reptiles may be playing out
in our subconscious reality. We are still predating on ourselves, using
solutions and approaches that are reptilian in nature. This may apply more
generally to the utilization of most of the technologies that are being
generated today. This is very generally indicated in our utilization of
technologies in warfare, chemistry, concerning the environment,
medicine,economics and more global matters in general. I am not trying to make
some clever argument or provide you with some subtle philosophical insight. If
indeed the drives and aims of individuals are generated from preestablished
translatable nuclei of established behavior and perspective, than these are the
issues that have to be addressed. Social skills are predetermined in the meat
so to speak and these perspectives have to be dealt with.
Historically man has not
transcended in his nature because these issues have not been dealt with or
resolved. As long as the dynamic is in play than the situations will remain the
same regardless of the intentions of the individuals. In a real sense we
need the talents of a scientist with the combined attributes of St. Patrick,
who drove the serpents out.
You could clarify the situation
by asking "why are you acting like a pit viper". This may give some
clarity to the individual whom you are talking to. Some animals predate by
introducing toxic situations into the environment in order to eat. People are
not that dissimilar. Their orientation towards survival and the methodologies
employed speak volumes about what their approaches are and will be. This is not
a judgment but a clarification of the operant conditioning that is being
employed. The notion is that learned behavior is grafted onto these more primitive
vestiges of reflexive or evolutionary behavior patterns. Indeed these issues
have not really been addressed even though we have allegorically referred to
them over and over again, in our literature be it religious or mythologies. Though
the same avenues are explored by marketers and advertisers to gain our
loyalties through subconscious manipulation. It presents a veritable goldmine
of exploitation.
Till we resolve these primitive
vestiges of our evolution which still dominate us, than the outcomes will still
stay the same. Social order will not change because it is operating on a
preestablished set of presumptions that give credence and power to the
established hierarchy of power that we have established. Ask yourself do you
really want a serpent making qualitative decisions for you? Is the rule of law
just a mask so that we can do not deal with the vestiges of our biological
behavior which still rules us? I do not fault God for having made the serpent,
but we may have overlooked that it frames ones perspective and limits our spiritual responsiveness to act
more fully out of Christ’s consciousness!
Please feel free to post this if
you want. I would be interested in your response.
Sincerely
G.
Goldberg, MD