• first one “To heat 1 degree a “Plastic Ball” model ”
• the second “ providing misleading information “, to be used as an incorrect basis for safety and discussion drafts.
  

1. “FALLACY”: ARTIFICIAL “PLASTIC BALL”.

Health fraud: To heat 1 degree a “Plastic Ball” model.

This health fallacy was reported in Luxembourg to the European Commission and WHO in the meeting dealing with the Precautionary Principle (24 February 2003):

Dr. Robert Becker. New York. Twice Dr. Becker has been nominated for a Nobel Prize in Medicine. Published by Linda Moulton Howe in EARTHFILES London (May 2000).

· “This increase in temperature has been studied by physicists and engineers using artificial spherical models”.

“They based their findings on the "spherical cow concept". The initial heating undergone by a cow's body as a result of microwave radiation WHICH WAS USED to establish a "safe level": the power of radiation is "10 times smaller"!.

"That level was applied for several decades to everything that concerned electromagnetic pollution. Of course, this is not correct."

Dr. Robert Becker also states: "So, the premise that was applied by the physicists and the engineers was erroneous from the start."

• Dimension plastic ball......................... ?
• Composition....................................... ?
• RADIATION EXPOSURE...................... ?
• OFFICIAL “NORM”............................. ?

THE MOBILE TELEPHONY WITHOUT ANY HEALTH BASIS?.

2. “INFORMATIVE FALLACIES ”: JUST TRIAL BALLOONS.

Informative fraud: Trial ball or trial balloon presented now as discussion draft by Dr. Repacholi to justify a world health experiment that is carried out with “thousand millions mobile phone users”, and each brain is used as guinea pig to test the effects of microwave radiation.

Dr. Neil Cherry. (May 2000) “A cell phone against the head exposes the premier organ of the human body to serious interference with its processes and serious damage to its tissues and cells”. (Remember Dr. Neil Cherry died 24 May 2003)

3. THE SETTING UP OF A GREAT IMAGE OF SOLEMNITY IN LUXEMBOURG.

WITH THE SOLE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE INTOLERABLE AND FALSE ASSUMPTIONS RE SAFETY MARGINS WHICH WERE SUPPOSED TO OFFER HEALTH PROTECTION. CAN WE CONCLUDE THEN THAT THE BASIC AIM WAS

JUST TO HIDE THE HEALTH FRAUD WITH “ MISLEADING IDEAS”?.

· CONCLUSION: THOUSANDS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AFFECTED BY THIS DANGEROUS SITUATION WANT TO KNOW

WILL THE JUDGES DENOUNCE THIS “HEALTH FRAUD”?

IS IT POSSIBLE TO HIDE WITH JUST “TWO FALLACIES ” THE SERIOUS BRAIN HAZARD THAT PEOPLE ALL AROUND THE WORLD ARE BEING SUBJECTED TO?

EACH MOBILE PHONE IS A MICROWAVE WEAPON.

.....................From EMF-L.................

Question: What kind of scientist uses politicians tricks to justify a "scientific" conclusion???

Answer: TWO kinds - A World Health Organization (WHO) "scientist"!!!! - And a Phony, non scientist!!!!

Subject: WHO Flip-Flops on the Precautionary Principle
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:12:13 -0400
From: Microwave News
To: Roy Beavers

WHO Flip-Flops on EMFs,
Precautionary Principle Now Revoked

June 5, 2003 - The World Health Organization has decided not to invoke the precautionary principle for electromagnetic fields (EMFs), Dr. Michael Repacholi has told Microwave News.

Less than three months after the WHO EMF project told participants at its workshop on the precautionary principle that there is "sufficient evidence" to apply the principle to power-frequency EMFs and radiofrequency and microwave radiation, Repacholi, who runs the project, said that the earlier statement was only a trial balloon.

"The draft we submitted to the Luxembourg workshop was purely a discussion draft to provoke comment....It was very successful at that," Repacholi said.

The move took many of those who had attended the February workshop by surprise. We have full coverage --including reactions of those who went to Luxembourg-- in our May/June 2003 issue, which is now at the printer.

You can order a copy today at a special discount price: For details, go to our Web site,
http://www.microwavenews.com

Order your copy today, and you'll also receive our coverage of these stories, and more:

* In the U.K., Dr. David de Pomerai of the University of Nottingham has shown that very weak microwave radiation can change the shape of proteins, prompting them to clump together or form long strands called fibrils. De Pomerai argues that these changes in turn trigger the production of heat shock proteins, previously reported by his and other labs.

* A proposal from the IEEE's International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety to relax the limits for mobile phone radiation has come in for criticism. The May/June issue explains why.

* Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields at work increased the risk prostate cancer among utility workers.

* The U.K. government has announced an $8 million long-term study of the possible health effects of radiation from TETRA digital radios, which police throughout the country will soon be using.

* In our main editorial, we look at the Bioelectromagnetics Society on the eve of its 25th birthday, and ask why it has failed to live up to its promise.

Our front page and editorials (including one on the WHO decision) will be posted on our Web site after our subscribers have received their copies of the May/June issue.

Best,
Louis Slesin, PhD
Editor & Publisher