HEALTH AND SYMPTOMS OF CHEMTRAILS
Do you really want to know what is going on? It
isn't pretty, and it
is far worse than the
imagined evils that have been attributed to so
The truth of the matter is
that the Earth is dieing.
Since the Start of the
Industrial Revolution, about 200 years ago,
mankind has been dumping
pollutants into the air in greater and
greater amounts. Though many
developed industrial nations have become
aware of what was happening
and that the atmosphere could only hold
so much, I fear that the
emerging industrial nations are behind the
times when it comes to
All of these pollutants have
been adding up over time, by the mid
20th century when we started
fully understanding the implications of
what we were doing by the
symptoms and signs given even then, it was
too late to do much to advert
Even if we had cut back our
emissions to near nil, we still would
have suffered through the UV
Summer caused by the depleted Ozone
layer. All of those CFCs and
other Ozone destroying gasses were still
in the lower atmosphere, it
takes a few years for them to reach the
Ozone layer thus when we
discovered the holes in the ozone, it was
already to late to stop
The UV Summer started back in
1990-92 - it its growing worse
exponentially, in a few years
UV levels will be high enough to cause
serious ecological disaster
which will have a direct impact on crops.
Presently we would have
nearly 30% more cases of skin cancer if
nothing had been done.
Another side effect of all
the pollutants is the Green House effect a
very real problem that I fear
we under estimated several years ago.
In early 1993 a few events
took place which showed that Global
Warming was speeding up,
meaning that the earlier estimates which had
a 2'F global warming in 50
years was far off the mark, more like 20
We, mankind and the industry
that supports us, made a terrible,
costly mistake. We waited to
too long to change our ways.
In the 1980's a conference
was joined together of many scientists and
military brass. In closed,
Top Secret meetings everything and I mean
everything was placed on the
table. The general information is in the
public domain; however, it is
policy to stress the optimistic outlook
for the Future of Earth.
This took place around the
time the Wall Fell and the Iron Curtain
came down. These events are
directly linked to the secret meetings
that took place. The notion
of political boundaries became moot when
faced with extinction. Yes, a
few nations till hold back, but these
are the ones who refuse to
see very real problems.
Much of the intelligence and
the data that was placed on the table
came out of the old Soviet
Union. They too had seen the problem and
were concerned. As President
Reagan pointed out, it would take an
outside force that threatened
humanity as whole to bring about world
peace. Ironically as he spoke
those worlds the crises was mounting.
The purposes of the
closed-door meetings were to discuss in real
terms what the coming events
for earth were. Further, to offer
working immediate solutions
and to set up reasonable long-term goals.
When the meetings started it
was a fair certainty that something had
to be done it was rather
obvious that something was wrong. It wasn't
until the meetings went on
that the exact magnitude of the disaster
was understood for the very
The combined data showed that this
generation, our generation would see the end of life as we know it. A
true extinction level event that was forecasted to include up to 89% of
all species and poise a very real threat not only to the existence of
our civilization but our species as well. The going odds were less than
10% that mankind would survive.
Two major problems faced us;
Global Warming and UV Summer. Global Warming, as you may know, is far
more than just a rise in earth's average temperature, it also includes
a rising of sea water, not only from the melt of the polar ice, but
from the expansion of
water when heated.
Take a look at any map of the
world and you will quickly note that the major population centers
reside in the coastlands and low lands of the world. If we allow the
seas to rise we would lose all of those homes. Evacuation of a good
chunk of the earths population is not
It would also mean that more
water vapor would enter into the atmosphere charging torms with
more energy causing greater storm damage. Heat the Atlantic a few
degrees and Hurricanes become Hypercans, storms of such size and
strength that nothing in their
path can survive.
Winters would become far
worse, super blizzards that would bury cities and towns, then afterward
would melt into floodwaters. Increased precipitation worldwide would be
seen. Further areas that had once seen abundant rain would suddenly
enter major drought.
Super weather patterns would
kill, the droughts would destroy our ability to feed the 6+ billion
people on earth - combined with coastal and low land flooding our
civilization would not survive.
Venice Italy is a prime
example of the realities of global warming, it is flooding much more
now than 20 years ago. In recent decades we have seen large chunks of
the Antarctic ice pack break off - large as Rhode Island.
