Request for help

HELP!  PLEASE CALL YOUR FEDERAL LEGISLATORS FOR AN EXPLANATION IN WRITING

ABOUT THIS CASE, AND ASK OTHER PEOPLE TO DO THE SAME.
For denouncing racial discrimination in higher education, and under the excuse of an investigation, federal agencies have made of our home a veritable microwave oven. The abuse of electronic surveillance has caused to my children, to myself, and to others, serious physical harm.  My efforts to stop this ongoing aggression through litigation have been fruitless. 

If the law allows this happening to us, then the law allows the same to occur to you and to your loved ones.  Please take the time to read this document and then call your legislator for an explanation in writing about this case and ask how they are going to stop this serious threat to our families, threat that Congress created in the first place. The US Congress has given federal agencies the power to use on our families electronic surveillance devices which were confined for military purposes without providing any safeguards to protect the people against the harmful effects that these technologies have on the human organism. This document points out to conclusive evidence on the federal record showing that abuse of electronic surveillance has caused serious physical harm to my children, to myself and to others.  Congress has left innocent and unsuspecting families at risk of being the subject of a harmful
electronic surveillance.  What is at stake here is the welfare of ourselves and of our families.
Checking the seriousness of this threat is as easy as making a few phone calls.

This document may raise many doubts and may leave many questions unresolved. Please do not close your eyes to my request for help, and let your questions and doubts be resolved by those who are responsible for creating  this problem.

For a long time people though Earth was flat and static while the few, to their convenience, discredited those who knew the truth.  In this case,  those responsible for the abuse have taken advantage of people’s lack of  information on this complex technology, and in the unusual harm that it causes to discredit my claims. Fortunately, your federal legislators are familiar with this problem, and know about the catastrophic effects that abuse of this technology is having on unsuspecting victims, and  fortunately, they have a duty to explain to you the solution to the problem that Congress created in the first place. Your call to the numbers below can spare immense pain and suffering, and can save our lives.
 
Jesus Mendoza Maldonado
2202 E.  28th St.    Mission, Texas 78574  Email jesusm7@hotmail.com
 
US Senator, John Cornyn,  Occidental Tower, 5005 LBJ Freeway, Ste. 1150 Dallas, Texas, 75244-6199, Tel. 972/ 239-1310, Fax: 972/239-2110 US Rep. Ruben Hinojosa,  311 N 15th St. Mcallen, TX 78501  Tel. 956/682-5545  Fax 956/6920141, US Rep. James Sensenbrenner,  United States Congress, Rayburn House Office Building Room 2138,  Washington, D.C. 20515  Tel. 202/225 3951
 
August 2, 2003.
 
Re, request to intervene to stop violations of civil rights.
Jesus Mendoza Maldonado
2202 E.  28th St.    Mission, Texas 78574  Email jesusm7@hotmail.com
US Senator, John Cornyn,  Occidental Tower, 5005 LBJ Freeway, Ste. 1150  
Dallas, Texas, 75244-6199, Tel. 972/ 239-1310, Fax, 972/239-2110
 
Dear Congressman,
I have made a request to your office for help to stop the use of electronic surveillance on my family and on myself because the abuse of electronic surveillance has caused serious physical harm to my children, to myself, and to others, and is impairing my ability to defend myself from the illegality in federal courts. In response to my request for help, US Representative, Ruben Hinojosa, sent an inquiry to the US Department of Justice, asking about my claims that abuse of electronic surveillance had caused me severe physical harm. In response to Congressman Hinojosa’s inquiry, the Federal Bureau of Investigation claimed that my claims were incredible, and no further action was taken. In response to your inquiry that electronic surveillance has aggravated my health condition and has caused serious physical harm to my children and to others, the FBI claims to your office on a letter dated June 20, 2003, that my claims are void of any violations of federal law.

As explained below, the defendant the US Attorney General does not deny the fact that I am the subject of an investigation, and instead claims that the use of electronic surveillance is harmless, and that an injunction represents to the defendant a heavy sanction but without explaining the reasons that support the legitimacy of this investigation.  The malicious electronic surveillance continues undeterred.  As explained below, our health condition is critical, and because of the complexity of this abuse, establishing this illegality through the courts may take a long time, meanwhile, the defendant is taking advantage of my disability to impair further my ability to defend myself from these abuses of power.  I need your help to stop this abusive surveillance  because it is causing us pain, suffering, and serious physical harm. This is my tribulation in brief.

