How Cell Phones Affect Brain Cells
Part of a major research programme into the effects of mobile
the brain is set to be implemented by Bristol scientists this
Professor Alan Preece, head of Biophysics Group of the Department
Medical Physics at the Bristol Oncology Centre, and his colleague
Stuart Butler, director of the Burden Neurological Institute
Hospital, are to conduct the two-year study.
They are currently awaiting highly-specialised equipment
to use in the
research, which will involve more than 30 people over a range
The pair, along with a team of researchers, will look into
interference on the brain and any neurological patterns and
Professor Preece has been looking into the effects of mobile
years and released a study which conclusively found that mobile-phone
radiation does disturb brain patterns in 1999.
He said: "We are looking forward to starting the research,
which has been
in the pipelines for some time now. But the regulations of
are proving tricky to meet, because there are many parts to
and we all must be working from the same level."
The UK-wide study has cost £7.3 million to implement
and all the phones
being made by companies have to adhere to the exact same standards,
output and technical ingredient.
Phones will have no logos or identifiable markings on them,
carry only a code so that they can be sufficiently recorded
group of researchers.
Monitoring used must also be extremely similar or exactly
the same so
that no results can be played off against each other.
This will enable the findings to be regarded as a solid body
information, even though they are being carried out by numerous
Prof Preece said: "It is unfortunate that we would like
to have all the
answers now as more and more people are taking up using mobiles,
tests must be exact and so the preparation will take a long
"Even at the end of the results we will still have a
long way to go
before we are able to answer certain questions which are commonly
by the public."
Source: This Is Bristol, March 19, 2003
Informant: Reinhard Rueckemann
launch an attack on the validity and sufficiency of federal
regulations regarding cell phones.
WRONG HEALTH REGULATIONS: BASED ON "ARTIFICIAL SPHERICAL
Dynamic health?: The delay tactic is applied for "several
everything that concerned electromagnetic pollution.
Dynamic litigation?: The dynamics of health litigation could
change if the wireless industry cannot keep the cases in federal
HEALTH WRONG CRITERIA IN FEDERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS:
They based their findings on the "spherical cow concept".
The initial heating undergone by a cow's body as a result
radiation allowed them to establish a "safe level":
the power of
radiation is "10 times smaller"!.
Dr. Robert Becker. New York. Twice Dr. Becker has been nominated
Nobel Prize in Medicine. Published by Linda Moulton Howe in
London (May 2000). "That level was applied for several
everything that concerned electromagnetic pollution. Of course,
Dr. Robert Becker also states: "So, the premise that
was applied by the
physicists and the engineers was erroneous from the start."
This increase in temperature has been studied by physicists
engineers using artificial spherical models.
Message (excerpt) from Dr. Miguel Muntané
See: Supreme Court Preemption decision
of Irish Human Rights Commission
Today I received the expected refusal of legal help with
my case from
the IHRC (Irish Human Rights Commission.) But of course my
case does go
on. There is no other choice when I have been branded erronously
Irish doctors as an insane person--and for life! (By the way,
to media reports, Irish medicos have the distinction of leading
snap-judging people as psycotic and planking them in institutions!
instance, a brief article in today's THE IRISH TIMES (page
3) on this
begins with: "The number of people with psychiatric illness
involuntarily committed to mental hospitals in the Republic
'embarrassingly high' compared to other countries, the chairman
Mental Health Commission said yesterday." Not a good
for EHS persons to seek medical assistance with that record
not to mention that there is no NZ style enforceable charter
rights here either to ensure you'll be at lest treated with
etc! And few Irish people seem to have even got around to
Irish medicos diagnosis of various mental illnesses were erroneous
begin with. A bit of advise: give the republic of Ireland
a very wide
berth when it comes to soliciting medical help because the
you being screwed
up are pretty high!)
Below is my response to Des Hogan, Solicitor and Senior Case
IHRC at firstname.lastname@example.org. I have cc'd it to Professor Brice
Ms. Stevens, Case Worker of NIHRC (Northern Ireland Human
Best, Imelda, Cork, Ireland
Dear Mr. Hogan:
I am responding to your letter dated 16 July, 2003, which
Before commenting on its contents I am going to transcribe
complete letter below for the convenience of Ms. Stevens and
Dickson of the NIHRC. (You will recall that some weeks ago
that my correspondence with you need not be confidential.)
