*
The real health hazard is on alive people - Denounce the erroneous
base of mobile telephony : SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT and false
unit SAR - SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT is a bag of plastic with
“sugar-salt-water” and is a DEAD MASS - Cadaver calculation
can be SAR erroneous - Beware of Michelin tires ... they talk
- You basically have Web browser 'cookies' in your tires -
Car Can Talk What It Says May Cause Concern - Concerned about
privacy - Someone else can listen in on phone calls - Gain
control over automotive systems - Increased potential for
surveillance - Changing the nature of Americans' relationship
with their cars - With the growing number of monitoring systems
the car is Big Brother - Information systems being added to
cars can be used for tracking - Information is being used
to track movements - Detailed reporting of accidents through
"black boxes" raises privacy concerns - Warning about possible
violations of privacy - Surveillance technologies are easy
to buy and easy to abuse - Use of location tracking is growing
- Parents can monitor their teenagers' driving - The desire
of law enforcement and business to use data overtook early
promises to be used responsibly - The only way to get real
privacy is not to collect the information in first place -
Pressure is on to Make Tires Talk - New World Order Weapons
Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change - World's climate
can be modified as part of a new generation of non-lethal
weapons - Americans and Russians have developed capabilities
to manipulate World's climate - Technology is being perfected
in US under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program
(HAARP) - Part of the Star Wars Strategic Defence Initiative
(SDI) - HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of
potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes
- HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) - Instrument
capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological
systems of entire regions - Weather warfare - Environmental
modification techniques (ENMOD) - Impacts of military technologies
on World's climate are not object of discussion or concern
- Ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington's strategic
and defense objectives - Dr. Rosalie Bertell : US military
scientists ... are working on weather systems as potential
weapon - Includes enhancing of storms and diverting of vapor
rivers in Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts
or floods - Zbigniew Brzezinski : Technology will make available
to the leaders of major nations techniques for conducting
secret warfare - Marc Filterman outlines several types of
"unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies - Weather
war - Technologies make it "possible to trigger atmospheric
disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar
waves - US aerospace forces own the weather by capitalizing
on emerging technologies and focusing development of those
technologies to war-fighting applications - Weather-modification
offers war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat
or coerce an adversary - In the United States, Weather-modification
will likely become a part of national security policy with
both domestic and international applications (10/01/04)
SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT and false unit SAR. e: SPHERICAL- COW-CONCEPT
and
how to wake-up the judicial myopia?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Bill Curry:
Thank you very much to review the information about SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT.
We must consider the real health hazard is on “alive people”
to denounce
the erroneous base of the mobile telephony: SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT
and
false unit SAR.
* It is imperative that the judges review the health basis of
the mobile
telephony.
The SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT makes reference to a cynical test
to warm up
one degree a DEAD MASS:
1. SPHERICAL-COW-CONCEPT is a bag of plastic with “sugar-salt-water”
and is a DEAD MASS.
2. The “New Models” are very complicated but also based
on a DEAD MASS.
3. The use of supercomputers is correct to impress mass media
and
specially to the judicial myopia. But is only to warm up a DEAD
MASS.
* To confuse the users and judges?.
Thanks for your information and specially the indication of
the
conductivity in alive beings that is 15% different form the
cadaver:
cadaver calculation can be SAR erroneous.
Best regards
Miguel Muntané
From: Bill Curry (excerpt)
Dear Dr. Muntane:
While the "spherical cow" may have been a model previously used
to make
dosimetric assessments, to my knowledge it isn't used now.
The most
realistic dosimetric models use a very complicated rendition
of the
tissues of a human being - e.g., Prof. Om Gandhi's elaborate
models. The
new models that are used in super computer calculations of energy
deposition use the finite difference time domain technique.
Data are
taken from MIR studies of human cadavers and animals. No spherical
symmetry arguments are invoked, no averaging of tissue properties
over
the whole individual or organs of that individual.
