* How Cell Phones Affect Brain Cells - To launch an attack on the validity and sufficiency of federal safety - Decision of Irish Human Rights Commission - Chemtrails - Prevented Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - Mauna Kea (19/7/03)

How Cell Phones Affect Brain Cells

Part of a major research programme into the effects of mobile phones on
the brain is set to be implemented by Bristol scientists this summer.

Professor Alan Preece, head of Biophysics Group of the Department of
Medical Physics at the Bristol Oncology Centre, and his colleague Dr
Stuart Butler, director of the Burden Neurological Institute at Frenchay
Hospital, are to conduct the two-year study.

They are currently awaiting highly-specialised equipment to use in the
research, which will involve more than 30 people over a range of ages.

The pair, along with a team of researchers, will look into the electrical
interference on the brain and any neurological patterns and responses
they create.

Professor Preece has been looking into the effects of mobile phones for
years and released a study which conclusively found that mobile-phone
radiation does disturb brain patterns in 1999.

He said: "We are looking forward to starting the research, which has been
in the pipelines for some time now. But the regulations of the equipment
are proving tricky to meet, because there are many parts to this study
and we all must be working from the same level."

The UK-wide study has cost £7.3 million to implement and all the phones
being made by companies have to adhere to the exact same standards,
output and technical ingredient.

Phones will have no logos or identifiable markings on them, but will
carry only a code so that they can be sufficiently recorded by each
group of researchers.

Monitoring used must also be extremely similar or exactly the same so
that no results can be played off against each other.

This will enable the findings to be regarded as a solid body of
information, even though they are being carried out by numerous groups
of scientists.

Prof Preece said: "It is unfortunate that we would like to have all the
answers now as more and more people are taking up using mobiles, but the
tests must be exact and so the preparation will take a long time.

"Even at the end of the results we will still have a long way to go
before we are able to answer certain questions which are commonly raised
by the public."

Source: This Is Bristol, March 19, 2003

Informant: Reinhard Rueckemann

To launch an attack on the validity and sufficiency of federal safety
regulations regarding cell phones.


Dynamic health?: The delay tactic is applied for "several decades" to
everything that concerned electromagnetic pollution.

Dynamic litigation?: The dynamics of health litigation could drastically
change if the wireless industry cannot keep the cases in federal court.


They based their findings on the "spherical cow concept".

The initial heating undergone by a cow's body as a result of microwave
radiation allowed them to establish a "safe level": the power of
radiation is "10 times smaller"!.

Dr. Robert Becker. New York. Twice Dr. Becker has been nominated for a
Nobel Prize in Medicine. Published by Linda Moulton Howe in EARTHFILES
London (May 2000). "That level was applied for several decades to
everything that concerned electromagnetic pollution. Of course, this is
not correct."

Dr. Robert Becker also states: "So, the premise that was applied by the
physicists and the engineers was erroneous from the start."

This increase in temperature has been studied by physicists and
engineers using artificial spherical models.

Message (excerpt) from Dr. Miguel Muntané

See: Supreme Court Preemption decision

Decision of Irish Human Rights Commission

Hi Klaus:

Today I received the expected refusal of legal help with my case from
the IHRC (Irish Human Rights Commission.) But of course my case does go
on. There is no other choice when I have been branded erronously by
Irish doctors as an insane person--and for life! (By the way, according
to media reports, Irish medicos have the distinction of leading the
field in
snap-judging people as psycotic and planking them in institutions! For
instance, a brief article in today's THE IRISH TIMES (page 3) on this
begins with: "The number of people with psychiatric illness being
involuntarily committed to mental hospitals in the Republic is
'embarrassingly high' compared to other countries, the chairman of the
Mental Health Commission said yesterday." Not a good country obviously
for EHS persons to seek medical assistance with that record of commitals
not to mention that there is no NZ style enforceable charter of patients
rights here either to ensure you'll be at lest treated with respect,
etc! And few Irish people seem to have even got around to questioning if
Irish medicos diagnosis of various mental illnesses were erroneous to
begin with. A bit of advise: give the republic of Ireland a very wide
berth when it comes to soliciting medical help because the chances of
you being screwed
up are pretty high!)

Below is my response to Des Hogan, Solicitor and Senior Case worker with
IHRC at ihrc@eircom.net. I have cc'd it to Professor Brice Dickson and
Ms. Stevens, Case Worker of NIHRC (Northern Ireland Human Rights

Best, Imelda, Cork, Ireland


Dear Mr. Hogan:

I am responding to your letter dated 16 July, 2003, which arrived today.
Before commenting on its contents I am going to transcribe your
complete letter below for the convenience of Ms. Stevens and Professor Brice
Dickson of the NIHRC. (You will recall that some weeks ago we agreed
that my correspondence with you need not be confidential.) As you have
been informed, Ms. Stevens, on behalf of NIHRC, U.K., has reviewed
particulars of my case and while regretting that the remit of NIHRC does
not extend to helping victims of Human Rights violations within the
Republic of Ireland, she has greatly helped me by placing a watching
brief on my case which rests with you.