As you have
been informed, Ms. Stevens, on behalf of NIHRC, U.K., has
particulars of my case and while regretting that the remit
of NIHRC does
not extend to helping victims of Human Rights violations within
Republic of Ireland, she has greatly helped me by placing
brief on my case which rests with you.
Your letter is as follows:
16 July 2003
Dr Imelda O'Connor
29 Castle Hill
Re: Your application to the Commission under section 10 of
Rights Commission Act, 2000.
Dear Dr O'Connor,
I am writing to you further to your previous correspondence
Commission concerning your application for legal assistance
representation under section 10 of the Human Rights Commission
The Commission's Casework Committee, set up to consider requests
applications made to the Commission pursuant to section 9(1)(b)
section 10 of the Act respectively, considered your application
at an emergency meeting wich took place on 14 July 2003. At
request, Commissioner Robert Daly did not attend this meeting.
I regret to inform you that after careful consideration of
application, the Casework Committee decided not to grant legal
assistance or representation as requested by you on the following
1. no human right appears to have been violated insofar as
cited ("electromagnetic sensitivity" or "electromagnetic
hypersensitivity") is not at present recognised nationally
internationally in medical or legal terms, so as to bring
it within the
relevant national or international human rights standards
2. the legal proceedings in respect of which assistance has
will not be successful, in the Committee's view and
3. the assistance sought cannot be granted due to budgetary
You can request, if you so wish, that the Commission review
of the Casework Committee not to grant you legal assistance
representation. If you wish to request a review of the decision,
request should be in writing and should arrive at the Commission's
office within 28 days of today's date, unless you can show
circumstances for being unable to make the request in writing
28 days of today's date.
Any request that the Commission review the decision of the
Committee should be accompanied by documentation which either
view demonstrates that new information has come to light which
not reasonably have been expected to provide prior to the
Committee's decision or which demonstrates a clearly identifiable
mistqake of fact or law on the part of the Casework Committee.
First, with due respect to the presumably high level of intelligence
your review committee, I doubt that in one emergency sitting
they could digest and judiciously consider all the pertinent
issues related to my case that represented thousands of hours
for me over recent years and are contained in the numerous
other data submitted to you. Consequently I believe that I
received the DUE PROCESS of my case that is my fundamental
right as an
Irish citizen whose Human Rights have been most seriously
Second, my petition for legal assistance to IHRC to help
violations of my Human Rights caused by my named defendants
medical negligence case has been refused on a basis that is
related to why I have launched this medical negligence case.
referring to item 1 in your letter of refusal. In my letter
of July 4 to
you, transcribed below, I address specific Human Rights violations
have suffered due to how I was treated by my defendants. I
not focus on my electrosensitivity but on the horrendously
and unjust treatment meted out by my defendants. The Commission's
Casework Committee IGNORES these. Why? Were they given a copy
letter of July 4 where I enumerate these specific Human Rights
violations? Were they given a copy of my follow up emailed
letter to you
of July 15 on the same issue?
There is much more that I wish to write but as I want you
to have this
before closing time today, I will stop here for now.
I can assure you Mr. Hogan, my case will keep going forward
obstacles placed in my way within this Repuplic of Ireland
happen to be a citizen of at present. If my constitution is
defend my most basic, inviolable right to be considered a
sound mind and not a psychotic, then I will have to set about
more principled social contract in another state to which
I would be
proud to belong to.
As this state has decided so far that it is ok that I have
erronously judged to be a person of unsound mind and must
myself to remaining in that wretched category for the rest
of my life--a
category that I have pointed out repeatedly is treated with
social and professional opprobrium--I feel the same contempt
state--and especially for its designated authorities who are
uphold this contract between citizens and the state--as it
has so far
extended to me!
I look forward to hearing from you and to your replies to
I have posed for you above.
Imelda O'Connor, Ph.D.
Omega see also http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega234.htm
Mr. Des Hogan, Senior Case Worker
Human Rights Commission
17-19 lower Hatch Street, Dublin 2.