Now, many different tissue types, different densities, different
dilectric constants, different electrical conductivities, and
different
internal shapes for structures are included in these elaborate
calculations. The most important deficiency in these models
is their
lack of any way to represent how life changes the interaction
of
electromagnetic waves with tissues. We have only a glimpse of
the
complexity of the problem in the recent series of papers that
showed the
basic electrical constants of tissues change in the transition
from life
to death, and this is the most superficial aspect of how life
modifies
the interaction between tissues and EMR. Don't get too hung
up about the
inadequacies of the spherical cow model - it just isn't used,
as far as
I know!
Bill P. Curry, Ph.D.
--------
PLANETNEWS broadcast...
Beware of Michelin tires ... they talk
----------------------------------------------------
Date: 1 Jan 2004
" Tires, too, can tell on drivers. This year, Michelin began
implanting
match-head-sized chips in tires that can be read remotely. The
company
started using the chips to provide manufacturing information
that could
help spot failure trends and to comply with a federal law requiring
close tracking of tires for recalls. But privacy activists fear
that the
chips, which can be loaded with a car's vehicle identification
number,
would allow yet another form of automated vehicle tracking.
"You
basically have Web browser 'cookies' in your tires," said Richard
M.
Smith, an independent privacy researcher."
Source:
The New York Times
A HREF= "http://www.nytimes.com/"
This Car Can Talk. What It Says May Cause Concern.
<A HREF=http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/29/technology/29car.html?th
By JOHN SCHWARTZ
Published: December 29, 2003
Last year, Curt Dunnam bought a Chevrolet Blazer with one of
the most
popular new features in high-end cars: the OnStar personal security
system.
The heavily advertised communications and tracking feature is
used
nationwide by more than two million drivers, who simply push
a button to
connect, via a built-in cellphone, to a member of the OnStar
staff. A
Global Positioning System, or G.P.S., helps the employee give
verbal
directions to the driver or locate the car after an accident.
The
company can even send a signal to unlock car doors for
locked-out
owners, or blink the car's lights and honk the horn to help
people find
their cars in an endless plain of parking spaces.
A big selling point for the system is its use in thwarting car
thieves.
Once an owner reports to the police that a car has been stolen,
the
company, which was started by General Motors, can track it to
help
intercept the thieves, a service it performs about 400 times
each month.
But for Mr. Dunnam, the more he learned about his car's security
features, the less secure he felt. A research support specialist
at
Cornell University, he is concerned about privacy. He
has enough
technical knowledge to worry that someone else - say, law enforcement
officers, or even hackers - could listen in on his phone calls,
or gain
control over his automotive systems without his knowledge or
consent.
Any gadget that can track a carjacker, he reasons, can just
as readily
be used to track him.
"While I don't believe G.M. intentionally designed this system
to
facilitate Orwellian activities, they sure have made it easy,"
he said.
OnStar is one of a growing number of automated eyes and ears
that
enhance driving safety and convenience but that also increase
the
potential for surveillance. Privacy advocates say that the rise
of the
automotive technologies, including electronic toll areas,
location-tracking devices, "black box" data recorders like those
found
on airplanes and even tiny radio ID tags in tires, are changing
the
nature of Americans' relationship with their cars.
Beth Givens, founder of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, said
the car
had long been a symbol of Kerouac-flavored freedom, and a haven.
"You
can talk to yourself in your car, you can scream at yourself
in your
car, you can go there to be alone, you can ponder the heavens,
you can
think deep thoughts all alone, you can sing," she said. With
the growing
number of monitoring systems, she said, "Now, the car is Big
Brother."
James E. Hall, a transportation lawyer and former chairman of
the
National Transportation Safety Board, said the monitoring systems
presented a subtle blend of benefit and risk. "We are moving
toward a
kind of automobile that nobody's ever known," he said. "It's
mostly good
news, but there are negative things that we will have
to work through."
Mr. Dunnam said he had become even more concerned because of
a federal
appeals court case involving a criminal investigation in Nevada,
in
which federal authorities had demanded that a company attach
a wiretap
to tracking services like those installed in his car. The suit
did not
reveal which company was involved. A three-judge panel in San
Francisco
rejected the request, but not on privacy grounds; the panel
said the
wiretap would interfere with the operation of the safety
services.