Alaska and Greenland are
showing signs of global warming as well. The mean average temperature
of Earth has increased dramatically – more than what is reported. It is
heating up faster with each passing year. The more heat that is
trapped, the more wide spread and dramatic the effects are. Look back
over the past decade of weather patterns. One will easily see the
impact of Global Warming.
UV Summer is here; it has
been here for a while. Without protection we would be seeing more
instances of skin cancer. This problem has been down played as well,
however I am most certain that a resourceful person can find the real
statistics for skin cancer cases and also real statistics on how much
flooding of the coastal regions is taking place and the number and
severity of storms. The evidence is out there. Buried under controlled
skepticism and directed debunking.
With all of this in mind and
with the reality of our future being very dim indeed, it was decided to
do something. Several ideas were considered. A large solar array placed
between the Earth and the Sun, it would do much to cool the earth,
however it would do little to reduce the poisoning by UV Radiation (As
well as other cosmic radiations that are deflected by the Ozone Layer.
A series of smaller
reflective discs placed in Orbit between Sun and Earth was considered,
but the same UV problem would be there.
Detonation of several high
yield nuclear weapons was considered as well, it was thought that the
controlled nuclear winter would reduce the amount of UV and Infrared
reaching the surface, however no one wanted to risk radiation
poisoning, and who in their right mind would willingly detonate nuclear
weapons? The outcry from the public would
The initial Stratospheric
`Shadow' Plan which called for the spraying of reflective dust combined
with other elements that would cause condensation therefore
precipitation was considered, however, this required spraying in the
upper regions of the atmosphere.
Ozone is created by radiation
bombardment (mainly UV) of the Oxygen atom. This is how the Earth has
maintained its Ozone Layer for millions of years. Had we sprayed in
that region of the atmosphere it was feared that the natural production
of Ozone would be hampered, requiring repeated applications over
centuries of time.
We were faced with one viable
option, and that was to lower the altitude where seeding would be done.
Many metals and substances
were considered. The Stratospheric Seeding would have used titanium
oxide and aluminum oxide conjunction with silver iodine and other trace
metals. The idea was to create a long lasting umbrella that would
reflect sunlight back out into space.
At lower levels in the
atmosphere these particles would be inhaled by organisms this
drastically reduce the number of substances that could have been used.
(Note: even at higher altitudes it was feared that the dust would
settle out in time, over generations - the risk of side effects was far
lower than one would imagine)
What is being used is the
only combination that will do the job of adverting ecological disaster
while having the least amount of impact on human and animal life.
It came down to a matter of
numbers. Without treatment we faced an extinction level event. With
treatment we see possible survival with a loss of a few hundred
million, possibly 2 billion if one considers the long-term effects of
near constant exposure to the substances used to create the shield.
It may appear that this is an
open and shut case and that if provided with the choices the human race
would agree to this spraying. The Good of the many far outweighs the
good of a few.
Unfortunately there is a
little bit more to the picture.
There is a standing need to
deal with the problem fast. The greatest threat to the project was that
the arguments and the sideline debates and the weighing of the pros and
cons would drag out until it was far to late for even this extreme
Remember that all of this was
being done During the Clinton Administration. Look back at that period
of time and you will find that there were a few stage shows put on
world wide to entertain and pull attention away from the ecological
problems we faced.
Several events took place,
which were staged as well, all of which were designed to keep the
What is going on has far
reaching implications. The general strife we see today is artially due
to the threat that our species faces. There are those who would rather
see nothing done than to have this project carried out.
If it was revealed just how
bad things really are, I assure you, the ensuing panic would cause
greater damage than the suspicious mumblings that have been heard when
it comes to Chem-Trails.
I tell you these things to
set the record straight and to impress upon you the need to refrain
from causing panic. The threat to humanity is not from the planes
spraying overhead, but from the impact that mankind has had on this
Earth is dieing. The program
in place is only a stop gap measure. The more dire estimates tell us
that the problem is too far advanced to stop ecological disaster. The
oceans are dieing, the fresh water supply is depleted, and the very
ground in which we grow our crops is yielding up poisons.
Global Warming and UV Summer
are the issues that face us today, tomorrow we will be looking at
famine, thirst and the spread of disease.
We have forestalled for a few
decades the death of our civilization. It is not a cure; it is not the
solution. Unless a miracle takes place during the next 20 years,
mankind and planet earth will die.
