|
Image
1. Spring 1997
Image 2. Now
|
Visual
demo of effects...
Hi Klaus
In the juxtaposed images below you see how I looked during
Spring of 1997 when I was suffering severe reactions to the
antipsychotic
medication I was medically ordered to take and a slot machine
image of me taken yesterday. I think this visual evidence
points up how shocking it is to misdiagnose patients presenting
with EHS symptoms as psychotics.
On commencement of the anti-psychotic medication, I have
a photo that
shows I looked just a younger version of how I appear now.
You are welcome to post it for all.
Best, Imelda, Cork, Ireland.
Industry
Canada Tower Review
Klaus to further remind you and your subscibers, there is
a Tower Review
Committee that is accepting information from people regarding
tower
placements. I would really like to see all that feel they
are affected
and also those that feel that local government should have
more
control,write in their suggestions,complaints.They need not
live in
Canada antenna@unb.ca
I have information that they are setting up a review panel
for August
and September to look at electromagnetic sensitivity and misdiagnoses.
I
will let you know when I have conformation. Regards Robert
Riedlinger
Allan
Rock Announces National Antenna Tower Policy Review Committee
OTTAWA, March 28, 2003 - Allan Rock, Minister of Industry,
today
announced the appointment of the National Antenna Tower Review
Committee. The Committee, consisting of municipal officials,
as well as
industry, health and academic experts, will be chaired by
David A. Townsend, Professor of Law at the University of New
Brunswick.
"New, modern procedures for placing antenna towers must
embrace
community involvement and expand the economic and social benefits
of
wireless, broadcast and wireless broadband technologies across
Canada,"
said Minister Rock. "The national antenna tower review
will ensure that
the voices of Canadians are heard in the development of those
procedures. I look forward to receiving the results of the
public
consultation and the Chair's recommendations to ensure a fair,
balanced
antenna tower policy for the future."
The other municipal officials, and industry, health and academic
experts
on the Committee are: Rod Dobell, Professor Emeritus of Public
Policy at
the University of Victoria; Mary McBride, an epidemiologist
at the
British Columbia Cancer Agency; Frank Leonard, Mayor of Saanich,
British
Columbia; Nick Makale, Chair of the City of Calgary's Telecommunication
Ad Hoc Committee; Roger Poirier, Executive Director of the
Wireless
Information Resource Centre and President of RBP Associates;
Christine Racine, urban planning consultant in Montréal;
and
William (Bill) Rowat, President of the Railway Association
of Canada.
In recent years, the public's demand for broadcast and wireless
services
has caused a substantial increase in infrastructure, including
the
number of antenna towers being erected across Canada. The
rules
governing these towers fall under the Radiocommunication Act,
which is
administered by Industry Canada.
Professor Townsend and the Committee will consult with citizens,
communities and companies on improvements in the policy and
siting
procedures for antenna tower placement. This review will examine
issues,
including:
-How can the local consultation process regarding the siting
of a
specific tower be improved?
-What are the most appropriate time frames for the processes
of
approving and resolving debates surrounding specific tower
placements?
-What means are available to readily identify whether proposed
installations may create radiofrequency fields in excess of
established
exposure limits in areas where people live and work?
-What information would most benefit concerned members of
the public and
how should it be provided?
-How and to what extent can tower sharing be utilized in order
to reduce
the total number of towers?
-Can protocols be arranged between local land-use authorities
and
antenna proponents regarding the planning and siting of antenna
structures, visual guidelines and dispute resolution mechanisms?
A backgrounder concerning the antenna tower policy review
process is
attached, as is biographical information on the Chair and
Committee
members. Individuals or organizations wishing to make a submission
to
the review can send their comments to antenna@unb.ca or fax
the Antenna
Consultation Office at (506) 453-4548.
For more information, please contact:
Selena Beattie
Office of Allan Rock
Minister of Industry
(613) 995-9001
Media Relations
Industry Canada
(613) 943-2502
Backgrounder
National Antenna Tower Policy Review
Current procedures used to determine tower placements
Environment - Industry Canada requires that all proposals
be compliant
with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act to ensure that
an
installation will have no significant adverse environmental
effects.
Radiofrequency fields - Industry Canada sets the requirements
for the
safety of radiocommunication equipment in Canada. For this
purpose,
Industry Canada had adopted the radiofrequency emission limits
outlined
in Health Canada's Safety Code 6 guidelines. All radiocommunication
devices must meet this safety standard.