From May 1995, to July 1998, I attended the second largest law school in the country.  During my second year of law school, I presented to law school officials evidence showing how the president of the law school had committed theft of student money, and evidence showing the law school was operating a scheme to defraud more than seventy-percent minorities of their federal student loans, halting their education, while the law school wasgiving away law degrees to its affiliates.  The law school officials did not deny their wrongdoing and instead sent me to perform an Exter-ship with the Hidalgo County District Attorney in Edinburg Texas. In retaliation for denouncing serious corruption of higher education, law school official incited a federal investigation of my activities to discredit my claims and to cause harm. The harassment forced me to withdraw from the law school one month away from finishing my last term of law school there. While in law school, I made the Dean’s List once and I was elected to the Hispanic Law Society for one term. I left the law school in good academic standing and in full compliance with the school’s Honor Code.

On February of 1999, I field a complaint against the law school, some federal agents and others, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Mcallen, Division.  After I filed the complaint, the law school defendants’ offered me leave to finish  my law degree at a Texas law school in exchange of a dismissal of my claims of fraud, discrimination, and retaliation. I refused the offer because the abuse of electronic surveillance during the investigation caused am electrical sensitivity, an unusual injury which results in a painful and debilitating condition.

During a court hearing, and taking advantage of the fact that electrical sensitivities are not widely known, the law school defendants claimed that I was mentally insane at the time I was attending law school, in their efforts to move the case to the State of Michigan. The law school officials failed to bring any instances of irrational or delusional conduct in their response to my second motion for sanctions. The district court denied my motion for sanctions, ordered me no to file motions on the matter, severed the case into two distinct cases, transferred the law school defendants’ case to Michigan, and dismissed the case against the federal agents.

During the litigation on the US District Court for the Western district of Michigan, Southern Division, I submitted evidence of the school defendants’ scheme to defraud minorities of their federal loans, evidence of defendants’ inciting a federal investigation to discredit my claims and to cause harm, evidence showing that my electrical sensitivity has been evaluated by a doctor who is an authority on the matter, evidence showing that electromagnetic surveillance employs harmful electromagnetic radiation to surveil activity even behind walls, evidence showing that overexposure to electromagnetic radiation causes electrical sensitivities and severe physical harm, evidence showing that electrical sensitivities are recognized as a disability by the federal government and by the State of California, and evidence showing that the law school defendants’ took advantage of my unusual injuries to defraud of venue the district court in Mcallen, Texas.  

In denying the law school defendants’ motion to dismiss my claims, the US district judge admonished the law school defendants for failing to engage claims and evidence of their wrongdoing.  (Civil case No. 01-cv-93, docket  entry 139, 142, and 169).

My electrical sensitivity has been evaluated by Dr. William J. Rea, an authority on the matter, and Dr. Alfred Johnson, an expert on electrical sensitivities has found me with nerve damage.  Electrical sensitivities and nerve damage are caused by overexposure to electromagnetic radiation. 

The law school official never attempted to subject me to Psychiatric or Psychological evaluations.  However, my mental state has been evaluated by a psychiatrist familiar with electrical sensitivities and no abnormality was  found.

During April of 2002, an unusual increase in electromagnetic radiation aggravated my precarious health condition and forced me to terminate the telephonic deposition of the law school’s Associate Dean of Students during the second hour. At that time the law school officials attempted to take advantage of my health condition by subjecting me to a deposition under circumstances which represent to me severe physical harm.  I filed a timely motion seeking protection from the defendant’s attempts to use judicial procedures to cause me harm.  The US district court dismissed my claims against the law school defendants after I could not attend the depositions.

On appeal, I submitted conclusive evidence of defendants’ wrongdoing on the underlying suit and evidence showing defendants’ procuring a dismissal by fraud on the federal courts.  The law school defendants’ did not challenge any of the evidence. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth circuit in Cincinnati, Ohio affirmed the dismissal. The evidence of the law school defendants’ corruption remains unchallenged.  (Case No. 02-2095).

