Note: The size of the type may be changed
by clicking on view at the top of your browser and selecting "text
size". The document will print in the size you select.
|
“The Confederacy has finally won,” declared Dr. Michael
Dawson, Harvard Professor of Government and African American Studies.
“Forget about Red vs. Blue. The states that voted for President
Bush were the territories and states which allowed slavery (with one or
two small exceptions at the border – Iowa and Maryland).” Indiana and
Ohio are also “free state” anomalies that don’t match the pre-Civil War map – but the Green and Libertarian
parties are set for a recount that just might turn Ohio from Red to
Blue, no thanks whatsoever to the Democratic standard-dropper, John
Kerry.
The Greens, who don’t stand to win anything except the
respect and admiration of all decent people, raised nearly $150,000 in
only four days to challenge George Bush’s unofficial 136,000 vote
margin in each of Ohio’s poll precincts. Kerry had the same option and
plenty of cash on hand ($15 million in unspent campaign funds), but
took the Skull and Bones path, fearing a contested outcome might damage
the legitimacy of a system that he values just as dearly as his
erstwhile opponent, George Bush – Black voters be damned. There is no
law against making a concession speech and getting a recount,
but oligarchs like Kerry treasure stability above all else – it keeps
them on top.
Dr. Dawson’s Confederate analogy is also applicable to
the Kerry campaign and the Democratic National Committee, captives of
the Dixie-born and bred Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). Founded in
the mid-Eighties for the sole purpose of retaining white southern
voters by weakening the influence of African Americans and labor, the
DLC has failed miserably in its home region while tightening its death
grip on the national party. Loathing constituencies – especially the
Black base – the DLC cares not a whit for the morale of the African
American citizens who bore the brunt of Republicans’ Election Day
abuse, or for the tens of thousands of volunteers who worked so hard to
overload Bush’s theft machinery with votes. Untold thousands had their
rights amputated on November 2, yet Kerry doesn’t even care to locate
the missing limbs.
God Save The Greens!
"I don't expect to win Ohio," said Green Party
presidential candidate David Cobb, stating the obvious. "But the Green
Party has been standing up for democracy and the right for all voters
to cast their votes." In addition to the $113,600 filing fee, the
Greens and Libertarians must quickly train and field a small army to
unravel what happened in Ohio's 11,306 precincts. They will confront
the infinitely devious Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, who should
by now rival Clarence Thomas as the Black man most hated by African
Americans. Blackwell is employing every trick in the book – and off the
books – to shrink the 150,000-plus pool of provisional ballots that he
never intended to count, judging by his dismissive comments on election
night. The Greens and Libertarians have demanded that Blackwell “recuse
himself from the recount process."
Less than 10 percent of Ohio’s provisional ballots were
thrown out in 2000. However, according to the Associated
Press, Blackwell’s minions are rejecting 19 percent this time
around, and about a third of the provisional ballots cast in Cuyahoga
County, where heavily Black Cleveland is located. A majority of
all provisional ballots, “came from the
15 counties Kerry won,” the Free Press reported.
Over 90,000 ballots were thrown out on November 2 for
“over-vote” or “under-vote” problems. "This suggests another hanging
chad problem," said Cobb, the Green. "To simply discard 92,000 votes
when only 136,000 votes separate the winner from the loser is
problematic at best."
At the Daily Kos, one of the best nitty-gritty politics
sites on the web, a visiting trial lawyer on Sunday calculated the odds that Kerry could overcome Bush:
“Let's say only 70% of the provisionals count – a bit
higher than the 2/3 being reported in Cleveland – but let's go with it.
70% of 155,000 is 108,500. Let's assume 90% are for Kerry [he claims
Gore got 90 percent of provisional votes in 2000].That would mean
97,650 votes for Kerry and 10,850 votes for Bush, a lead for Kerry of
86,800. Subtracting that from Bush's current lead of 132,000 yields a
Bush lead of 45,200.
”Now we move on to the undervotes. If 90% is too high
for the number to be counted (unlike provos, there is a standard and a
history to go with it), let's use 80% instead, to be conservative (no
pun intended). 80% of 93,000 is 74,400. Use the same percentage (80%)
for Kerry (again, no reason to change here – the ballots are what they
are). 59,520 votes for Kerry, 14,880 for Bush, a net of 44,640. So now
the lead for Bush is 560 votes – gee, isn't that really close to 537?