Land use consultations - The Department has instituted land-use
consultation processes to ensure that municipalities and other
land-use
authorities are made aware of proposed installations prior
to
construction. Once a particular municipality is informed of
a proposal,
it should have 30 days to make its views known and another
90 days to
consult with citizens. Parties are encouraged to work together
to
prepare solutions that minimize community impact, including
sharing
existing antenna structures where possible.
Aeronautical obstruction clearance - Industry Canada requires
proponents
to ensure their towers are first reviewed by Transport Canada
to ensure
they pose no hazard to air navigation.
Specific issues which may guide the consultation
-Improving the local consultation process regarding the siting
of a
specific tower to reduce the incidence of surprise, which
can accompany
the construction of new antenna towers.
-Defining the most appropriate time frames for the processes
of
approving and resolving debates surrounding specific tower
placements.
-Determining the best means available to readily identify
whether a
proposed installation may create radiofrequency fields in
excess of
established exposure limits in areas where people live and
work.
-Determining the most useful and helpful information and the
best means
of providing it to concerned members of the public.
-Assessing how and to what extent towers can be shared in
order to
reduce their total number.
-Establishing the best protocols for local land-use authorities
and
antenna proponents that embrace the planning and siting of
antenna
structures, visual guidelines and dispute-resolution mechanisms.
Date Modified: 2003-03-28 (excerpt)
http://www.ic.gc.ca/cmb/welcomeic.nsf/0/85256a220056c2a485256cf700561c10?OpenDocument
Re:
Why Changes in AM Field strength Winter/Summer
Hi,
field strength from any transmitter will vary with changes
in the
electromagnetic environment. Put simply the amount of water
in soil,
state of vegitation in it's growing season, even level in
a near by lake
will effect it and remember at the bottom end of the Medium
Wave (MF) a
wave is 550 meters long, at the top end 200 meters, and in
general
anything within 10 wave lengths is very relivent (i.e 3.5
miles)!.
Another major effect is enhanced skywave reflection in winter.
A station
up to 2000 miles away on a winter's night can effect measurements
due
to strong ionosperic reflection by the "D" layer.
This is well known to broadcast engineers who have to make
their
ajustments when local and remote signals in the "Medium
wave" reach a
minimum. When conducting ajustments on Radio Caroline the
famed
off-shore so called "PIRATE" radio on 1332 Khz we
had to wait to 3 am
local time when most of the East Europeans closed down.
In the same way with a specal "low angle" folded
monapole it was
possable to put a signal into the English North East Coast
(Newcastel
Middelsbrough Hull etc) which totaly drowned out a local goverment
run
station runing 5Kw PEP and also (by skywave, at night) an
east European
Soviet station 3000 miles away running 100Kw.
Our output never exeeded 20 Kilowatts due to power limitations
of our
generators. So just because you are measuring a power level
is not to
say it is from any given structure.
Again a passive structure "tuned" to a given frequency
will tend even if
"un-powered" to both capture radiation and re-radiate
it.
Thus the concept of a "no-radiating" antenna sounds
like so much
mis-information. Best regards, dja.
Dave.J.Aldridge,Spirals, Electromagnetic Hazard Consultant,
Cloonfane,
Charlestown, Ireland.
ScientificAmerican.com:
Antennas Get Smart
Libby, Janet and Omega,
I have just found the cell towers Smart Antennas article
in the July
Scientific American magazine. This article is a must for all
web sites
and all of the people that want to understand the new and
old cell tower
antennas. Please pass this information to all so that everybody
can get
the magazine.
Regards Del.
July 2003 issue
ANTENNAS
GET SMART
By Martin Cooper
Adaptive antenna arrays can vastly improve wireless communications
by
connecting mobile users with virtual wires...
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?SID=mail&articleID=000853F1-DD7F-1EDC-8E1C809EC588EF21
Informant: Delbert Parkinson
Struggle
with the City Officials and Sprint in Berkeley, CA
Dear Fellows;
Tough times in Berkeley, California. Neighbors are struggling
with both
the City Officials and Sprint. Please read more here:
http://www.berkeleydaily.org/article.cfm?issue=07-04-03&storyID=16944
Please write to the following people and ask them to remove
the illegal
antennas.
mayor@ci.berkeley.ca.us
(Berkeley Mayor, Mr. Tom Bates)
spring@ci.berkeley.ca.us
(Council Member, Dona Spring)
clerk@ci.berkeley.ca.us
(City Clerk)
Your support is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Radi
Major
investigative reporting on 12 successful cancer cures and
how they
were, step-by-step suppressed
You may be interested to know that a former US politician,
Daniel Haley,
with the financial assistance of the Washington-based National
Foundation for Alternative Medicine, spent over 4 years compiling
facts
associated with 11 confirmed cancer cures and the elaborate
means taken
by various entities in suppressing and manipulating this critical
information.
