of Austrian High Court
I think this is highly significant.........guru.........(Thanks
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Decision of Austrian High Court
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:58:11 +0200
From: Leopoldine Gaig
To: Roy Beavers
IGEF Internationale Gesellschaft für Elektrosmog-Forschung
(International company for electrosmog-research)
IGEF-expert won case against mobile communications company
verdict of the High Court of Justice (Federal Court) of Austria.
Mr. Wulf Dietrich Rose, expert in mobile communications,
Austria, internationally known for his research works in this
his court case for the third time against Max Mobil as per
of the High Austrian Court of Justice (Federal Court) (Az
6 Ob 69/01t;
verdict of 26 April 2001).
He proved through his studies and researches that mobile
represents serious health risks to the nearby living population
cancer, brain tumours, genetic problems, and disformity of
In Germany, Austria and Switzerland, Mr. Rose, IGEF has affected
measurements and specific radiation studies and due to his
obtained that already constructed mobile stations in residential
were dismantled or constructions were simply ostponed. Example:
Mobil (a daughter company of German Telekom) could not increase
construction program of their intended network system.
The Austrian company Max Mobil filed a demand to the court
that Mr. Rose is not only charged to pay an indemnity fine
malpractice but also prohibits him to publish his critical
in connection with the harmful dammages on health provoked
radiation emissions. The Court of Second Instance came already
conclusion that Max Mobile failed to contradict the allegations
Mr. Rose that the radiations of mobile antennas are dangerous
noxious to the population.
This positive verdict by the High Court of Austria plus the
successes of cases looked after by Mr. Rose, proved that his
and studies offer a solid legal base to request the transfer
constructed mobile emission stations, or the postponement
of same, out
of residential areas in Germany, Austria, Switzerland or any
country, even if the indicated norms and guidelines are rigorously
respected by the mobile communication companies.
Numerous studies prove that the electromagnetic fields of
communications, reduces the activity of the brain (including
disrupts the sleep, changes the time of reaction, increases
possibility of brain haemorrhage, provokes lack of concentration,
headaches, fatigue, nausea, loss of memory, reduction of sperm
melatonin, change of DNA, increases blood pressure, cellular
perforation, risks of cancer, mainly brain tumour, and influences
good functioning of pace-makers. To continue installing this
which is already well known for its health risks, and against
resistance of already ill people, is not only criminal but
a real "mafia
mentality", comments Mr. Rose.
* * * * *
Very interesting too: The High Court of Austria cited the
the International Court for Human Rights in Strassburg in
case of Dr.
Hertel 1998 and said, national courts have to respect this
the future. That means, thanks Dr. Hertel and his fight we
to say and publish what we are thinking without fear to be
at a glance
Mast Sanity's campaign involved a range of tactics to get
across, some of which are detailed below.
1. Once you have discovered a mast is going to be put up
in your area,
find out how the planning application is to be dealt with.
masts are simply given permission as a matter of course by
2. If this is the case, you will need to get your local councillor
"call the application in" to ensure it appears on
the council's agenda.
3. Get everyone in the area to write letters of objection
council's planning department and to individual members of
committee. Point out concern over potential health risks and
mast may affect property prices and quality of life in the
Everyone should also object to the mobile phone operator.
4. Make lots of noise. Form an action group and make contact
national campaign such as Mast Sanity. Contact your local
television and radio.
5. Organise a public meeting and, if possible, get your local
attend. Print up flyers detailing the application and decorate
with posters protesting against the mast, with eye-catching
6. Get a copy of all the application documents from you local
7. Try to organise a protest on the day before the council
get local media to attend.
8. Do not despair if the decision goes against you - there
options. Don't take no for an answer.
9. One option is to apply for a judicial review of the council's
decision in the High Court. Without legal aid, this can be
expensive, so speak to a solicitor first. But don't waste
too much time;
you will only have a few weeks to challenge the council's
you do decide to go ahead with court action, there is usually
in the local community who will be eligible for legal aid,
so you can
bring the case in their name.
10. Even when a mast has been built all is not necessarily
lost. It is
possible to take the mobile phone operator to County Court
Schedule 2 of the 1984 Telecommunications Act. This is a relatively
inexpensive option and has been successful in the past. You
will need to
prove that your property has been adversely affected by the
third, less tried, method is to appeal to the Secretary of
local government and planning, who has the final say in planning
Informant: Robert Riedlinger
stage is set for our defeat; Berkeley, California
Recently I have been rebutting in writing one of the Industry's
"experts", whom I've also frequently rebutted in
person in debate, with
much success. Debate situations can be great for you, provided
you're prepared with a slam-dunk for anything the industry
ready to take immediate action against the typical procedural
that your officials may be pressured into committing.
