|Radio waves As A Weapon Against The Plague
By Alfredo Flowers
11 of February 2003
Although the efficacy to utilize
radio waves to kill the destructive insects in the agricultural
products has been known for 70 years, the technique never has been
applied in a commercial scale. Methylbromide, by several decades, has
been the main processing to kill an extensive variety of the plague,
that require quarantine.
A recent cooperative effort from
four laboratories of investigation of the Agricultural Service of
Investigation (ARS) and two universities has the goal to surpass the
technical impediments to the utilization of the warming-up by the radio
waves to control the plague in a commercial scale in places such as the
orchards, stores of package, and installations of food.
Electromagnetic waves of radio
frequency can cause that the molecules vibrate and that they are
heated, in the same way that the microwave heat food. But it is
difficult to kill the insects without changing the flavor or the
texture of the food that they infest.
Since the year 2000, a group
directed by Juming "Jimmy" Tang of the State University of Washington
(WSU by their acronyms in English) in Pullman, together with four
laboratories of the ARS and the University of California Davis, has
collaborated in a study of four years to determine, if the radio waves
would be a not harmful and economic alternative to the environment
instead of methylbromide and other efficiently the alive insects in the
fruits and the pecan nuts.
In the Central one Subtropical
Kika Of The Agricultural Heron of Investigation in Weslaco, Texas, the
entomologist Guy J. Hallman is investigating the processing of citrus
fruit with the radio frequency to control the Mexican fly of the fruit.
Hallman is developing an apparatus to simulate what is needed to
commercially treat citrus fruits with heat, such as the oranges and the
tangerines, with radio waves.
In contribution with the group
directed by Tang, who is a professor in the biological engineering of
systems in WSU, James D. Hansen, an entomologist in the Laboratory
Yakima of Agricultural Investigation in Wapato, Washington, wait "to
bathe" barrels containing apples and cherries with radio waves to
determine the times of exposition that will kill the larva of the worm
of the apple without affecting the quality of the fruit. Hansen is
collaborating with Stephen R. Drake, a horticulturist (in the
Laboratory of Investigation of the Fruit of Tree in Wenatchee,
Washington, and Smooth G. Nevens, an entomologist in the laboratory in
In the meantime, in the
Agricultural Center of Sciences in the Valley of San Joaquín in
Parlier, California, the entomologist Judy A. Johnson is practicing the
use of this technology to eradicate the larva of the worm of the apple,
the worm of the orange one umbilicada, and the polilla India of the
More information appears in the
magazine "Agricultural Research" of February and in Internet in:
ARS is the main agency of
scientific investigations of the Department of Agriculture of United
Message from Alfonso Balmori
Message from Imelda to the
Hi Klaus: Media heading sometime
soon: Tinfoil stock quotes rise dramatically as worried mastificated
residents stockpile to create tin walls."
Imelda, Cork, Ireland
protects against mobile mast
Mr Brookes decks his walls with
A man thinks mobile phone masts are such a serious health risk that he
has devised his own protection - aluminium foil. Alan Brookes has
wallpapered his bedroom with foil to protect him from what he believes
are harmful emissions from a mast 15 metres from his house in
Kensworth, near Luton, Bedfordshire.
Orange, which owns the mast,
says the installation is low-powered and that there is no conclusive
evidence of health risks, but Mr Brookes claims it has given him mouth
ulcers, nausea, and headaches.
Ingrid Dickinson, the director
of scientific studies at lobby group Mast Sanity said that she has
heard of people taking desperate measures because they believe masts
make them ill. She said: "Very often people who live near masts have
the very same symptoms.
"Are all these people
psychotics? I don't think so." Mr Brookes admitted his method of
protecting himself was unusual and had become a topic of conversation
in his village. But some of his neighbours told BBC Look East they also
believed more studies should be done on the possible effects of the
masts. Mr Brookes said that until something was done he would continue
to use the aluminium foil as a shield. "I'm not really happy about it.
Why should I have to do it?" he said.
Our Croatian zoologist friend,
fellow ES sufferer and campaigner on environmental issues, Ranka
Sekulic (you have posted my correspondance with Ranka, in two parts, on
your C.I.Omega site) has said it is ok for me to let it be known that
she was awarded a Henry Ford European Conservation Award (honorary)for
1996-'97 in Belgium. Her topic: electromagnetic pollution.
She also published a full page
feature article some fifteen years ago in a regional paper [unsure
which country--I.]on possible links between miscarriages and computers.