Look back at the past two
decades of political history to see the truth of these words. Look at
the events as being a result of the threat that humanity faces. When
the Soviet Union folded, it did so to the amazement of many Do you
honestly think that the Soviet Union folded due to financial problems?
Look at the years of relative
peace we have enjoyed, do you think that all of these nations who were
once at each other's throat decided to set aside their differences
The fast development of the
European Union is another sign of the times. A United Europe has never
been possible before, but suddenly it is not only possible, but
Date: Mon Dec 2,
2002 2:42 pm
From A Friend - Answer to Questions
I took the Four
questions asked from a participant here and I also added a few of my
own. I sent off my questions the day before Thanksgiving, Today I got a
Having read your
email, I must say that you are full of questions.
These questions I
would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated attempts of fringe
groups to bring a halt to the project, however these reports of
biological material being part of the spray should be addressed.
Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your questions as
1. What purpose do polymer threads
imbedded with biological material serve in this scenario?
part of the mixture and they do form in threads and in `tufts'. The
idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.
As you may know
spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders spin a `parachute'
to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from their place of birth.
Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes and travel great
distances for long periods of time.
Most of the elements
used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their powdered form
they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them with the polymers
suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above the surface for
longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not need to spray as
often or as much material.
suspended particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the
atmosphere and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an
attempt to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold
growth suppressants - some of which may be of biological material. Mold
comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can attract mold
spores through static charges created by the friction of the polymer
threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and moisture and mold
begins to grow.
The polymer is
stored in a liquid form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they
combine behind the plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much
tinkering has been done which the chemical matrix in past years.
Many polymers (plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem
of pollution. Various formula have been used, some which even use
It would be
great if we could reproduce the same web material that spiders make, it
is extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks down relatively
fast in the ecology.
this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so much of it
take place at night?
Though it would appear
that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast, it is actually takes much
longer to be an effective shield. There is a desired concentration
being sought. One that is thick enough to stem the UV and the Infrared,
while being thin enough to allow visible light through. A perpetual
cloud cover would have disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain
thus disrupted would soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin
cover that would theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty
of sunlight while providing protection. From UV radiation and also
reflect enough infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.
The optimal condition
is to use the least amount of material to provide the maximum amount of
shielding. Ideally that would be a one- time application which would
stay suspended for years, however, as noted, barium and aluminum and
other trace elements are far heavier than air and they sink rather
temperatures between day and night causes massive volumes of air to
rise during the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above
the cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at
night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes
the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a
thin layer. I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely
highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of
I note, it is not just
global warming we are combating here, we are also combating UV Summer.
Global warming could effectively be treated by applications during the
night, when the warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated
during the day. This is why on some days one finds that more spraying
is done during the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for
If the problem
were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been used to suspend
particles in the high atmosphere. However the delicate nature of the
Ozone Layer precludes this method of shielding. More on this in the
answer to Question 6.
What other military programs are in place involving the spraying of
barium and what are their purposes?
Do you know and
understand the chemical make up of the element? A little knowledge will
go a long way to understanding the need to use barium:
Barium is often used
in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes
as a drying and oxygen-removing agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it
reacts vigorously with water to form the hydroxide, liberating
hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to
form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with
water. Barium reacts with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its
water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds are poisonous.
carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison.
Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in
safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to
provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and
water; it is used as a drying agent.
Barium chloride is
used in medicinal preparations and as a water softener.
phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint
pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because
barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be
used to coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray
photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the
Note what Barium Oxide
can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the chief gasses causing the
green house effect.
In my answer to
Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current
in the shield. I would
like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to diffuse and
strengthen an electrical charge.
Somewhat like the
current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar metals,
such as iron and copper.
military applications for everything you can think of, can not a butter
knife be used as a weapon?
The same concept holds
What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails spraying?
Or is there one?
the use of radio waves in the shield, one first understands how ozone
is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation really is.
The shield in place is only a partial solution; we must counter the
depletion of the ozone- this means we must make ozone in the
Ozone at ground
levels does no good; indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what
is used to determine the air quality. Higher levels of ground level
ozone mean that air quality is bad.
Pure ozone is
an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic fresh,
penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per liter at
standard temperature and pressure.