The result of this investigation is a book, The Politics of
Healing -
the suppression and manipulation of American Medicine, which
remains
privately published at this time.
The book is introduced by Dr. Julian Whitaker, prominent
leader in
alternative medicine, who states, "Daniel Haley has written
a very
important book about the medical profession, detailing the
struggles
between good and evil as no one ever has before. Incredible
as
these stories are, they are true!"
The late Ruth Montgomery, best-selling author and well-known
former
journalist says: "A hair raising account of how the U.S.
government is
blocking promising health improvements, including cancer cures,
that are in competition with our giant pharmaceutical companies.
Every
American citizen should be concerned. A frightening and well-researched
scenario on the FDA and its policies of suppression. It seems
unvelievable that this is happening in America!"
Berkley Bedell, former Congressman who originated the idea
for the
Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM) says: "This book
could only have
been written by someone with political experience. Former
New York State
Assemblyman Daniel Haley documents the suppression of new
medical
treatments if these come from other than conventional sources.
I spent
12 years in Congress. Too often, we did not have sufficient
facts to
make the right decisions, and certainly not the facts which
this book
clearly points out."
Attorney James Turner, Chair of Citizens for Health says:
"Money, power,
and the betrayal of the Hippocratic Oath ("First, Do
No Harm") could be
the subtitle of this book, now that FDA-approved pharmaceutical
drugs
are one of the top causes of death in the U.S.. Laws need
to be changed
to put an end to this disaster. This book is a powerful wake-up
call for
all Americans."
The book describes: The Hoxsey treatment, the Koch formula,
Rife
technology, Krebiozen treatment, DMSO, Colostrum, 714-X by
Gaston
Naessens, several electromedicine advances by Nobel nominee
Dr. Robert
Becker and by Dr. Daniel Kirsch, Hydrazine Sulfate, Dr. Burzynski's
anti-neoplastons and Cesium salt therapy. The book also indicates
the
resources available for these therapies.
The 481 page book is available from the PACE, Inc. at
pacenet@canada.com. The cost is US$ 24.95 + $7.00 shipping
to the U.S.
and possessions, + $12.00 worldwide. In Canada, the book costs
C$ 38.95
+ $7.50
shipping + GST of 7%. VISA/Mastercard/cheque/money orders
accepted.
PACE Inc. - 100 Bronson Avenue, Suite 1001, Ottawa, Ontario
K1R 6G8
Canada. (613) 236-6265.
Omega
links:
DECLARATION
OF JAMES T. KIMBALL
http://www.liquid-deprenyl.com/DECLARATIONofJamesTKimball2003.htm
"WHERE
IS YOUR COURAGE?"
SPEECH OF HON. BERKLEY BEDELL TO NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE
COMMITTEE,
DEC. 14, 1993:
http://www.ralphmoss.com/html/bedell.shtml
WALKING NORTH ON A SOUTHBOUND TRAIN, PT. 2*
by David W. Orr**
[Continued from RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH NEWS #766.]
See
http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega231.htm
>>>
http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?fetch=6889
What is to be done? To that question there can be no simple
or
definitive answer, but I do think there are some obvious places
to
begin. The first step requires that we take back public words
such as
conservative and patriot, which have been coopted and put
to no good or
accurate use. How is it, for example, that the word conservative
came to
describe those willing to run irreversible risks with the
Earth?
Intending to conserve nothing, they are not conservatives
but vandals
now working at a global scale. How have those driving their
sport
utility vehicles to the mall, sporting two American flags
and a "God
bless America" bumper sticker come to regard themselves
as patriots?
They are not moved by authentic patriotism at all, but by
self
indulgence. For that matter how has the great and noble word
liberal
been demeaned and slandered as the height of political and
intellectual
folly? Unable to defend the integrity of words, we cannot
defend the
earth or anything else.
The integrity of our common language, however, depends a
great deal on
the cultivation of discerning intelligence among the public,
and that
requires better education than we now offer. But education
has been
whittled down to smaller purposes of passing tests and ensuring
large
"lifetime earnings" in some part of the global economy.
What passes for
education has become highly technical and specialized, little
of which
is aimed to draw out the full human stature of young people.
We've
become a nation of specialists and technicians, not broadly
educated and
discerning people. Scholars have been too intent on developing
"professional knowledge," arcane theories, and complicated
methodologies, instead of broad knowledge useful to the wider
public.