CAR SIGNALS
OnStar has said that its equipment was not involved in that
case. An
OnStar spokeswoman, Geri Lama, suggested that Mr. Dunnam's worries
were
overblown. The signals that the company sends to unlock car
doors or
track location-based information can be triggered only with
a secure
exchange of specific identifying data, which ought to
deter all but the
most determined hackers, she said.
As for law enforcement, the company said it released location
data about
customers only under a court order. "We have no choice but to
be
responsive to court orders," Ms. Lama said.
Other information systems being added to cars can be used for
tracking
as well. Electronic toll systems are convenient for computers,
but the
information is increasingly being used to track movements. When
police
were trying to track the car of Jonathan P. Luna, an assistant
United
States attorney who was killed earlier this month, they pulled
the
records of his charges on his E-Zpass account, which led them
to
Pennsylvania, where his body was found. Such records have also
been used
in civil cases like child custody disputes.
Of all of the new automotive technologies, none presents a more
complex
set of benefits and risks than the "black box" sensors that
have already
been placed in millions of cars nationwide. The latest models
capture
the last few seconds of data - like vehicle speed, seatbelt
use and
whether the driver applied the brakes - before a collision.
Such detailed reporting of accidents raises privacy concerns,
said
experts at Consumers Union, which has filed comments with the
federal
government warning about possible violations of privacy. Sally
Greenberg, senior product safety counsel at Consumers Union,
said her
group recognized the potential safety benefits of the reporting
but
wanted the government to "proceed with caution."
People's cars have already started turning their owners in.
Scott E.
Knight, a California man, was convicted last year for the killing
of a
Merced, Calif., resident in a March 2001 hit-and-run accident;
police
tracked him down because the OnStar system in his Chevy Tahoe
alerted
OnStar when the airbag was set off.
Transportation experts say that if these sensor systems can
provide
crucial information for emergency aid workers and for vehicle
research,
lives will be saved. The federal government is considering rules
that
would standardize the information that black boxes provide,
along with
ways to gather the information.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards
Association is working to develop a worldwide standard for black
boxes.
Tom Kowalick, who is co-chairman of the effort, calls the program
"quite
simply a matter of life and death for millions of motor vehicle
crash
victims."
Mr. Hall, the former federal official, is the other co-chairman
of the
effort, and he agreed that the technology should be used to
detect
dangerous car models. The privacy concerns can be minimized,
he said, by
applying the technology to commercial vehicles and fleets. "There
are
enough vehicles out there," he said, "to amass evidence, to
provide you
with the type of information you need without having to even
address the
subject of the privately owned vehicles right now."
Surveillance technologies are easy to buy and even easier to
abuse,
privacy experts say. Paul A. Seidler was arrested last year
in Kenosha,
Wis., after he installed a tracking device in an ex-girlfriend's
car.
According to the police report, the ex-girlfriend, Connie Adams,
complained that "she could not understand how the defendant
always knew
where she was in her vehicle at all times."
Police inspected her 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier and found a small
black box
near the radiator that beamed the car's position to Mr. Seidler's
computer. In June, Mr. Seidler was sentenced to nine months
in jail for
stalking Ms. Adams.
The use of location tracking is growing. Law enforcement agents
have
used similar devices to chart suspects' travels, and a California
company now offers a similar device so that parents can monitor
their
teenagers' driving.
Last year a small rental car company in New Haven, Acme Rent-a-Car,
angered customers by using global positioning to fine them $150
for
speeding. The state's department of consumer protection declared
the
fines illegal - but not the tracking. The company appealed the
consumer
agency's action, but in July a state judge rejected the appeal.