July 15, 2003
Dear Mr. Hogan:
Last Thursday afternoon, when I spoke with you by telephone
progress by the IHRC commissioners in reviewing my case, you
know that Dr. Robert Daly has decided, owing to the conflict
interests issue, not to participate in this review. You also
that I make contact with you today to be updated on any outcome
commissioners meeting about my case which was scheduled to
And that is my primary purpose in sending you this email.
doing this, I'd like to bring to your notice (apologies if
already aware of it) a very pertinent "pamphlet"/slim
"Consent: Bridging the Gap between Doctor and Patient"
(2002) by Mary
Donnelly, UCC Law Dep. faculty, that I have just read. (It
in a profile article on Stephen McMahon, Irish Patients Association
director,that appeared in yesterday's THE IRISH TIMES.)
A number of issues raised by Ms Donnelly are also central
to my serious
legal grievance. She notes that "there has been almost
discussion of the role of the [Irish] Constitution in protecting
individual rights in the context of the personal right to
37) and that "The protection offered by the Constitution
in this [art.
40.3.1.) context therefore as yet remains more theoretical
While Ireland does not have specific legislation which could
avert the appalling abuse of my rights as a patient that I
New Zealand has such legislation since the mid 1990's (pp.
The rights of patients in New Zealand are clearly spelt out
in its "Code
of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights"
of 1996, and this
code has the legislative force of N.Z.'s 1994 "Health
Ms. Donnelly notes: "A brief look at how this code [N.Z.]
indicate how the complaints procedure promised by the [Irish]
Strategy could develop if the necessary political will is
code, which refers to 'consumers' of healthcare services rather
patients, sets out ten rights accorded to consumers. Among
are the right to respect; the right to effective communication;
right to be fully informed; and the right to make an informed
to give informed consent. The existence of these rights imposes
corresponding duties on healthcare and disability service
They must take reasonable actions in the circumstances to
to the consumers' rights. . .."
This N.Z. charter of course would also protect the interests
patients very well indeed: with such protective legislation
the chances of patients presenting with EHS symptoms being
as psychotic and over-hastily shooed into psychiatric facilities
end--the law would insist it would end.
Perhaps the commissioners might like to refer to "Consent:
Gap between Doctor and Patient" while studying my case.
Also, the juxtaposed colour photos of me which help point
up my adverse
reactions to the anti-psychotic medication are now posted
Initiative Omega" (via Google)
Omega see: http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/omega238.htm
Look forward to hearing from you.
Will Thomas has confirmed that Dennis Kucinich was asked
Chemtrails and he stated that THEY ARE REAL!!
WT: This is going to be big - very, very big. Imagine one
of the most
respected politicians in America, a man constantly in the
news. Not only
that, but a man who served as the head of the House Armed
Committee looking after so-called exotic weaponry, top-secret
including HAARP and chemtrails. Of course I'm referring to
presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich from Ohio, who introduced
Resolution 2977 back in the fall of 2001. Your listeners are
with this bill that sought to outline weapons in space --
a very good
idea -- and other exotic weapons, including, in one subsection,
Last week in Santa Cruz, California at a public meeting Mr.
asked "What about chemtrails?" And he replied with
words. His reply was: "Chemtrails are real."
Are you a force for nature?
Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Your tens of thousands of messages helped convince the U.S.
oppose a back door attempt to open the Arctic Refuge to oil
development. Some members of Congress had tried to include
leasing the refuge in the 2004 budget bill as a way to move
States closer to driling in the refuge. With your continued
we're confident that Congress will heed the public and make
drilling in the refuge isn't introduced in any other way.
WWF Conservation Action Network
Act Now to Safe Live on Earth
on Citizen Efforts to Protect Mauna Kea
On June 26, 2003, organizations and community members appeared
the Board of Land and Natural Resources to present oral arguments
"exceptions" to the Hearing Officers ruling in the
Mauna Kea Contested
This was in response to a permit application by the UH Institute
Astronomy (on behalf of NASA) to construct six new KECK Outrigger
Telescopes in the Conservation District of Mauna Kea.