Your letter is as follows:


16 July 2003

Dr Imelda O'Connor
29 Castle Hill
Co. Cork

Re: Your application to the Commission under section 10 of the Human
Rights Commission Act, 2000.

Dear Dr O'Connor,

I am writing to you further to your previous correspondence with the
Commission concerning your application for legal assistance and
representation under section 10 of the Human Rights Commission Act,

The Commission's Casework Committee, set up to consider requests and
applications made to the Commission pursuant to section 9(1)(b) and
section 10 of the Act respectively, considered your application
at an emergency meeting wich took place on 14 July 2003. At your
request, Commissioner Robert Daly did not attend this meeting.

I regret to inform you that after careful consideration of your
application, the Casework Committee decided not to grant legal
assistance or representation as requested by you on the following grounds:

1. no human right appears to have been violated insofar as the condition
cited ("electromagnetic sensitivity" or "electromagnetic
hypersensitivity") is not at present recognised nationally or
internationally in medical or legal terms, so as to bring it within the
relevant national or international human rights standards and;
2. the legal proceedings in respect of which assistance has been sought
will not be successful, in the Committee's view and
3. the assistance sought cannot be granted due to budgetary constraints.

You can request, if you so wish, that the Commission review the decision
of the Casework Committee not to grant you legal assistance or
representation. If you wish to request a review of the decision, your
request should be in writing and should arrive at the Commission's
office within 28 days of today's date, unless you can show extenuating
circumstances for being unable to make the request in writing or within
28 days of today's date.

Any request that the Commission review the decision of the Casework
Committee should be accompanied by documentation which either in your
view demonstrates that new information has come to light which you could
not reasonably have been expected to provide prior to the Casework
Committee's decision or which demonstrates a clearly identifiable
mistqake of fact or law on the part of the Casework Committee.

Yours sincerely

Des Hogan
Senior Caseworker


My Response:

First, with due respect to the presumably high level of intelligence of
your review committee, I doubt that in one emergency sitting last Monday
they could digest and judiciously consider all the pertinent and complex
issues related to my case that represented thousands of hours of work
for me over recent years and are contained in the numerous files and
other data submitted to you. Consequently I believe that I have not
received the DUE PROCESS of my case that is my fundamental right as an
Irish citizen whose Human Rights have been most seriously and
permanently abused.

Second, my petition for legal assistance to IHRC to help me redress
violations of my Human Rights caused by my named defendants in my
medical negligence case has been refused on a basis that is but
related to why I have launched this medical negligence case. I am
referring to item 1 in your letter of refusal. In my letter of July 4 to
you, transcribed below, I address specific Human Rights violations I
have suffered due to how I was treated by my defendants. I purposely did
not focus on my electrosensitivity but on the horrendously substandard
and unjust treatment meted out by my defendants. The Commission's
Casework Committee IGNORES these. Why? Were they given a copy of my
letter of July 4 where I enumerate these specific Human Rights
violations? Were they given a copy of my follow up emailed letter to you
of July 15 on the same issue?

There is much more that I wish to write but as I want you to have this
before closing time today, I will stop here for now.

I can assure you Mr. Hogan, my case will keep going forward despite all
obstacles placed in my way within this Repuplic of Ireland which I
happen to be a citizen of at present. If my constitution is impotent to
defend my most basic, inviolable right to be considered a person of
sound mind and not a psychotic, then I will have to set about finding a
more principled social contract in another state to which I would be
proud to belong to.

As this state has decided so far that it is ok that I have been
erronously judged to be a person of unsound mind and must reconcile
myself to remaining in that wretched category for the rest of my life--a
category that I have pointed out repeatedly is treated with the ultimate
social and professional opprobrium--I feel the same contempt for this
state--and especially for its designated authorities who are supposed to
uphold this contract between citizens and the state--as it has so far
extended to me!

I look forward to hearing from you and to your replies to the questions
I have posed for you above.


Imelda O'Connor, Ph.D.

Omega see also http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega234.htm


Mr. Des Hogan, Senior Case Worker
Irish Human Rights Commission
17-19 lower Hatch Street, Dublin 2.

July 15, 2003

Dear Mr. Hogan:

Last Thursday afternoon, when I spoke with you by telephone about
progress by the IHRC commissioners in reviewing my case, you let me
know that Dr. Robert Daly has decided, owing to the conflict of
interests issue, not to participate in this review. You also suggested
that I make contact with you today to be updated on any outcome from the
commissioners meeting about my case which was scheduled to take place

And that is my primary purpose in sending you this email. While I'm
doing this, I'd like to bring to your notice (apologies if you are
already aware of it) a very pertinent "pamphlet"/slim text entitled
"Consent: Bridging the Gap between Doctor and Patient" (2002) by Mary
Donnelly, UCC Law Dep. faculty, that I have just read. (It was mentioned
in a profile article on Stephen McMahon, Irish Patients Association
director,that appeared in yesterday's THE IRISH TIMES.)