Ian Ayres of Yale University, a law professor who has examined
the
issue, predicted that regardless of what happened with Acme,
"within a
decade all our car insurance companies will be offering us discounts
if
we will commit to Acme-like contracts - if we agree not to speed."
and
the use of tracking technology will grow "even if they
don't give us a
discount," he said, because "all the parents will want these
boxes in
their cars to know whether their kids are speeding."
In fact, one of the largest insurance companies in the United
States,
Progressive Auto Insurance, has already tested policies in Texas
that
tied insurance rates to car usage as monitored by global positioning.
Tires, too, can tell on drivers. This year, Michelin began implanting
match-head-sized chips in tires that can be read remotely. The
company
started using the chips to provide manufacturing information
that could
help spot failure trends and to comply with a federal law requiring
close tracking of tires for recalls. But privacy activists fear
that the
chips, which can be loaded with a car's vehicle identification
number,
would allow yet another form of automated vehicle tracking.
"You
basically have Web browser 'cookies' in your tires," said Richard
M.
Smith, an independent privacy researcher.
Aviel D. Rubin, the technical director of the Information Security
Institute at Johns Hopkins University, said that every new technology
with the potential to invade privacy was introduced with pledges
that it
would be used responsibly.
But over time, he said, the desire of law enforcement and business
to
use the data overtook the early promises. "The only way to get
real
privacy," he said, "is not to collect the information in the
first place."
Related article...
The Pressure is on to Make Tires Talk
http://w4.siemens.de/FuI/en/archiv/zeitschrift/heft2_99/artikel07/
Informant: Don Maisch
--------
Washington's New World Order Weapons
Have the Ability to Trigger Climate
Change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of
Ottawa
Third World Resurgence, January 2001
Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca,
4
January 2002
The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides
but a
partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating
impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the
World's
climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated
"non-lethal weapons." Both the Americans and the Russians have
developed
capabilities to manipulate the World's climate.
In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency
Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star
Wars")
Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence
suggests
that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially
triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From
a military
standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially,
it
constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively
destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire
regions.
While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been
used,
surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of
"environmental warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic
impacts of
greenhouse gases...
Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate
climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly
part
of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations
nor
the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference
on
Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue
of
"weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques
(ENMOD)" as
relevant to an understanding of climate change.
The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and
American
business lobbies has centered on Washington's outright refusal
to abide
by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the
1997 Kyoto
protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World's
climate
are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined
to
greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves
Washington's strategic and defense objectives.
"WEATHER WARFARE"
World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US
military
scientists ... are working on weather systems as a potential
weapon. The
methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of
vapor
rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts
or
floods." (2) Already in the 1970s, former National Security
advisor
Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book "Between Two Ages"
that:
"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations,
techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare
minimum
of the security forces need be appraised... [T]echniques of
weather
modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods
of drought
or storm."
Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several
types
of "unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. He refers
to
"weather war," indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union
had already
"mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes
(hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s."(3) These technologies
make it
"possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely
Low
Frequency (ELF) radar [waves]." (4)
A simulation study of future defense "scenarios" commissioned
for the US
Air Force calls for:
"US aerospace forces to 'own the weather' by capitalizing on
emerging
technologies and focusing development of those technologies
to
war-fighting applications... From enhancing friendly operations
or
disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural
weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications
and
counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter
a
wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary...
In
the United States, weather-modification will likely become a
part of
national security policy with both domestic and international
applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending
on its
interests, at various levels.(5)
Read further under: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html
Informant: George Paxinos
--------
O.T. themes:
Think tank: US "systematically misrepresented" Iraq threat
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/09/1073437447020.html
Conservatism is dead
http://www.libertyforall.net/2004/jan9/conservatism.html
Homeland insecurity
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/01/09/security/
Appetite for destruction
http://www.amconmag.com/1_19_04/article.html
Everything you've always wanted to know about neocons
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j010904.html
Words in defense of Liberty
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=1412
Practicing dissent
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0402/hentoff.php
Giving up the search for mythical WMD
http://www.etherzone.com/2004/pyne010904.shtml
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp |