|
Betreff: Letters |
|
Von: mastsicknessUK |
|
Datum: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:58:06 EDT |
|
|
It is good to be back on the path. Sandi I have written to the
HPA before, as have many others, in the last two or three years. We are responded to with
dismissive replies due to the “lack of scientific evidence” and given platitudes for
our suffering, if we are lucky, but some of us get no reply! This is just not good
enough in the circumstances and I ask that you take my letter most seriously and
respond to it in kind. It does not (and should
not) before anything is done, take “scientific/medical evidence” to prove that there ARE
very real problems within the population of the advent of the pulsed
microwave radiation technology. That there ARE problems at all should be the
trigger for researchers of all relevant sciences to look into the causes
seriously and then seek to resolve these problems. That there are serious
and possibly fatal incidents occurring, which are ignored or denied by those who are
put in office to safeguard the populace is beyond belief and totally inhuman. I have spoken to
hundreds of people in the last three years. Some are suffering and getting worse with each
new alteration to TETRA, further changes to 3G and new and/or additional
technologies. Others are finding that
their human rights are also violated when mobile phone masts, TETRA, Wi-Fi etc are
sited either close to, or on, their children’s schools/homes or within the community.
As I am electro
hypersensitive, having lost my way of life and well-being as it was before I became
sensitised and having been forced to move three times since September 2003, I most
certainly have just cause to question the validity of the following: a) The “scientific
evidence” b) The blatant disregard
for a precautionary approach recommended by the HPA’s Chairman,
Sir William Stewart on behalf of children and for a minority who might be prone to the
biological effects of pulsed microwave radiation. c) ICNIRP
measuring standards d) The lack of
monitoring and investigation of cancer clusters around mobile phone masts and TETRA e) The almost total
denial of the existence of electro hypersensitivity f) The almost total
denial of proof of harm with technologies using pulsed microwave radiation. g) The motivation for
choosing TETRA for the emergency services when it is known to pulse at around 17.6
Hz with harmonics pulsing at around 20.26Hz – both on the Beta Brainwave. NOTE: I do believe that TETRA was a huge mistake
as effects are worse when TETRA is in the equation. I have spoken to hundreds of people
across the over the last 3 years, those who are EHS and others who are not. Always
the ill health/symptoms are worse with TETRA present and the mental and physical
capacities are more affected. Wi-Fi is pretty deadly too. This combination of mixing
technologies is dangerous and both of these technologies are rapidly covering the Questions requiring a response 1. Will the HPA review Wi-Fi and mobile phone masts/TETRA? 2. Will the HPA investigate cancer clusters around mobile phone masts/ TETRA? 3. Will the HPA review the condition of electro hypersensitivity? 4. Will the HPA investigate what happens when these technologies mix together etc? 5. Will the HPA put in place monitoring of our children, cancer clusters
and the EHS? I need to make it very
clear that I am not writing for myself, I am seeking serious and positive
responses to serious issues that are being ignored or covered up. The “anecdotal evidence”
is out there and it is the HPA’s duty to look into these issues and
investigate them quickly, thoroughly, honestly and openly. The many who are now electro hypersensitive know the truth. They see,
feel, hear and read what is happening and realise that these technologies will
eventually (or perhaps are now) harm non-sensitives, too, as they are harming us,
animal/plant life and our environment. The constant denials from the HPA do it no credit with many of us.
Even some non-sensitive people are beginning to see this denial for what it is. I am writing for all
those who are vulnerable, especially our children; those who are unwell/ill
around mobile phone masts and TETRA; for those who are EHS; for
animal/insect/plant life and our environment, which is also being affected; and for who
are unable to, or lack the courage to speak for themselves. Yours sincerely Mrs S L Lawrence Copied to various