Betreff: All about Chemtrails and why they are being made
Von: Dani Djinn
Datum: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:20:56 -0800 (PST)


I knew before I ever went to the link attached for chemtrailpatrol it was bs bs bs bs bs UN bs.

Earth Changes and Global Warming

Don´t waste your time on Earth Changes and Global Warming when your own depopulation has already begun. You may find that you shan´t get to see too many changes. Don´t believe me? Then start educating yourselves. Things are FAR advanced. World depopulation NSA top agenda http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/depopulation.htm
World Population Control — U.S. Strategy and UN Policy Program http://www.fathersforlife.org/health/popcontrol.htm
NSSM200 - Depopulation http://www.africa2000.com/SNDX/nssm200all.html
The Lucis (Lucifer) Trust, New Age, UN http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NewAge/Lucis_Trust.htm
U.S.A. MAP DEPICTING BIODIVERSITY RESERVE AND CORRIDOR PLAN - YES, You will be pushed to the fringes of your own country. http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1695.cfm
The above is all contained in the UN book: Our Global Neighbourhood - The Report of the Commission on Global Governance http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-827997-3
And here is how they do it: This is the UN Man and Biosphere Programme http://www.unesco.org/mab/
Note the use of the ANKH in their logo!
Then see this: UN-HABITAT http://www.unhabitat.org/
Get the great name of this programme - The UN Human Settlements Programme. Get ready to be "settled" or is that "re-settled"
Want to see more:
http://www.restoringamerica.org/archive/un/biosphere_reserves.html

The UN Deception

Just when you thought things couldn't get any more bizarre, sick and twisted you come across something like this. The UN has taken upon themselves to create their own version of the Ark of the Covenant and Ten Commandments. This stuff is real ! I am at a lose for words. You'll have to check it out for yourself.
It is called The Ark of Hope. It was created for the celebration of the Earth Charter Document.
http://www.earthcharter.org/innerpg.cfm?id_menu=19
Click on the link below to view the NWO Ark:
http://www.arkofhope.org/index.php?module=htmlpages&func=display&pid=1



V <zonman@expo-net.org> wrote:
http://www.chemtrailpatrol.com/cp_deep_shield.htm

HEALTH AND SYMPTOMS OF CHEMTRAILS

Do you really want to know what is going on? It isn't pretty, and it
is far worse than the imagined evils that have been attributed to so
called `Chemtrails'.

The truth of the matter is that the Earth is dieing.

Since the Start of the Industrial Revolution, about 200 years ago,
mankind has been dumping pollutants into the air in greater and
greater amounts. Though many developed industrial nations have become
aware of what was happening and that the atmosphere could only hold
so much, I fear that the emerging industrial nations are behind the
times when it comes to reduced emissions.

All of these pollutants have been adding up over time, by the mid
20th century when we started fully understanding the implications of
what we were doing by the symptoms and signs given even then, it was
too late to do much to advert disaster.

Even if we had cut back our emissions to near nil, we still would
have suffered through the UV Summer caused by the depleted Ozone
layer. All of those CFCs and other Ozone destroying gasses were still
in the lower atmosphere, it takes a few years for them to reach the
Ozone layer thus when we discovered the holes in the ozone, it was
already to late to stop further damage.

The UV Summer started back in 1990-92 - it its growing worse
exponentially, in a few years UV levels will be high enough to cause
serious ecological disaster which will have a direct impact on crops.
Presently we would have nearly 30% more cases of skin cancer if
nothing had been done.

Another side effect of all the pollutants is the Green House effect a
very real problem that I fear we under estimated several years ago.
In early 1993 a few events took place which showed that Global
Warming was speeding up, meaning that the earlier estimates which had
a 2'F global warming in 50 years was far off the mark, more like 20
years.

We, mankind and the industry that supports us, made a terrible,
costly mistake. We waited to too long to change our ways.

