|
* Lawsuit overruled.
European court for Human Rights (24/9/02)
Tramès per Klaus Rudolph (Citizens'
Initiative Omega)
I offer to your personal attention this practical "Guidelines"
based on my own experience as one exposed to microwave radiation at the
appalling distance of "Microwave Bombardment" since 1996 and
owing to my knowledge in the field of industrial research (with several
registered patents) and as Chairman of two companies for over 20 years.
On July 12 1999 the European Commission established under the heading
"Recommendations" the power limits of the ICNIRP. Surprisingly
the whole members of this Commission tendered their resignation on March
16 1999.
May this "Recommendation" cause the practical corruption of
health of thousands of families throughout Europe?
I suggest the 6.5. LAWSUIT OVERRULED. EUROPEAN COURT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
As a person exposed to direct radiation at close range (5 mts.) away from
a base station (children included) I requested help from the European
Court for Human Rights to fight Against: Radiation from a 500 W antenna
power". Lawsuit Nº 49257/99 on June 30 1999.
The following response was sent on September 4 2000 : "According
to article 56 § 2 of the Court Regulation" "The European Court
for Human Rights (Section 4), gathered on July 10 2000 decided, after
deliberation to overrule the referred demand".
And the SCALE 7.5.
Yours faithfully,
Miguel Muntané
Dr. Raymond S. Kasevich, CS Medical Technologies
LLC. "IEEE" Spectrum Opinion 08.2002 "Exposure standards
for electromagnetic radiation do not adequately address current realities".
"These standards are based on conclusions drawn from many experiments
in the decades after World War II. Few of those studies, however, were
designed to study low-level, localized biological effects not linked to
heat. But electromagnetic theory and decades of experiments clearly indicate
that the electromagnetic fields of radio and microwaves can also affect
cells mechanically, without producing significant amounts of heat."
We must remember "microwaves can also affect cells mechanically"
Best regards
Miguel Muntané
Mobile Telephone Health
Concerns Registry (MTHCR)
by Dr. George Carlo
Seed funding for the MTHCR comes from a State of Illinois court order.
While part of the settlement of a class-action lawsuit, the Registry itself
is independent from any current legal actions against the industry and
is in no way intended to be a part of any future legal actions. The Registry's
purpose is solely for consumer protection and scientific study.
A passive reporting system, the MTHCR tracks and counts information voluntarily
provided by cell phone users, particularly those who believe they are
experiencing health effects associated with wireless phones. Considered
an integral part of post-market surveillance, this Registry is the
first step in consumer protection and public health intervention and will
help direct future research of potential health effects related to cell
phone use.
Launched and overseen by Dr. George Carlo, one of the world's leading
experts on cell phone health risks, the Registry is operating under the
Science and Public Policy Institute, a non-profit organization. From 1993
through 2001, Dr. Carlo, a public health scientist and epidemiologist,
ran the $28 million cell phone surveillance and research effort funded
by the wireless industry. A continuation of that research effort, the
Registry was initially proposed by Dr. Carlo to the wireless industry
in 1998. At that time, the wireless industry chose not to support it.
Once fully established, the MTHCR will be turned over to appropriate public
health officials for them to operate.
Registries are proven to provide an important initial glimpse into the
effects of specific exposures in a population and can play a significant
role in the overall scientific process. The structure and function of
the Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Registry is similar to those of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as pharmaceutical
and chemical companies.
Every quarter, the aggregate information collected through the Registry
will be studied through a standard analysis protocol. For example, based
on the U.S. population data and demographic profile of the participants
in the Registry, an expected number of cases with a particular disease,
such as leukemia, will be determined. If the actual number of cases with
leukemia in the Registry exceeds the expected number, we will forward
our quarterly report on leukemia and a letter requesting further research
to key organizations with the ability to study leukemia and mobile phone
use. These organizations might include the National Cancer Institute and
the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Through this process, our goal is to
provide valuable consumer protection information.
http://www.health-concerns.org/
Concerning protection devices Iris Atzmon
<atzmonh@bezeqint.net>
asks:
Can you raise the question for someone who understands, about http://www.earthpulse.com/
this Cell/Wave Guard, (cell phone protection) I am curious to know if
they have a good scientific base, and also Micro Shield, which an engineer
who suffered from the cell phone, invented and also argues for scientific
base.
All the best
Iris
|
