Who denounces the false experiment and the absence of "Health
the mobile telephony?
Scientific Committee COST 281
Proof That Mobile Phones Do Cause Brain Damage
By Kathy Moran
Daily Express (United Kingdom) / November 10, 1999
Informant: Miguel Muntané
quotations from Reinhard Rueckemann
"I have been collecting and integrating biological and
evidence from all around the world and will show that electromagnetic
radiation is a Ubiquitous Univeral Genotoxic Carcinogen that
massive increases in cancer, cardiac, neurological and reproductive
health effects in San Francisco and around the world.
If we set public health standards on this evidence then we
significantly reduce sickness in families in San Francisco
and lead the world."
Neil Cherry, PhD. March 2002.
Environmental physicist, New Zealand
"Upregulation of heat shock proteins (Hsps) is a normal
to a cellular stress. However, chronic expression of Hsps
is known to
induce or promote oncogenesis, metastasis and/or resistance
We propose that repeated exposure to mobile phone radiation
acts as a
repetitive stress leading to continuous expression of Hsps
cells and tissues, which in turn affects their normal regulation,
cancer results. This hypothesis provides the possibility of
association between mobile phone use and cancer."
French et al. in June 2001
Centre for Immunology, St Vincent's Hospital Darlinghurst,
Australia in: "Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and
Differentiation 2001 Jun;67(4-5):93-7
"I have no doubt in my mind that, at the present time,
polluting element in the earth's environment is the proliferation
Robert O. Becker, M. D., May 2000
(Interview with Linda Moulton Howe)
Orthopedic Surgeon and pioneering researcher in the field
electricity and regeneration. Twice nominated for the Nobel
Author of The Body Electric (William Morrow & Co., 1987)
Currents (Tarcher/Putnam, 1990).
"There is currently insufficient scientific basis for
that wireless communication technologies are safe or that
they pose a
risk to millions of users.... FCC radio frequency radiation
are based on protection from acute injury from thermal effects
exposure and may not be protective against any non-thermal
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, February 2000
"Wherever we go, we will be immersed in a sea of low-level
Ross Adey, M.D.
Eminent scientist with over 20 years of research experience
non-ionizing radiation Professor of biochemistry, University
California at Riverside, California
"I think we have reason to be cautious, and not use
the [mobile] phone
more than necessary. And the younger you are, the more reason
this seriously. I think you should follow the precautionary
Gro Harlem Brundtland (she is electrically hypersensitive)
WHO Director-General, March 9, 2002.
"To one degree or another, all three of the scientists
who worked on the
EMF Program are inclined to believe that electromagnetic fields
can cause some degree of increased risk of childhood leukemia,
brain cancer, Lou Gehrig's disease and miscarriage."
Dr. Raymond Neutra, chief of the Division of Environmental
Occupational Disease Control for California's Department of
Services (DHS), which ran the "The California EMF Program"
"To enable the basic freedom of choosing where to live,
where to work,
etc., is impossible in relation to the electrosensitive persons'
requirements. And, thus, the question of electrosensitivity
question about democracy!"
Professor Olle Johansson, October 2001
Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience,
Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Message from Susan Clarke concerning defeating Sprint and
Dear Radi -
Once again, many of us have successfully defeated Sprint and
The digital wireless Build-out began in the big cities in
1996 (first in
DC and NYC), then spread from East to West, across the US.
We began resisting antenna placement early in 1997 - over
SIX YEARS ago.
So we have considerable experience.
We have always used health science - despite the many uneducated
and fearful activists who tried to stop us. No one can stop
putting relevant, reliable science on the public record. Period.
we claimed the scientific consensus, we won. That is why the
are so insistent on abusing Section 704 and the lone, controversial,
unlawful and unsupported 2nd Circuit decision. They don't
want you to
Best wishes at & prior to your hearing,
measured response letter to Chernobyl nuclear disaster
Hi Klaus: Below is from THE IRISH TIMES, May 13, 2002.
"EFFECTS OF CHERNOBYL DISASTER
Madam, - There is a serious lack of clear information about
of the Chernobyl explosion on the children of Ukraine, Belarus
Russia. This problem has three distinct sources.
The first is the group of nuclear apologists keen to propagate
of energy production which, as is clear to anyone who has
spent time in
Belarus, has done massive damage to the people of the country,
medically and psycho-socially.
Secondly, some aid agencies and certain sections of the media
to exploit child suffering in an effort to increase and maintain
fund-raising efforts. They mistakenly think that a desire
to do good
furnishes them with a licence to adapt the truth to help their
The third source of confusion is the Belarussian Government,
particular President Alexander Lukashenka, who has frustrated
efforts of scientists trying to analyse the exact extent of
I respectfully suggest that anyone interested in finding
out the reality
of the consequences of Chernobyl should talk to one of the
Belarussians--adults or children--living in Ireland. In the
will offer a frank and honest assessment of the current situation.
RORY McDAID, Clybaun Road, Knocknacarra, Galway.
Best, Imelda, Cork, Ireland