In the 1980's a conference was joined together of many scientists and
military brass. In closed, Top Secret meetings everything and I mean
everything was placed on the table. The general information is in the
public domain; however, it is policy to stress the optimistic outlook
for the Future of Earth.

This took place around the time the Wall Fell and the Iron Curtain
came down. These events are directly linked to the secret meetings
that took place. The notion of political boundaries became moot when
faced with extinction. Yes, a few nations till hold back, but these
are the ones who refuse to see very real problems.

Much of the intelligence and the data that was placed on the table
came out of the old Soviet Union. They too had seen the problem and
were concerned. As President Reagan pointed out, it would take an
outside force that threatened humanity as whole to bring about world
peace. Ironically as he spoke those worlds the crises was mounting.

The purposes of the closed-door meetings were to discuss in real
terms what the coming events for earth were. Further, to offer
working immediate solutions and to set up reasonable long-term goals.
When the meetings started it was a fair certainty that something had
to be done it was rather obvious that something was wrong. It wasn't
until the meetings went on that the exact magnitude of the disaster
was understood for the very first time.

 

The combined data showed that this generation, our generation would see the end of life as we know it. A true extinction level event that was forecasted to include up to 89% of all species and poise a very real threat not only to the existence of our civilization but our species as well. The going odds were less than 10% that mankind would survive.

Two major problems faced us; Global Warming and UV Summer. Global Warming, as you may know, is far more than just a rise in earth's average temperature, it also includes a rising of sea water, not only from the melt of the polar ice, but from the expansion of
water when heated.

Take a look at any map of the world and you will quickly note that the major population centers reside in the coastlands and low lands of the world. If we allow the seas to rise we would lose all of those homes. Evacuation of a good chunk of the earths population is not
feasible.

It would also mean that more water vapor would enter into the atmosphere charging  torms with more energy causing greater storm damage. Heat the Atlantic a few degrees and Hurricanes become Hypercans, storms of such size and strength that nothing in their
path can survive.

Winters would become far worse, super blizzards that would bury cities and towns, then afterward would melt into floodwaters. Increased precipitation worldwide would be seen. Further areas that had once seen abundant rain would suddenly enter major drought.

Super weather patterns would kill, the droughts would destroy our ability to feed the 6+ billion people on earth - combined with coastal and low land flooding our civilization would not survive.

Venice Italy is a prime example of the realities of global warming, it is flooding much more now than 20 years ago. In recent decades we have seen large chunks of the Antarctic ice pack break off - large as Rhode Island.

Alaska and Greenland are showing signs of global warming as well. The mean average temperature of Earth has increased dramatically - more than what is reported. It is heating up faster with each passing year. The more heat that is trapped, the more wide spread and dramatic the effects are. Look back over the past decade of weather patterns. One will easily see the impact of Global Warming.

UV Summer is here; it has been here for a while. Without protection we would be seeing more instances of skin cancer. This problem has been down played as well, however I am most certain that a resourceful person can find the real statistics for skin cancer cases and also real statistics on how much flooding of the coastal regions is taking place and the number and severity of storms. The evidence is out there. Buried under controlled skepticism and directed debunking.

With all of this in mind and with the reality of our future being very dim indeed, it was decided to do something. Several ideas were considered. A large solar array placed between the Earth and the Sun, it would do much to cool the earth, however it would do little to reduce the poisoning by UV Radiation (As well as other cosmic radiations that are deflected by the Ozone Layer.

A series of smaller reflective discs placed in Orbit between Sun and Earth was considered, but the same UV problem would be there.

Detonation of several high yield nuclear weapons was considered as well, it was thought that the controlled nuclear winter would reduce the amount of UV and Infrared reaching the surface, however no one wanted to risk radiation poisoning, and who in their right mind would willingly detonate nuclear weapons? The outcry from the public would
be intense.

The initial Stratospheric `Shadow' Plan which called for the spraying of reflective dust combined with other elements that would cause condensation therefore precipitation was considered, however, this required spraying in the upper regions of the atmosphere.