During the Summer of 2002, symptoms of my electrical sensitivity, which include pain and swelling of vital organs, aggravated considerably.  During the last months of that year, my children started complaining of pain at night. When my pain was more intense, my three-year-old daughter complained of pain on head and body, while my two-year-old son mumbled complains of pain at the same time he was covering his ears with both hands.   During that time my pain grew in intensity before the telephone rang, during telephonic conversations, when I was doing legal work, and when we had visitors. During January of the year 2003, and during the night time, my children started to scream in pain, their breathing was disturbed at the same time that meters indicated high concentrations of electromagnetic radiation inside the home.

On February 3, 2003, I filed a law suit against the US Attorney General seeking to cease and desist the use of electronic surveillance on my family and on myself, and seeking an order compelling the government to show cause for this investigation. To avoid harm to my family, I stayed at a home in Alton, Texas, after explaining the problem to the owner of the home, a friend of many years. 

Shortly after, the intensity of electromagnetic radiation increased inside and outside the home.   A few days after, members of the family started  complaining of terrible pain, some suffering vomiting and diarrhea. On April 30, 2003, I lost the ability of breathing while taking, and I left the country with the expectation that the Mexican Border could stop all electronic aggression.   That has not been the case.

On May 15, 2003, I presented in the US District court for the Southern District of Texas, Mcallen, Division, witnesses who gave testimony of the harm caused by the electronic surveillance to my children, to myself and to others, testimony of my mental stability, and of my conduct as a law-abiding citizen, and evidence showing that the electronic surveillance is aimed to cause harm. The defendant has not denied conducting an investigation of my activities, and does not claim that my claims are delusional or irrational. The defendant has denied the use of electronic surveillance relying on authority which could permit if the investigation was legitimate, deny all activity of an investigation. (The law enforcement exception to the Freedom of Information Act, and the USA Patriot Act).  The defendant claims that these exposures are part of daily life ignoring uncontroverted evidence on the federal record showing that these technologies employ frequencies with power densities which cause severe physical harm to the human organism, and which are not found on an ordinary environment.
       
On the other hand, the defendant claims that an order to stop this investigation is heavy sanction but without giving a reason supporting the legitimacy of this investigation. The defendant ignores conclusive evidence on the federal record showing that this investigation was incited with the purpose of causing harm, and to discredit my claims against the second largest law school in the country, and which has been aimed to fabricate a crime in order to justify this abuse. The defendant does not ignore that because our debilitated condition, directed electromagnetic energy which others may not perceive, is a continuous torture which is having a lethal effect on us.  The defendant does not ignore the fact that the use of electronic surveillance has been aimed to impair my ability to defend myself from these abuses of power. More distortions of fact are anticipated to justify the tremendous waste of federal resources which can only be justified by activities of terrorism, espionage, or drug dealing.
   
(Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v John Ashcroft,  civil case No. M-03-038).  On May 21, 2003, the US Supreme court denied my request for help.  See In re Mendoza Maldonado, 123 S. Ct. 2089 (2003).
   
On June 3, 2003, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, denied my request for help with the option to reinstate it, if  within sixty days the federal district court has not resolved my request to restrain the government’s use of electronic surveillance.  (In Re Jesus Mendoza Maldonado, case No. 03-20157).  On July 14, 2003, the Magistrate Judge Report states that my claims are frivolous, irrational, and delusional, and recommends  dismissal.

Electronic aggression preys on lack of information, innocence, and blind trust. For many years, directed electromagnetic radiation has been used as a lethal weapon, to retrieve image and sound of activities occurring on vehicles, on public places and even in the privacy of the bedrooms. Electronic radiation has been used to debilitate competition on sports and other events, and as is the case here, to impair the intellectual ability of an individual on critical times. Because of the complexity and  secret nature of these technologies, even the educated struggle to apprehend the import that this technology has on our daily lives, and struggle to imagine how something silent and invisible can be so harmful that can be used for evil purposes.

Without the proper information or the time to read it, the harm caused by these devices seems to be fiction or the product of a serious mental problem. That is precisely what makes possible the lynching of innocents with impunity. It is not difficult to figure out how the unrestricted and unsupervised use of electronic surveillance has deprived us of constitutional rights which have been the product of many decades of hard work.

