WI-FI"
KILLERS? DURING MORE THAN 30 YEARS ....WITH THE SAME "HEALTH
LIE"?
28 junio 2003
EUROPEMEDIA
Denmark
Mobile masts safe as houses - report
27/06/2003
Editor: Christina Verdiani
There is no health risk from radiation from mobile transmitters,
according to a recently released review by the Danish Ministry
of
Science, Technology and Innovation.
The review concludes that the strength of radio waves from
the mobile
network in Denmark is below the international limits recommended
by
ICNIRP. The review also concludes that there is no reason
to believe
that there should be a link between sources of radio waves
and the
development of cancer.
The findings of the review are based on a number of analyses
made in
countries such as UK and Sweden, as their mobile networks
are the same
as to the one in Denmark.
Comment
thereto by Dr Miguel Muntané:
"WI-FI" KILLERS?
"HEALTH LIE" AND DEAD MASS "WITH THE "SPHERICAL
COW
CONCEPT".........
"HEALTH LIE" ACCORDING TO A RECENTLY RELEASED REVIEW.........
DURING MORE THAN 30 YEARS...WITH THE SAME "HEALTH LIE"?
1. There is no health risk from radiation from mobile transmitters,
according to a recently released review.........
2. The review concludes that the strength of radio waves
from the mobile
network in Denmark is below the international limits recommended
by
ICNIRP.
3. Their mobile networks are the same as to.........
REMEMBER:
THE SAME "HEALTH LIE": FALSE PROTECTION BASED ON
THE "DEAD MASS".
DEAD MASS BASED ON THE "SPHERICAL COW CONCEPT".
Letter
to the WHO (to Dr. Leeka Kheifeits)
from MARIANNE KIRST, KRIFTEL, Germany
World Health Organization (WHO) 26.06.2003
Dr. Leeka Kheifeits
Head, Radiation Program
Radiation and Environmental Health
20 Avenue Appia
CH-1211 Geneva 27
Dear Dr. Kheifeits,
Not only believing in equal rights but also in the right
of a healthy
life for everyone, I was quite shocked learning that the WHO
has stopped
further epidemical studies regarding cancer and any other
illnesses
caused by electromagnetic radiation i.e. mobile phones and
their
respective transmitting stations (Handys, Mobilfunkmasten).
May I kindly ask you, what caused this sudden change in the
independent
work of your organization? History has proven that money makes
the
world go round, but it seems as though it is only meant when
it comes to
defend the interests of the healthy and wealthy people. Is
the health
of the rest of the world's human beings not worth any further
investment in epidemical studies because economical objectives
have much
higher priorities?
Environmental consciousness has become a rarity. Therefore,
the work of
your organization is not only highly appreciated but a must!
So please
continue your studies on the dangerous electromagnetic radiation
which
causes already so many illnesses worldwide. If people in the
neighborhood of transmitting stations wouldn't tell me about
their
health problems I wouldn't be worried as much as I am. No
one likes to
suffer from anything and especially not if it is caused by
something
mysterious like radiation which is forced on one by other
instances.
Electromagnetic radiation cannot be seen, smelt nor felt,
but it makes
you unvoluntarily ill - and people and especially children
have already
died from it (cancer).
Neither the Governments nor the mobile industry worldwide
and especially
here in Germany are going for any preventive measures nor
for a
reduction of wavelength (EMF-Grenzwerte). As you may know,
scientists
have found out that even the lowest degree of electromagnetic
radiation
wavelength could harm the oranism of lifes.
I hope you will not only consider my worries but also do
the utmost
possible in continuing the independet studies in this regard
with
respect to the health of all human beings on this world, not
to forget
fauna and flora.
Thank you for taking your time.
Sincerely yours,
Marianne Kirst
cc: OMEGA Mobilfunk-Newsletter
FCC
Opens Rule Making on RF Exposure
This is NOT a response to The EMR Network's Petition for
Inquiry, but it
does address some aspects of the FCC's RF human exposure rules.
FCC Press Release:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT
June 26, 2003 Bruce Romano at (202) 418-2470
PROCEDURES REGARDING HUMAN EXPOSURE
TO RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY
The Commission today proposed amending certain sections of
Parts 1 and 2
of the FCC's rules pertaining to compliance with guidelines
for human
exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy.