Ozone is created by radiation bombardment (mainly UV) of the Oxygen atom. This is how the Earth has maintained its Ozone Layer for millions of years. Had we sprayed in that region of the atmosphere it was feared that the natural production of Ozone would be hampered, requiring repeated applications over centuries of time.

We were faced with one viable option, and that was to lower the altitude where seeding would be done.

Many metals and substances were considered. The Stratospheric Seeding would have used titanium oxide and aluminum oxide conjunction with silver iodine and other trace metals. The idea was to create a long lasting umbrella that would reflect sunlight back out into space.

At lower levels in the atmosphere these particles would be inhaled by organisms this drastically reduce the number of substances that could have been used. (Note: even at higher altitudes it was feared that the dust would settle out in time, over generations - the risk of side effects was far lower than one would imagine)

What is being used is the only combination that will do the job of adverting ecological disaster while having the least amount of impact on human and animal life.

It came down to a matter of numbers. Without treatment we faced an extinction level event. With treatment we see possible survival with a loss of a few hundred million, possibly 2 billion if one considers the long-term effects of near constant exposure to the substances used to create the shield.

It may appear that this is an open and shut case and that if provided with the choices the human race would agree to this spraying. The Good of the many far outweighs the good of a few.

Unfortunately there is a little bit more to the picture.

There is a standing need to deal with the problem fast. The greatest threat to the project was that the arguments and the sideline debates and the weighing of the pros and cons would drag out until it was far to late for even this extreme measure.

Remember that all of this was being done During the Clinton Administration. Look back at that period of time and you will find that there were a few stage shows put on world wide to entertain and pull attention away from the ecological problems we faced.

Several events took place, which were staged as well, all of which were designed to keep the masses busy.

What is going on has far reaching implications. The general strife we see today is artially due to the threat that our species faces. There are those who would rather see nothing done than to have this project carried out.

If it was revealed just how bad things really are, I assure you, the ensuing panic would cause greater damage than the suspicious mumblings that have been heard when it comes to Chem-Trails.

I tell you these things to set the record straight and to impress upon you the need to refrain from causing panic. The threat to humanity is not from the planes spraying overhead, but from the impact that mankind has had on this delicate planet.

Earth is dieing. The program in place is only a stop gap measure. The more dire estimates tell us that the problem is too far advanced to stop ecological disaster. The oceans are dieing, the fresh water supply is depleted, and the very ground in which we grow our crops is yielding up poisons.

Global Warming and UV Summer are the issues that face us today, tomorrow we will be looking at famine, thirst and the spread of disease.

We have forestalled for a few decades the death of our civilization. It is not a cure; it is not the solution. Unless a miracle takes place during the next 20 years, mankind and planet earth will die.

Look back at the past two decades of political history to see the truth of these words. Look at the events as being a result of the threat that humanity faces. When the Soviet Union folded, it did so to the amazement of many Do you honestly think that the Soviet Union folded due to financial problems?

Look at the years of relative peace we have enjoyed, do you think that all of these nations who were once at each other's throat decided to set aside their differences magically?

The fast development of the European Union is another sign of the times. A United Europe has never been possible before, but suddenly it is not only possible, but happening.

A friend

Date:  Mon Dec 2, 2002  2:42 pm

Subject:  More From A Friend - Answer to Questions

I took the Four questions asked from a participant here and I also added a few of my own. I sent off my questions the day before Thanksgiving, Today I got a reply.

Here it is: 

Having read your email, I must say that you are full of questions.

These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project, however these reports of biological material being part of the spray should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your questions as possible


1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological material serve in this scenario?

  Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.

  As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes and travel great distances for long periods of time.


Most of the elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not need to spray as often or as much material.

  Since the suspended particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth suppressants - some of which may be of biological material. Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and moisture and mold begins to grow.

The polymer is stored in a liquid form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has been done which the chemical  matrix in past years. Many polymers (plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of pollution. Various formula have been used,  some which even use biological agents.

  It would be great if we could reproduce the same web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.

   2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so much of it take place at night?  

Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield. There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.

The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one- time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier than air and they sink rather rapidly.

  The different temperatures between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a thin layer. I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of spraying.


I note, it is not just global warming we are combating here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day. This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas.

  If the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.

   3. What other military programs are in place involving the spraying of barium and what are their purposes?

  Do you know and understand the chemical make up of the element? A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need to use barium:  

Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds are poisonous.

  Barium carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is used as a drying agent.  

Barium chloride is used in medicinal preparations and as a water softener.

  Barium sulfide phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the subject.  

Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the chief gasses causing the green house effect.  

In my answer to Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current

in the shield. I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge.

Somewhat like the current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper.

  There are military applications for everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a weapon?  

The same concept holds true here.

   4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails spraying? Or is there one?

  To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution; we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make ozone in the stratosphere.  

Ozone at ground levels does no good; indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air quality is bad.

  Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure.

Below its boiling point (-112°C) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting point (-193°C) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen.

   It is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light -  0+02. Later, in the presence of a catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.

  Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric discharge method.

  Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.


The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating Ozone where it is needed.

   5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?

  Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.

  We are relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life sustaining conditions on a dieing planet. We have never done this before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods.

  Granted, if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations (or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and permanent injury) is not easy to swallow either.  

Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding material and getting the most out of each application are taking place all the time.

  The combined resources of the nations of earth are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored; the remaining landmasses are more than what can be covered effectively.

  The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.

  6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?

  Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must be maintained.

  Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide, precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in development and testing which may reduce the affects on precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems with it.

 



7. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?

  There are several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals - As stated in a pervious email, people will get sick, and some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some degree by the spraying. with out spraying we have a 90% + chance of  becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.

  8. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and One World Order?

  Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes, there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this project:

  European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations. To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia, England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a nation which they have issues with.

  Russian planes may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies - The canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at every station where canister loading is done.

  All of this to insure that the shield is not used as a weapon.

  To further insure that the shield is not used as a weapon, nonparticipant nations are sprayed by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is as much a military offense as shooting at them. Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death.

  The threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.  

9. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?

  Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a population reduction scheme, designed to kill off `undesirable' peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield regardless of the consequences.

  The same delivery method could be used for biological and chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are better methods that can be used.

  As a means to fight terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.

  10. Why all the secrecy?  

Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as possible.

  The Earth is dieing. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could live to see this extinction take place.  

This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down

to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities seeking `safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies.  

We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of survival are small. UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at this time.

  Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to go around.

  Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground water , killed beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the world. 

Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise, any good researcher can find the records.

  For decades there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced.

  Name a city that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before.  

All the clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions did not address the production of more factories and more autos.

  Here an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy was a problem that would have dire effects today.

  All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years.

  Even if we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years.

  However we can not stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every household on the planet.  

Electricity is used to heat many homes in the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark.


It is an impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.

  11. When will spraying stop?

  There are several factors governing this.

  1. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels, spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and 2024.

  2. Should another method be found which is more effective, less costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project would be replaced.

  3. When the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to 2050.

  12. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the Government backing down on its pollution controls?

  Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems than they would solve ecological problems.

  We surpassed the threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's. Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place.

  The world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being unable to do anything to start solving the problems. Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that produces a product has a product development program in place. Many of the past products invented came by accident through other unrelated products.  

There is a corporate drive to find methods to clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been in place for decades, any of the large corporations are on the know when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the problems we face.

  Take away the economy and their research stops.


13. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that this is what is happening?

  I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:

  A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.  

B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.

C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.

D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per individual

E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars - A little math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions, the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the road - Remember that many autos are the road that were built before present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut of date anything put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.  

F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.

G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.  

H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which

political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.