Below its boiling
point (-112°C) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting point
(-193°C) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is triatomic
oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic mass units
(amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen.
formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of solar
ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this layer only
to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is important because
its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other high-energy
radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to the earth's
surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes an ozone
molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic oxygen: 03+
ultraviolet light - 0+02. Later, in the presence of a catalyst,
the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.
Ozone is also
formed when an electric discharge passes through air; for example, it
is formed by lightning and by some electric motors and generators.
Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air between two
concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an alternating high
voltage; this is called the silent electric discharge method.
radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more
stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.
The shield acts like
one plate of the electrode, when tickled with certain radio waves; it
produces an opposite charge to stratospheric layers producing low
atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating Ozone where it is
this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are other
chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?
ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.
relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a real scale. That is
what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal
life sustaining conditions on a dieing planet. We have never done this
before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods.
Granted, if we
do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity stands a
high chance of not surviving through two more generations (or less).
However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and permanent injury) is
not easy to swallow either.
Several attempts to
improve the application of Shielding material and getting the most out
of each application are taking place all the time.
resources of the nations of earth are not enough to allow constant
spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of technology, there is
a great surface area that needs to be covered nearly daily. Large
sections of ocean are all but ignored; the remaining landmasses are
more than what can be covered effectively.
would work best if it was a single thin layer with out interruption,
however due to the movement of air, weather patterns and the sad fact
that we do not have the means to place ample amounts of material at the
same level at the same time we are getting a small fraction of the
effectiveness from our applications.
6. Why is
spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?
Before a storm
there is a front, the front clears the air before a storm, pushing
particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space relatively clear of
particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in these areas, sometimes
to dangerous levels. The shield must be maintained.
absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide, precipitation has been
affected. Other kinds of sprays are in development and testing which
may reduce the affects on precipitation. As I stated above, this is a
new technology we are working with, it is still in its infancy and
there are some problems with it.
7. What about the reports of sickness after
several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive to metals,
whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals - As stated in a
pervious email, people will get sick, and some will die. It is
estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some degree by
the spraying. with out spraying we have a 90% + chance of
becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.
8. What is
the relationship between these spraying programs and One World Order?
Personally I am
against the move for globalization, and yes, there is potential to use
the Shield to speed up the process of globalization, there are several
countries that are involved in this project:
Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors to the project,
many of the allied nations and UN Members participate to one extent or
another. The material (chemical spray as you may call it) comes from
all of these nations. To insure that the chemicals are not tampered
with, they are mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that
chemicals produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over
Russia, England and the USA. This random spray of material means that
no nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a
nation which they have issues with.
may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian
skies - The canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no
idea where its canister is going. Participating nations have their
observers at every station where canister loading is done.
All of this to
insure that the shield is not used as a weapon.
insure that the shield is not used as a weapon, nonparticipant nations
are sprayed by participants who must spray in order to get enough
material to maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not
spraying is as much a military offense as shooting at them. Without the
shield, UV poisoning would cause great death.
The threat is a
common one, which has brought nations together in defense. The natural
outcome of having a common enemy is to strengthen international ties -
a step toward globalization.
9. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?
Yes and no.
Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance groups who feel
that we should not interfere with the natural order of things. As you
know, there are many rumors out there as to what the Shield Program is.
Some believe that this is a population reduction scheme, designed to
kill off `undesirable' peoples. While others hold that this is a mind
control program. There are many theories which have sinister plots in
them these are propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to
stop the shield regardless of the consequences.
delivery method could be used for biological and chemical warfare. It
could also be used to inoculate large populations, the effectiveness of
these uses are low, there are better methods that can be used.
As a means to
fight terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a
population individually and would insure full inoculation against germ
10. Why all
Due to the severity of
the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as
The Earth is
dieing. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield
mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today
could live to see this extinction take place.
This means that an
announcement of the situation we face boils down
to telling every man,
woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be
killed. People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the
production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in
all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers
to rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan
areas would try to leave the cities seeking `safety' in the rural areas
thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the cities would
be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies.
We would be telling
the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield
the chances of survival are small. UV Summer and Global Warming are the
immediate problems we face, there are far greater problems that are
raising their ugly heads and will present new problems which in some
cases have no viable solutions at this time.
collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of
chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in
many places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop
failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are
smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in
genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to
produce enough to go around.