A number of issues raised by Ms Donnelly are also central to my serious
legal grievance. She notes that "there has been almost no judicial
discussion of the role of the [Irish] Constitution in protecting
individual rights in the context of the personal right to consent" (p.
37) and that "The protection offered by the Constitution in this [art.
40.3.1.) context therefore as yet remains more theoretical than real."
(p. 38).

While Ireland does not have specific legislation which could have helped
avert the appalling abuse of my rights as a patient that I experienced,
New Zealand has such legislation since the mid 1990's (pp. 72-73).

The rights of patients in New Zealand are clearly spelt out in its "Code
of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights" of 1996, and this
code has the legislative force of N.Z.'s 1994 "Health and Disability
Commissioner Act."

Ms. Donnelly notes: "A brief look at how this code [N.Z.] operates may
indicate how the complaints procedure promised by the [Irish] Health
Strategy could develop if the necessary political will is present. The
code, which refers to 'consumers' of healthcare services rather than
patients, sets out ten rights accorded to consumers. Among these rights
are the right to respect; the right to effective communication; the
right to be fully informed; and the right to make an informed choice and
to give informed consent. The existence of these rights imposes
corresponding duties on healthcare and disability service providers.
They must take reasonable actions in the circumstances to give effect
to the consumers' rights. . .."

This N.Z. charter of course would also protect the interests of EHS
patients very well indeed: with such protective legislation for patients
the chances of patients presenting with EHS symptoms being snap judged
as psychotic and over-hastily shooed into psychiatric facilities would
end--the law would insist it would end.

Perhaps the commissioners might like to refer to "Consent: Bridging the
Gap between Doctor and Patient" while studying my case.

Also, the juxtaposed colour photos of me which help point up my adverse
reactions to the anti-psychotic medication are now posted at "Citizens
Initiative Omega" (via Google)

Omega see: http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega238.htm

Look forward to hearing from you.


Imelda O'Connor

Chemtrails Are Real!

From: http://www.world-action.co.uk/chemtrails.html

Will Thomas has confirmed that Dennis Kucinich was asked about
Chemtrails and he stated that THEY ARE REAL!!

WT: This is going to be big - very, very big. Imagine one of the most
respected politicians in America, a man constantly in the news. Not only
that, but a man who served as the head of the House Armed Services
Committee looking after so-called exotic weaponry, top-secret projects,
including HAARP and chemtrails. Of course I'm referring to Democratic
presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich from Ohio, who introduced House
Resolution 2977 back in the fall of 2001. Your listeners are familiar
with this bill that sought to outline weapons in space -- a very good
idea -- and other exotic weapons, including, in one subsection, chemtrails.

Last week in Santa Cruz, California at a public meeting Mr. Kucinich was
asked "What about chemtrails?" And he replied with three blockbuster
words. His reply was: "Chemtrails are real."

'CHEMTRAILS': http://www.world-action.co.uk/chemtrails.html

Are you a force for nature?

Prevented Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

Your tens of thousands of messages helped convince the U.S. Senate to
oppose a back door attempt to open the Arctic Refuge to oil and gas
development. Some members of Congress had tried to include revenues from
leasing the refuge in the 2004 budget bill as a way to move the United
States closer to driling in the refuge. With your continued support,
we're confident that Congress will heed the public and make sure
drilling in the refuge isn't introduced in any other way.

WWF Conservation Action Network
Act Now to Safe Live on Earth


Update on Citizen Efforts to Protect Mauna Kea

On June 26, 2003, organizations and community members appeared before
the Board of Land and Natural Resources to present oral arguments on
"exceptions" to the Hearing Officers ruling in the Mauna Kea Contested
Case Hearing.

This was in response to a permit application by the UH Institute for
Astronomy (on behalf of NASA) to construct six new KECK Outrigger
Telescopes in the Conservation District of Mauna Kea.

Challenging the application in a Contested Case Hearing are Mauna Kea
'Anaina Hou, The Royal Order of Kamehameha I, Hawai'i Island Sierra Club
Moku Loa Chapter, Clarence Ching and Henry Fergerstrom. The citizens'
proposed "Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Law" present a competent and
comprehensive case against unbridled development on the summit.

KAHEA honors the valiant efforts of the mountain's defenders. They are
speaking truth to power to protect the rights of Native Hawaiians to
worship freely on Mauna Kea and to safeguard the fragile summit ecosystem.