[Bush’s 2000 Florida margin.] And remember, we haven't even touched the
other aspects of a recount (some overvotes may count, not as many as
we'd like, and who knows what may be under those voting machine rocks
when they get turned over in the recount). We are still in the game!”
His figures do not include absentee and military
ballots.
The “game” is more than just about winning; it is about
resistance to state criminality and racial oppression. Journalist Greg
Palast warns that Secretary of State Blackwell “will ultimately decide
which spoiled and provisional ballots get tallied.” But at least there
will be a wrestling match – a spectacle that is owed to the Democratic
voters of Ohio and the nation. It is an awesome indictment of Kerry and
the DNC that two minor parties are doing the Democrat’s – and
democracy’s – work. As is Ralph Nader, whose recount in New Hampshire
may lead him to do the same in Florida.
The criminals’ footprints
John Kerry narrowly won New Hampshire, matching or
bettering Al Gore’s 2000 performance in 229 out of 300 voting wards.
However, a Michigan software programmer named Ida Briggs noticed that,
in 71 wards, George Bush “did better in 2004 than he did in 2000.” Wired News reports:
When Briggs broke the 71 wards down
by voting equipment – separating wards into those that used traditional
paper ballots and those that used optical-scan machines – she
discovered that 73 percent of the wards used optical-scan equipment,
while only 27 percent used traditional paper ballots. Even more
interesting was the breakdown per brand of voting equipment. New
Hampshire wards used optical-scan equipment made by Diebold Election
Systems and Election Systems & Software. About 62 percent of the
wards with anomalous results used Diebold machines.
“Thank God New Hampshire has a paper trail so we can
just sit down and count the paper ballots," said Briggs. Ralph Nader
only had to plunk down a $2,000 deposit to initiate a recount in 11
selected wards to determine if there is a problem with the machines.
Much of Florida uses Diebold Election Systems and Election Systems
& Software equipment, but Nader will have to sue that state to get
a recount. He’s waiting on the results from New Hampshire to decide if
there is “a compelling reason” to put Florida’s machines to the test.
BlackBoxVoting
activist Bev Harris and a team of researchers and video camerapersons
are already in Florida, bagging evidence of fraud in Volusia County,
where Harris documented electronic irregularities in 2000. Despite
hostility and some stonewalling from the rednecks-in-charge, Harris salvaged what may be proof of federal crimes,
cavalierly committed.
”We began to compare the special printouts given to us
with the signed polling tapes from election night. Lo and behold, some
were missing. We also found some that didn't match. In fact, in one
location, precinct 215, an African-American precinct, the votes were
off by hundreds, in favor of George W. Bush and other Republicans….
”So, we compared these with the Nov. 2 signed ones and
the "special' ones from Nov. 15 given to us, unsigned, and we found
several of the MISSING poll tapes. There they were: In the garbage.
”So, Kathleen went to the car and got the polling place tapes we had
pulled from the warehouse garbage. My my my. There were not only
discrepancies, but a polling place tape that was signed by six
officials.
”This was a bit disturbing, since the employees there told us that bag
was destined for the shredder.
Investigations like Harris’s, combined with statistical
analyses and various legal actions, may not in the end send the Bush II
administration to the shredder – but they are critical to undermining
the regime’s legitimacy and to serve those who have been
disenfranchised by the Bush men. Moreover, as with the Watergate
investigation of 1972-1974 (see November 11, 2004 “Rule by Theft: Reconstructing
the Crime”), political crimes should be treated as criminal
conspiracies, not mere “power games.” If a tenth of the fraud that is
suspected turns out to be true, hundreds of Republican operatives (and
voting machine company executives and employees) should be headed
toward prison by the end of Bush II, ratting each other out all the
way. There is immense value in putting the “fear of God” (and
prison) into Republican and corporate ranks.
Statistical investigation is key: Just as street gang
territories are marked by graffiti, patterns of vote tampering can be
discerned by statistical analysis. As we wrote last week: “There may
soon be compelling circumstantial evidence of how the crimes were
committed and, by deduction, the identity of the conspirators.”
International assistance
|
More- http://www.blackcommentator.com/114/114_cover_election_pf.html
|