Consequently, fewer and fewer people know history, how the
world works
as a physical system, or the rudiments of the constitution,
and fewer
have a respectable political philosophy. We are a people ripe
for the
plucking.
This leads to a third point. We do not have an environmental
crisis so
much as a political crisis. A great majority of people still
wish a
decent and habitable world for their descendants, but those
desires are
thwarted by the machinery that ought to connect the popular
will to
public decisions but no longer does so. We will have to repair
and
perhaps reinvent the institutions of democratic governance
for a global
world, and that means dealing with issues that the founders
of this
republic did not and could not have anticipated.
The process of political engagement at all levels has become
increasingly
Byzantine, confusing, and inaccessible. And in the mass-consumption
society we have all become better consumers than citizens,
which is to
say willing participants in our own undoing. The solution,
however
difficult, is to reconnect people with the political process
and
government at all levels.
Fourth, it is necessary to expose the mythology that surrounds
what
Marjorie Kelly calls "the divine rights of capital"
and place democratic
controls on corporations and the movement of capital.[1]
We once fought a revolutionary war to establish political
democracy in
western societies, but have yet to democratize the workplace
and the
ownership of capital. These are still governed by the same
illogic of
unquestioned divine right by which monarchies once ruled.
The assumption
that corporations are legal persons and thereby beyond effective
public
scrutiny, control, or law is foolishness and worse. The latest
corporate
scandals are only that, the latest in a recurring pattern
of illegality,
self dealing, and political corruption surpassing even that
of the
robber baron era. The solution is to enforce corporate charters
as
public license to do business on behalf of the public that
are revocable
if and when the terms of the charter are violated.
If private ownership is a good thing, it should be widely
extended, not
restricted to the superwealthy. By the same logic, we must
remove the
corrupting influence of money from politics, beginning with
corporate
campaign contributions and the hundreds of billions of dollars
of public
subsidies for cars, highways, fossil fuels, and nuclear power
that
corrupt the democratic process and public policy.
Fifth, political reform requires an active, engaged, and
sometimes
enraged citizenry. An example is the Illinois farmer-citizens
who stood
for hours to hear Lincoln and Douglas debate issues of slavery
and
sectionalism in 1858. Those debates were full of careful argument,
eloquence, and wit. Those citizens applauded, laughed, and
jeered, which
is to say that they followed the flow of argument and heard
what was
being said. Later, some died for and because of those same
arguments.
They were citizens and were willing to sacrifice a great deal
for that
privilege. In our time, while the issues have grown to global
scale with
consequences that extend as far into the future as the mind
dares to
imagine, political argument is whittled down to sound bites
fitted in
between advertisements. The means whereby citizens are informed
have
been increasingly monopolized and manipulated. Only half or
fewer of
citizens bother to vote. Some believe public apathy and political
incompetence to be good or at least tolerable. I do not. Unless
we
reverse course, apathy and incompetence will prove to be the
undoing of
democratic government and all that depends on a healthy democracy.
The
nature of what will replace it is already evident: an unconstrained
and
well-armed managerial plutocracy intent on global plunder.
Sixth, we need a positive strategy that fires the public
imagination.
The public, I believe, knows what we are against but not what
we are
for. And there are many things that should be stopped, but
what should
be started? The answer to that question lies in a more coherent
agenda
formed around what is being called ecological design as it
applies to
land use, buildings, energy systems, transportation, materials,
water,
agriculture, forestry, and urban planning. For three decades
and longer
we have been developing the ideas, science, and technological
wherewithal to build a sustainable society. The public knows
of these
things only in fragments, but not as a coherent and practical
agenda --
indeed the only practical course available. That is the fault
of those
in the field of conservation, and we should start now to put
a positive
agenda before the public that includes the human and economic
advantages
of better technology, integrated planning, coherent purposes,
and foresight.
Finally, we should expect far more of our leaders than we
presently do.
Never has the need for genuine leadership been greater, and
seldom has
it been less evident. We cannot be ruled by ignorant, malicious,
greedy,
incompetent, and shortsighted people and expect things to
turn out well.
If we are to navigate the challenges of the decades ahead,
what E. O.
Wilson calls "the bottleneck," we will need leaders
of great stature,
clarity of mind, spiritual depth, courage, and vision.
We need leaders who see patterns that connect us across the
divisions of
culture, religion, geography, and time. We need leadership
that draws us
together to resolve conflicts, move quickly from fossil fuels
to solar
power, reverse global environmental deterioration, and empower
us to
provide shelter, food, medical care, decent livelihood, and
education
for everyone. We need leadership that is capable of energizing
genuine
commitment to old and venerable traditions as well as new
visions for a
global civilization that preserves and honors local cultures,
economies,
and knowledge.