Challenging the application in a Contested Case Hearing are
'Anaina Hou, The Royal Order of Kamehameha I, Hawai'i Island
Moku Loa Chapter, Clarence Ching and Henry Fergerstrom. The
proposed "Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Law" present
a competent and
comprehensive case against unbridled development on the summit.
KAHEA honors the valiant efforts of the mountain's defenders.
speaking truth to power to protect the rights of Native Hawaiians
worship freely on Mauna Kea and to safeguard the fragile summit
After hearing both sides present their arguments, the Board
of Land and
Natural Resources voted to take the case under advisement
and will be
issuing a ruling within the next few weeks. The BLNR can overturn
(deny), remand for further deliberations, accept or modify
Officer's proposed Findings, Decision and Order.
We will share the outcome of the hearing before the Land
Board as soon
as possible. You can read Contested Case Hearing Officer Michael
Gibson's Findings of Fact /Conclusions of Law Decision and
Intel Network Pushed For War
war, virtual weapons
Pass it around...it's going to be big news.
Daniel P. Welch
of UK arms advisor found
London - A body found in central England matches the description
missing Ministry of Defence adviser who had become embroiled
controversy over the government's intelligence dossiers on
police said on Friday. "The body found matches the description
Kelly, but the body has not yet been formally identified,"
spokesperson for Thames Valley Police said. Officers had earlier
reported finding a man's body in a wooded area about 8km from
home. His family reported him missing late on Thursday when
return to his home in Southmoor, about 30km southwest of Oxford,
afternoon walk. Kelly, 59, has acknowledged speaking to a
Broadcasting Corp journalist who reported claims that a key
Prime Minister Tony Blair had insisted on including assertions
by intelligence experts in a dossier on Iraqi weapons.
AND CHARTS OF IRAQI OILFIELDS: CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE
Informant: Sky Watcher
White House official wanted information in speech
guerilla war, new commander admits
bottom in Iraq
war on librarians
around the Bush
heroes to targets
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
paste in news letter a few times a week for a few months if
Dr. Rebecca Carley is one of the most dedicated, respected,
women I know. She has been a guest lecturer at international
on the subject of the dangers of vaccines. She is deserving
of your support.
She is fighting this battle for all of us. In retaliation,
government has come down as hard on her as they can. Anything
you may be
able to do to help her will be remembered by many.
----- Original Message -----
To: List Deleted
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:27 PM
Carley's medical license suspended by Medical Mafia
Please be advised that as of 7/11/03, my medical license has
suspended for a year followed by 4 years probation for "practicing
medicine with a mental illness; said mental illness being
that there is a conspiracy against me. I have been ordered
"psychiatric treatment" for one year. (I will put
as much of the 40 page
decision [which is 90% misinformation such as saying my son
is in foster
care] as I can on my website by the end of the week). They
admit that no
complaints have ever been filed regarding my treatment of
have also been ordered to release all of the records on my
they can hunt the children down and catch them up on their
I will now be a wholistic practitioner doing iridology and
patients on detoxification techniques available over the counter.
However, I will not be able to write prescriptions, order
tests, and most importantly, I will not be able to write medical
exemptions. I am sure that the exemptions I have written will
null and void.
20 years ago, when this was done to Dr. Revisci, his PATIENTS
action against the medical board for depriving them of a unique
available no where else. His patients won, and his license
Although I will be bringing my own artice 78 proceeding in
my case, I am
convinced that the fastest and most likely to succeed strategy
the patients/supporters/potential patients to bring their
Jennifer Grinberg (516-798-7642) will be organizing this effort
restore the license of the only court qualified expert in
VIDS in the country.
It is time for people to do more than "feel sorry"
for me, it's time for
ACTION! Since the only people I can NOT write exemptions for
are my son
& I, I will not be affected.
However, if nothing is done, when they come to your door
and with that
Smallpox/SARS or whatever vaccine and your exemption is deemed
get ready to roll up your sleeve or go to the quarantine camps
the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act (already passed
I have given all I can; the only thing left for them to take
from me is
my mind (with psychiatric drugs). I await the response of
those who I
In Service to the TRUTH, I Remain, Dr. Rebecca
Informant: John Mecca