20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure
the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground
water , killed beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects.
These chemicals have gotten into the food chain and are affected other
species besides mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine
spreads like a cancer throughout the world.
Clean fresh water is
in short supply, in many places well water is nonpotable, containing
the run off of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers that have been
used on crops and lawns. The water treatment facilities we have are
unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have placed in the soil and
water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up over time in the
body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its presence felt in
many areas of the world in the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility,
birth defects, learning disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc.
These are on the rise, any good researcher can find the records.
there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step
we made to clean up our production, millions where born who added to
the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a
couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real
numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced.
Name a city
that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to
find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever
before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount
of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before.
All the clean air acts
passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions did not address
the production of more factories and more autos.
Here an uneasy
compromise was made between the need to maintain the economy against
the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost since it was
estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy was a problem
that would have dire effects today.
All of these
factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts boils down to
the end of the world in 50 to 75 years.
Even if we were
to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past decades
is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years.
However we can
not stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting down
every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every household
on the planet.
Electricity is used to
heat many homes in the Western World. The production of electricity
produces fewer pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal.
Cutting our power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and
fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark.
It is an impossible
situation, our civilization is geared to the use of energy, take away
our energy and civilization will collapse.
will spraying stop?
several factors governing this.
Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at repair
reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels, spraying
will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and 2024.
Should another method be found which is more effective, less costly or
presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project would be
the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of the shield
worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to 2050.
Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the Government
backing down on its pollution controls?
are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems than they would
solve ecological problems.
the threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's.
Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging
Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced
now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place.
The world is
heading for economic depression, more emission controls would add to
the economic problems. This translates into our being unable to do
anything to start solving the problems. Unfortunately our technologies
require a strong economy to advance. We need that advancement, we need
the trillions of dollars spent on research that a strong economy
causes. Each corporation that produces a product has a product
development program in place. Many of the past products invented came
by accident through other unrelated products.
There is a corporate
drive to find methods to clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions,
etc. These goals have been in place for decades, any of the large
corporations are on the know when it comes to the ecological problems
we face thus they are spending a great deal of money and time on
finding solutions to the problems we face.
Take away the
economy and their research stops.
13. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How
do you know that this is what is happening?
prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of this. To
validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your behalf. I
would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:
Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of pollutants
produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.
B. Number of
emerging Industrial Nations.
C. Number of
cases of Skin cancers worldwide.
Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple math will
show that more acreage is needed to produce food per individual
production from 1975 to present, estimated number of autos on the road
and the average emissions of later model cars produced as compared the
emissions of earlier model cars - A little math will show that though
individual autos produce less emissions, the amount of emissions has
risen due to the number of autos on the road - Remember that many autos
are the road that were built before present emission control standards.
1980 is a cut of date anything put on the road before then produces
more pollutants than autos produced today. I would include research in
the number of diesel autos produced, diesel has not been under the
emissions control acts.
F. Severity of
storms and the number of severe storms. Also include heat waves and
droughts in that research, you will find that the numbers are
staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.
G. Research how
naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the stratosphere. Compare to
how it is produced industrially.
political reforms in the past 30 years, see which
have changed, which nations have joined with whom. Concentrate more on
these from 1982 onward. This would include the fall of the Wall and
polymers and how they are made, look at recent research done in
biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.
J. Check out
spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their different webs and
clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's to today - world
the following medical conditions per capita: Birth Defects Cancers
Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus borne ID illnesses
such as HIV)
Learning disabilities, including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests
Sterility for both male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma
M. Compare the
history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You may note that it was on
sharp rise until 1997-99.
N. I would
strongly recommend researching the reactions of different barium and
aluminum compounds and how they are used. Research how long it takes
for these metals in pure form to oxidize, how they combine with
nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon ioxide and fluorocarbons and
hydrocarbons and water vapor.
O. Research how
mold propagates, the conditions it needs to grow and just how abundant
it is in the atmosphere.
If you pursue these
lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield Project as it really is.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains
copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. Chemtrailpatrol is making this article available
in our efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, justice
issues, corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights and social
understanding. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.
Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.