Imagine a world in which those who purport to lead us must
first make a
pilgrimage to ground zero at Hiroshima and publicly pledge
"never
again." Imagine a world in which those who purport to
lead us must go to
Auschwitz and the Killing Fields and pledge publicly "never
again."
Imagine a world in which leaders must go to Bhopal and say
to the
victims "We are truly sorry. This will never happen again,
anywhere."
Imagine, too, those pilgrim leaders going to hundreds of places
where love,
kindness, forgiveness, sacrifice, compassion, wisdom, ecological
ingenuity, and foresight have been evident.
Imagine a world in which those who purport to lead us must
help identify
places around the world degraded by human actions and help
initiate
their restoration. Some areas might take as long as 1000 years
to
restore, such as the Aral Sea, the Harrapan region in India,
the forests
of Lebanon, soil fertility in the Middle East, Chesapeake
Bay, and the
North Atlantic cod fishery. Imagine a world in which those
who intend to
lead help lift our sights above the daily crisis to the far
horizon of what could be.
Imagine, too, leaders with the kind of humility demonstrated
by Czech
President, Vaclav Havel[2]: "In time I have become a
good deal less sure
of myself, a good deal more humble... every day I suffer more
and more
from stage fright; every day I am more afraid that I won't
be up to the
job... more and more often, I am afraid that I will fall woefully
short
of expectations, that I will somehow reveal my own lack of
qualifications for the job, that despite my good faith I will
make even
greater mistakes, that I will cease to be trustworthy and
therefore lose
the right to do what I do."
Self-described realists will dismiss the idea of better leadership
as
muddle-headed. Some will see in it some global conspiracy
or another.
Prospective leaders will profess sympathy but say they do
not have the
time to improve themselves further. And those least qualified
to lead
will pay no attention at all. But it is not up to any of them
to
prescribe for us. We are now citizens of the earth joined
in a common
enterprise with many variations. We have every right to insist
that
those who purport to lead us be worthy of the task.
Imagine such a time! Imagine a time, not far off, when we
might all be
on board a train heading north!
============
* Reprinted from Conservation Biology Volume 17, No. 2, April
2003, pgs.
348-351. The title comes from Peter Montague, Rachel's Environment
and
Health News #570 (October 30, 1997) available at www.rachel.org.
** David W. Orr is chairperson of the Environmental Studies
Program at Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, U.S.A.; E-mail:
david.orr@oberlin.edu
[1] Kelly, M. 2001. The divine right of capital. Barrett-Koehler,
San Francisco.
[2] Havel, V. 2002. A farewell to politics. The New York
Review of Books
24 October, pg. 4.
Greenpeace:
Rainbow Warrior is free!
Victory - Rainbow Warrior is free
Today the Rainbow Warrior was released by Spanish Government
after 20
days confined to port. A huge thanks to the overwhelming support
for all
of you who sent an amazing 33,000 letters to the Spanish Government
in
one week asking for the ship's release. Even rock stars and
politicians
offered their help. The result: a resounding victory!
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=291002
While we are very happy that the ship is released but here
are some
sobering facts:
In the 20 days the Warrior has been under arrest in Valencia:
Estimated tons of wood imported into the Valencia region:
40,600
Estimated value of wood from illegal sources imported into
Spain:
14,410,960 Euros
So we will be getting back to fighting forest destruction.
Visit:
http://forests.greenpeace.org/
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/campaigns/intro?campaign%5fid=3938
To find out how you can help.
Thank you again for your support!
An
Independence Day Declaration of the People of the United States
of
America (excerpt)
We, therefore, the People of the United States of America,
appealing to
the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions,
do,
by our own authority as the Governed, solemnly publish and
declare that
the Government of these United States be returned to its rightful
place
under the jurisdiction of the Governed; that the Government
return to
its appropriate place as protector of the People and the Environment
against the special interests of the Corporations with renewed
fiscal
responsibility for future generations; that the Government
return our
country to its position as protector of liberty and freedom
both
domestically and abroad, not through aggression, but through
diplomacy,
renewed alliances and leadership; that the Government return
to the
Constitutional principles that are the foundation of over
two centuries
of successful self-government of these United States of America.
And for
the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the
protection
of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our
Lives, our
Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor.
Sign it and pass it on!
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/07/04_declaration.html
Blair's
Iraq Dossier
http://www.computerbytesman.com/
http://www.computerbytesman.com/privacy/blair.htm
http://www.computerbytesman.com/privacy/blair.doc
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm
|