Technologies similar to technology employed in global positioning systems, personal communication systems, or technology employed in making a cellular, or satellite  call, but with unimaginable frequencies and power densities, which include powerful microwaves, X-rays, laser, infrared and ultraviolet light can be directed from unsuspected places to make even intimate conversation, activities, and anatomy, part of a secret record. 
 
An Anonymous call is sufficient for the several agencies to start an investigation, and any excuse extends the investigation for indefinite time.

Abuse of these technologies amounts to cooking inside-out the organism, and makes the home, the work place, and even the vehicle, a microwave oven, causing catastrophic physical harm to the subject of an investigation, its family, and bystanders. The harm may not be perceived, but may have immediate or delayed effect, and may be confused with common ailments or aging, can aggravate existing health problems, can leave the victim in a vegetative state, and can cause a natural-like-death. The abuse can cause, as is the case here, nerve damage, harm to the neurologic, immunologic, and cardiovascular systems, which in turn have divested our organisms of the ability to tolerate electricity on the environment, causing an electrical sensitivity. The aggression manifestates differently on every organism, as is the case here, the aggression causes pain and swelling of vital organs, breathing problems, sight impairment, convulsions and seizures, memory, speech and concentration impairment.  On  some cases, the aggression may cause unexplained anxiety, bad mood, disorientation, and unusual exhaustion. On most cases, swelling, a natural reaction to the aggression, may not be readily perceived. On this case, I exhibit a visible reaction to exposure to electromagnetic radiation on the left side of my face. On many occasions, the swelling caused by the abuse of electronic surveillance has been severe enough to displace one eye out of its socket. Many times I have seen my children hugging me looking for  protection, and complaining of pain, unable to understand what causes us this terrible pain.  Many times I have seen my children turning around their  beds complaining of pain, and trembling on their sleep, at the time I have 
seizures.

The electronic aggression amounts to a constant poisoning until the organism, as is the case here, loses its ability to recover from the aggression, and enters into the final exhaustion stage.  At that time, as is the case here, further exposure to directed electromagnetic radiation which  otherwise may be safe for others, can be fatal to us.

The United States Congress created this problem, then our federal legislators have a duty to fix it.  In response to the 9-11 tragedy, and to protect the country against terrorism, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act, who gives federal agencies the power to use on the general population electronic surveillance which was reserved only to military purposes. However, Congress failed to provide for mechanisms to protect the people against abuse of these technologies. The USA Patriot Act in conjunction with the several exceptions to the Freedom of Information Act became an irresistible invitation to federal agents to use electronic surveillance in the pursuit of their private agendas, and under the excuse of an investigation.

This case illustrates the fact that there is no consideration on the harm that these technologies cause on the human organisms.  As is the case here, no consideration to harm is taken when a family is exposed to multiple sources of electronic surveillance from different angles at the same time, and even when the family is asleep. This case illustrates the fact that there is no consideration of the effect that these technologies have on children, the sick and the elder, and illustrate the fact that federal investigators can pursue their private and hidden agendas without accountability.

There is strong bipartisan opposition in Congress against giving this power to federal agencies. James Sensenbrenner, US Representative and former chair of the Judicial Committee, has said that these abuses will continue only over his dead body.

Abuse of this technology amounts to bold aggressions, and amounts to lynching with impunity a family in the privacy of their home. Our legislators have a duty to inform and to protect the constituency about these complex technologies, and have a duty to provide for prompt, effective, and efficient mechanisms to stop these abuses, holding accountable those who abuse their power.   Unless our legislators intervene,  these abuses will continue causing immense human suffering to innocent  citizens. Unless your office intervenes in our behalf, this ongoing aggression will have lethal effect on my children, on myself and on others.  

Your prompt attention to this matter is highly appreciated.
 
 Respectfully submitted, Jesus Mendoza 
Maldonado____________________________________________
 
cc, US Rep. R. Hinojosa, US Rep. J. Sensenbrenner.
 
“It is true that you may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all the time, but you can’t fool all the people all  the time” -Abraham Lincoln.