It specifically requests comment on various topics and issues
related to
evaluating compliance with those guidelines, but did not propose
to
amend the exposure guidelines themselves.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires agencies
of the
Federal Government to evaluate the effects of their actions
on the
quality of the human environment. To meet its NEPA responsibilities,
the
Commission has previously adopted and implemented requirements
for
evaluating environmental impact, including the impact of human
exposure
to RF energy emitted by FCC-regulated transmitters.
The Commission's current rules and procedures were adopted
and
implemented in 1996 and 1997. Since that time, it has become
apparent
that some aspects of these rules and procedures may need to
be revised
or modified, based on our experience and on the evolution
of services
and equipment, and to clarify the responsibilities of Commission
licensees
and grantees, to better ensure compliance with the Commission's
exposure
limits in the most practical, reasonable and efficient manner.
Specifically, the Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposed,
among other
changes, to revise and modify Commission policies and rules
for routine
evaluation of compliance with exposure guidelines and for
categorical
exclusion from evaluation of certain transmitters, facilities,
and
operations. It also proposed rules for routine evaluation
of compliance
for certain unlicensed devices authorized under Section 15.247
of the
FCCs rules (frequency hopping and digital spread spectrum
devices). In
addition, it proposed the codification of procedures for evaluating
compliance for modular transmitters used in RF devices authorized
by the
Commission, such as laptop computers and for evaluating radiofrequency
exposure from multiple transmitters operating in a given RF
device. It
also proposed rule amendments to clarify what is meant by
occupational
exposure and to more clearly define the responsibilities of
FCC
licensees and grantees in complying with guidelines for such
exposures
in workplace environments.
The Commission invites comment on all of these proposals
and issues
related to them.
Action by the Commission, June 12, 2003, by Notice of Proposed
Rule
Making (FCC 03-132). Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy,
Martin,
Copps and Adelstein, with Chairman Powell issuing a statement.
Docket No. 03-137
Office of Engineering Technology Contact: Robert Cleveland
(202)
418-2422.
Statement of Chairman Michael Powell:
http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2003/db0626/FCC-03-132A2.pdf
Test of Notice of Proposed Rule Making ET Docket No. 03-137
- Proposed
Changes in the Commission's Rules Regarding Human Exposure
to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2003/db0626/FCC-03-132A1.pdf
Janet Newton
The EMR Policy Institute, P.O. Box 117, Marshfield VT 05658
Tel: (802) 426-3035 FAX: (802) 426-3030
Web Site: www.emrpolicy.org
Re:
Spanish story
In the case of Vallodid did a Judge not order the shut down
of mobile
phone transmitters??
Also your message about the Austrian High Court, dated the
20th June
last shows a Court not accepting that mobile phone transmitters
are not
injurious to public health.
Colette
O.T.
Some very important themes:
Take
action to defend the Yellowstone BioGem!
Next Monday, the World Heritage Committee will meet in Paris
to consider
a Bush administration request that international protection
for
Yellowstone National Park be downgraded.
I urge you to contact the World Heritage Committee immediately
and call
on it to reject this irresponsible proposal. You can send
an electronic
message right now by going to
http://www.savebiogems.org/yellowstone/takeaction.asp
The World Heritage Committee is charged with conserving hundreds
of
humankind's most extraordinary natural and cultural treasures.
Nineteen
of those wild places -- including Yellowstone -- have been
elevated to
the committee's In Danger list, which helps trigger action
when a World
Heritage site is threatened with destruction or serious degradation.
Yellowstone needs world protection now more than ever, and
the Bush
administration is the main reason why. At the bidding of oil
giants,
cattle barons and other special interests, the administration
is
unleashing a series of devastating attacks on Greater Yellowstone
and
its greatest living symbols.
Administration officials are inviting energy and logging
companies to
despoil pristine wildlife habitats that surround and buffer
the park.
They are preparing to strip wolves and grizzly bears of endangered
species protection, a disastrous decision that would leave
those animals
just outside the park vulnerable to hunting and extermination.
Last winter the administration rounded up more than 200 of
Yellowstone's
wild bison -- better known as American buffalo -- and sent
them off to a
slaughterhouse. Next year, they may kill hundreds more.
And bowing to pressure from the International Snowmobile
Manufacturers
Association, the administration overruled a National Park
Service plan
that would have banned thousands of snowmobiles that roar
through the
park every winter, spewing air pollution and harassing its
wildlife.
With the Bush administration putting corporate interests
ahead of our
greatest national park, this is the worst possible time for
the World
Heritage Committee to consider reducing its protection. Yellowstone
needs more worldwide attention and action, not less.