She has noted that around that time a law was introduced in the U.S.A.
to protect pregnant women from computer radiation. It stated that they
had to be given other types of work within a company during their
Does anyone on the List know
electromagnetic-sensitive persons who would like to testify in a US
federal case about electromagnetic surveillance & sensitivity
therefrom? Those testifying would not have to travel, if they are
unable to do so on account of their sensitivity.
Kindly send any names to Mr.
Jesus Mendoza at:
Message from lachanteuse1
Please find below the 'open
mail' send today to Pr Moulder and the list of works on
effects of EMF on the BBB permeability
In your FAQ* updated on
23-Feb-2003 You find 4 papers on the biological effects of EMF on the
BBB permeability: 2 by Salford et al, 1 by Tsurita et al, 1 by Finnie
About Salford-2003 you said
:<<The authors do not address the fact that other studies using
longer and more intense exposures have found no evidence for such
I invite you to visit the WHO
Database** where you will find a lot of others works...All these
publications and others, listed below, show that effects are real, and
so, you will can also address the fact that other studies have found
evidence for such effects.
Dr Richard GAUTIER
1. Williams et al Brain Res
2. Neubauer et al Bioelectromagnetics (1990) 11:261-268; Radiat Res
3. Salford et al Microsc Res Tech 1994 Apr 15;27(6):535-42
4. Fritze et al Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1997 Nov;94(5):465-70
5. Persson et al Wireless Networks 3 (1997) pages 455-461.
6. Schirmacher et al Bioelectromagnetics (2000) 21: 338-345
7. Tsurita et al Bioelectromagnetics 2000 Jul;21(5):364-71
8. Persson et al BEMS 2001
9. Merritt BEMS 2001
10. Finnie et al Pathology 2002 Aug;34(4):344-7
11. Okhubo et al BEMS 2002
12. Tore, Aubineau et al BEMS 2002
13. Salford et al Env. Health Persp. On line, Janvier 2003
20. Albert et alBrain Res (1981) 230:153-164;Radio Sci (1979)
14:323-327; J Microw Power (1977) 12(1):43-44
21. Sutton Radio Sci (1979) 14:329-334 and Sutton CH, Balzano Q, Garay
O, Carroll FB J Microw Power (1982) 17(4):280-281
22. Ohmoto et al Int J Hyperthermia (1996) 12:321-34
23. Quock et al Bioelectromagnetics (1987) 8:45-55
24. Lange Bioelectromagnetics (1991) 12:335-348
25. Goldman et al Bioelectromagnetics (1984) 5:323-330
26. Moriyama Surg Neurol (1991) 35:177-182
27. Oscar et al Exp Neurol (1982) 75:299-307; Brain Res (1981)
204:220-225; Brain Res (1977) 126:281-293
28. Frey Radio Sci (1979) 14:349-350; J Bioelectr (1984) 3(1/2):281-292
29. Ward et al Bioelectromagnetics (1982) 3:371-383;
Bioelectromagnetics (1985) 6(2):131-143
30. Burchard et al Neurochem Res 1998 Dec;23(12):1527-31
32. Merritt Radiat Environ Biophys (1978) 15:367-377
33. Gruenau Experimental Neurology 1982, 75: 299-307
34. Lin et al Radiation Research (1982) 89:77-87; Bioelectromagnetics
(1986) 7:405-414; Bioelectromagnetics (1994) 5:323-330;
Bioelectromagnetics (1980) 1:313-323
35. Preston et al Brain Res (1979) 174:109-117; J Appl Physiol (1980)
36. Bortkiewicz Med Pr 2001;52(2):101-6
First of all I thank you for
I am quite familiar with that
data base, Naturally, but I wondered why you did not quote all the
existing publications ?
I would not agree that these
papers, as a group, demonstrate that RFR effects on the blood-brain
barrier occur in the absence of heating. It' very interesting, because
I thought the ICNIRP'standard was also the limit of thermal effects
(...) and I note in the different papers some values which give BBBP :
Salford, Persson : 0.002 W/kg (whole body) at 24 microW/cm2
Tore, Aubineau : 0.5 W/kg (brain average)
Neubauer : 2 W/kg (brain)
Schirmacher : 0.3 W/kg (cells)
Frey : 75 and 100 microW/cm2
These scientists say that it is
not thermal effects ! And I think that we can agree, it is not ?
And what you think of the
problem of the sensibility of detection of the albumin in the different
negatives works (as in Finnie's works that you quote) ?
BTW: Have you thought about what
happens to the field in a 12x12x7 cm TEM cell when you stuff a 350 g
rat into it? Not really different from a room 5x5x2m whith a 35 kg man
into it and 5 meters in front a cell phone base station !