After hearing both sides present their arguments, the Board of Land and
Natural Resources voted to take the case under advisement and will be
issuing a ruling within the next few weeks. The BLNR can overturn
(deny), remand for further deliberations, accept or modify the Hearing
Officer's proposed Findings, Decision and Order.

We will share the outcome of the hearing before the Land Board as soon
as possible. You can read Contested Case Hearing Officer Michael
Gibson's Findings of Fact /Conclusions of Law Decision and Order:

O.T. themes:

Shadow Intel Network Pushed For War

Real war, virtual weapons

Informant: kevcross4

Pass it around...it's going to be big news.
Daniel P. Welch

Body of UK arms advisor found

London - A body found in central England matches the description of a
missing Ministry of Defence adviser who had become embroiled in a
controversy over the government's intelligence dossiers on Iraqi arms,
police said on Friday. "The body found matches the description of David
Kelly, but the body has not yet been formally identified," a
spokesperson for Thames Valley Police said. Officers had earlier
reported finding a man's body in a wooded area about 8km from Kelly's
home. His family reported him missing late on Thursday when he didn't
return to his home in Southmoor, about 30km southwest of Oxford, from an
afternoon walk. Kelly, 59, has acknowledged speaking to a British
Broadcasting Corp journalist who reported claims that a key aide to
Prime Minister Tony Blair had insisted on including assertions doubted
by intelligence experts in a dossier on Iraqi weapons.



Informant: Sky Watcher

Tenet: White House official wanted information in speech

It's guerilla war, new commander admits

The Quisling effect

Rock bottom in Iraq

Ashcroft's war on librarians

Beating around the Bush

From heroes to targets

Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Please paste in news letter a few times a week for a few months if


Dr. Rebecca Carley is one of the most dedicated, respected, and upright
women I know. She has been a guest lecturer at international conferences
on the subject of the dangers of vaccines. She is deserving of your support.

She is fighting this battle for all of us. In retaliation, NYS
government has come down as hard on her as they can. Anything you may be
able to do to help her will be remembered by many.

Ron Loeber

----- Original Message -----
From: Drcarley1@aol.com
To: List Deleted
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:27 PM
Subject: Dr Carley's medical license suspended by Medical Mafia

Please be advised that as of 7/11/03, my medical license has been
suspended for a year followed by 4 years probation for "practicing
medicine with a mental illness; said mental illness being the "delusion"
that there is a conspiracy against me. I have been ordered to undergo
"psychiatric treatment" for one year. (I will put as much of the 40 page
decision [which is 90% misinformation such as saying my son is in foster
care] as I can on my website by the end of the week). They admit that no
complaints have ever been filed regarding my treatment of patients. I
have also been ordered to release all of the records on my patients, [so
they can hunt the children down and catch them up on their vaccines].

I will now be a wholistic practitioner doing iridology and counseling
patients on detoxification techniques available over the counter.
However, I will not be able to write prescriptions, order diagnostic
tests, and most importantly, I will not be able to write medical
exemptions. I am sure that the exemptions I have written will be deemed
null and void.

20 years ago, when this was done to Dr. Revisci, his PATIENTS brought an
action against the medical board for depriving them of a unique treatment
available no where else. His patients won, and his license was restored.

Although I will be bringing my own artice 78 proceeding in my case, I am
convinced that the fastest and most likely to succeed strategy is for
the patients/supporters/potential patients to bring their own suit.
Jennifer Grinberg (516-798-7642) will be organizing this effort to
restore the license of the only court qualified expert in VIDS in the country.

It is time for people to do more than "feel sorry" for me, it's time for
ACTION! Since the only people I can NOT write exemptions for are my son
& I, I will not be affected.

However, if nothing is done, when they come to your door and with that
Smallpox/SARS or whatever vaccine and your exemption is deemed invalid,
get ready to roll up your sleeve or go to the quarantine camps as per
the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act (already passed in NYS).

I have given all I can; the only thing left for them to take from me is
my mind (with psychiatric drugs). I await the response of those who I
have served.

In Service to the TRUTH, I Remain, Dr. Rebecca


Informant: John Mecca

Citizens' Initiative Omega

If you want our (normally daily) Newsletter in German, sometimes partially in English, please go to

Note: Citizens' Initiative Omega works on non-profit base. Our messages are the result of many hours of daily research, roundup and editing. If you would like to support our activity for people around the world with a donation or an aid fund unique or on regular base, you can do it here https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=Star.Mail%40t-

If you have informations which you would like to share with your friends and colleges around the world and which are from common interest, please send us this informations, we will send them out. Thank you.

Disclaimer:  The informations contained in our EMF-Omega-News are derived from sources, which we believe to be accurate but is not guaranteed.

Citizens' Initiative Omega is not responsible for any errors or omissions and disclaims any liability incurred as a consequence of any of the contents of this resources.