Next week, NRDC will be on hand in Paris to make our case
against the
Bush administration's proposal. Our case for Yellowstone will
be even
stronger if the World Heritage Committee hears from thousands
of people
like you beforehand.
Please make your voice heard right now by going to
http://www.savebiogems.org/yellowstone/takeaction.asp
and sending your message on behalf of Yellowstone to the World
Heritage
Committee.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
John H. Adams
President
Natural Resources Defense Council
Urgent
action needed: Help Free the Rainbow Warrior
Following a recent non-violent, peaceful protest, against
the
destruction of African forests, the Spanish Government detained
our
flagship. They've offered to let us buy the ship's freedom
with a Euro
300,000 in bond, along with a promise to undertake no more
marine
actions for the environment in Spanish waters. Never!
Help the Rainbow Warrior get back to the business of protecting
forests,
and tell the authorities they can't silence our voices. Please
act now:
http://act.greenpeace.org/ams/e?a=825&s=forest_skin
Be
a voice for a toxic free future
-----------------------------------
The EU is currently considering new rules to control toxic
chemicals.
Make your voice heard for strong laws on toxic chemicals during
the
consultation period. Sign up for a toxic free future here
before July 8th:
http://www.chemicalreaction.org/
Find out more and comment here:
http://act.greenpeace.org/1055339679/index_html
Broad-spectrum
herbicides highly toxic to humans and other species
Glufosinate ammonium and glyphosate are used with the herbicide-tolerant
transgenic crops that currently account for 75% of all transgenic
crops
worldwide. Both are systemic metabolic poisons expected to
have a wide
range of harmful effects, and these have been confirmed.
Glufosinate ammonium is linked to neurological, respiratory,
gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities, and birth
defects in
humans and mammals. It is toxic to butterflies and a number
of
beneficial insects, also to the larvae of clams and oysters,
Daphnia and
some freshwater fish, especially the rainbow trout. It inhibits
beneficial soil bacteria and fungi, especially those that
fix nitrogen.
Glyphosate is the most frequent cause of complaints and poisoning
in the
UK. Disturbances of many body functions have been reported
after
exposures at normal use levels.
Glyphosate exposure nearly doubled the risk of late spontaneous
abortion, and children born to users of glyphosate had elevated
neurobehavioral defects. Glyphosate caused retarded development
of the
foetal skeleton in laboratory rats. Glyphosate inhibits the
synthesis of
steroids, and is genotoxic in mammals, fish and frogs. Field
dose
exposure of earthworms caused at least 50 percent mortality
and
significant intestinal damage among surviving worms. Roundup
caused cell
division dysfunction that may be linked to human cancers.
The known effects of both glufosinate and glyphosate are
sufficiently
serious for all further uses of the herbicides to be halted.
A great deal of glyphosate is sprayed in Delaware for "control"
of
Phragmites (reed grass). The official position is that this
stuff is
harmless, but I want to present the other side.
regards
Alan Muller
Executive Director
Green Delaware
Radioactive
materials in Iraq
We sent a team in to the former nuclear facility in Tuwaitha,
Iraq,
several weeks ago to monitor reports that radioactive materials
are
present in the local community. We expected things to be bad,
but what
we found exceeded some of our worst fears.
We found radioactive sources near schools. We found sources
up to 10,000
times background radiation being used as housing material
-- sources
which in two hours would expose a resident to a year's maximum
dose for
a radiation worker in the UK, and which have been present
for six weeks
in homes with children.
We believe the IAEA should be admitted back into Iraq by
the occupying
forces immediately and without conditions or restriction,
to assess the
levels of radioactive contamination, secure the sources, and
make
recommendations to the United Nations for responses from the
World
Health Organisation and other appropriate international authorities.
This is a catastrophe which would be met with an immediate
evacuation
and decontamination if it happened in the US or the UK. The
response should
be no less urgent becuase it is happening in Iraq. You can
read more
about what we found at
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=285508
Weapons
inspector: «Powell bluffed the UN»
http://www.nettavisen.no/servlets/page?section=1706&item=274184
Informant: BuzzFlash
The
culture of imperialism
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j062703.html
An
American empire built on deception
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/177/oped/An_American_empire_built_on_deception+.shtml
How
to hate almost anybody
http://www.counterpunch.org/tripp06262003.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
|