I believe the continuance of your hearing puts you in a stronger,
weaker, position, provided that you keep the heat on throughout
summer and win over your academic community to provide their
support (if only behind the scenes) by and during September.
officials may be waiting for you to give them the power they
turn Industry down. That power is out there; you just haven't
grabbed it yet.
Don't be defeatist. Many communities have won at this stage
their best cards consistently, and refraining from playing
Your community to-date has been much too concessionary to
assertions and arguments. Tighten the belt with get cleaner
firmer arguments, and you'll find yourselves in a stronger
Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous
System by Technical Means
"In the past the individual could face risks and pressures
preservation of his own identity. His body could be tortured,
thoughts and desires could be challenged by bribes, by emotions,
public opinion, and his behavior could be influenced by environmental
circumstances, but he allways had the privilige of deciding
fate, of dying for an ideal without changing his mind...New
technology, however, has a refined efficiency. The individual
defenseless against dicrect manipulation of the brain..."(Jose
1969, neurophysiologist at the Yale University)
"Neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing
threat to human rights" (from the article on the annual
of the French National Bioethics Committee in magazine Nature,
391, January 22, 1998)
On January 1999 the European Parliament passed a resolution
where it (in
paragraph 27) calls "for an international convention
global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons
enable any form of manipulation of human beings".
Plenary sessions, srcoll down to Reports by A4...number -
1999 and fill in 005 to A4). It is our conviction that this
ban can not
be implemented without the global pressure of the informed
public on the governmnets. Our major objective is to get across
general public the real threat which those weapons represent
rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments
parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would
the use of those devices to both government and private organizations
well as individuals.
Why the movement must be international?
For the simple reason that no state will abandon its mind
technology, fearing that other states will use it against
itself, for as
long as other states will not abandon it as well. ("Russian
I. Chernishev, writing in the military journal Orienteer in
1997, asserted that "psy" weapons are under development
all over the globe".
Parameters, pp 38 - 46, U.S. Army War College Quarterly -
Timothy L. Thomas: The Mind Has No Firewall Against PSI Warfare
For that matter national organizations for the ban of radiofrequency
weapons enabling the control of human nervous functions should
all over the globe and cooperate their efforts. We can only
you to form one. If you wish to join the international movement
ban of radiofrequency weapons controling human nervous system
e-mail your name, city where you reside and the state to one
e-mail addresses above. The list of those who support the
ban of those
weapons you will find below the references of the following
can add your name to the list using the same procedure (we
publish your street address).
Extradition, Torture and Electronic Mind Control of U.S. Citizen
John Gregory Lambros, a Native of Minnesota
Vulcan, 04.11.2002 17:19
Several earthquakes in the past week raises the question
telegeodynamics - utilising microwaves to activate volcanoes
energy to trigger earthquakes.
Secretary Reveals Earthquake, Volcano Weapons
'Strong' Quake Hits South-Central Italy
Quake Off Indonesia's Sumatra Injures 40
Quakes In North Pakistan Kill 10, Dozens Hurt
Quake Shakes Northern Japan
Earthquakes Over 5.0 In The Last 30 Days
Quake - 7.9 - Rocks Remote Alaska
7.9 Quake Felt All The Way To Louisiana
Erupts In Ecuador
Of Past Major Quakes To Hit The US
Hits Southern Japan - No Damage Reported
This from New Dawn Magazine back issue from 1999.
A Journal of Alternative News & Information
Real total war has become information war, it is being fought
Delgado's "Physical Control of the Mind"
Hidden Functions of HAARP
and human rights abuse
dh, 12.02.2002 23:42
How the secret technology can effect everything from global
patterns to community orientation and aggression to individual
It happened at Greenham - it's happening at Menwith. You thought
mobile and the network might be dangerous? More dangerous
Cordless battery charger that works by emitting many watts
of HF emr.
Every home should have one (or two) no doubt Not!
rgds / rg
Some very important themes:
Says Bush Misled Americans on War
Chief: Bush Stretched Facts on Iraq
forces 'prepare for Iran attack'
CORPORATE DOLLARS OF DESTRUCTION
Informant: Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear
Power in Space
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Did He Know and When Did He Know It?