I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.

J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their different webs and threads.

K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's to today - world wide.

L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus borne ID illnesses such as HIV)

Occurrences of Learning disabilities, including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts  

M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.

N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used. Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize, how they combine with nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon ioxide and fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.

O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.  

If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield Project as it really is.

  A friend










FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Chemtrailpatrol is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, justice issues, corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights and social understanding. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
  Links
                  

http://www.chemtrailpatrol.com/cp_deep_shield.htm

HEALTH AND SYMPTOMS OF CHEMTRAILS

Do you really want to know what is going on? It isn't pretty, and it
is far worse than the imagined evils that have been attributed to so
called `Chemtrails'.

The truth of the matter is that the Earth is dieing.

Since the Start of the Industrial Revolution, about 200 years ago,
mankind has been dumping pollutants into the air in greater and
greater amounts. Though many developed industrial nations have become
aware of what was happening and that the atmosphere could only hold
so much, I fear that the emerging industrial nations are behind the
times when it comes to reduced emissions.

All of these pollutants have been adding up over time, by the mid
20th century when we started fully understanding the implications of
what we were doing by the symptoms and signs given even then, it was
too late to do much to advert disaster.

Even if we had cut back our emissions to near nil, we still would
have suffered through the UV Summer caused by the depleted Ozone
layer. All of those CFCs and other Ozone destroying gasses were still
in the lower atmosphere, it takes a few years for them to reach the
Ozone layer thus when we discovered the holes in the ozone, it was
already to late to stop further damage.

The UV Summer started back in 1990-92 - it its growing worse
exponentially, in a few years UV levels will be high enough to cause
serious ecological disaster which will have a direct impact on crops.
Presently we would have nearly 30% more cases of skin cancer if
nothing had been done.

Another side effect of all the pollutants is the Green House effect a
very real problem that I fear we under estimated several years ago.
In early 1993 a few events took place which showed that Global
Warming was speeding up, meaning that the earlier estimates which had
a 2'F global warming in 50 years was far off the mark, more like 20
years.

We, mankind and the industry that supports us, made a terrible,
costly mistake. We waited to too long to change our ways.

In the 1980's a conference was joined together of many scientists and
military brass. In closed, Top Secret meetings everything and I mean
everything was placed on the table. The general information is in the
public domain; however, it is policy to stress the optimistic outlook
for the Future of Earth.

This took place around the time the Wall Fell and the Iron Curtain
came down. These events are directly linked to the secret meetings
that took place. The notion of political boundaries became moot when
faced with extinction. Yes, a few nations till hold back, but these
are the ones who refuse to see very real problems.

Much of the intelligence and the data that was placed on the table
came out of the old Soviet Union. They too had seen the problem and
were concerned. As President Reagan pointed out, it would take an
outside force that threatened humanity as whole to bring about world
peace. Ironically as he spoke those worlds the crises was mounting.

The purposes of the closed-door meetings were to discuss in real
terms what the coming events for earth were. Further, to offer
working immediate solutions and to set up reasonable long-term goals.
When the meetings started it was a fair certainty that something had
to be done it was rather obvious that something was wrong. It wasn't
until the meetings went on that the exact magnitude of the disaster
was understood for the very first time.

 

 The combined data showed that this generation, our generation would see the end of life as we know it. A true extinction level event that was forecasted to include up to 89% of all species and poise a very real threat not only to the existence of our civilization but our species as well. The going odds were less than 10% that mankind would survive.

Two major problems faced us; Global Warming and UV Summer. Global Warming, as you may know, is far more than just a rise in earth's average temperature, it also includes a rising of sea water, not only from the melt of the polar ice, but from the expansion of
water when heated.

Take a look at any map of the world and you will quickly note that the major population centers reside in the coastlands and low lands of the world. If we allow the seas to rise we would lose all of those homes. Evacuation of a good chunk of the earths population is not
feasible.

It would also mean that more water vapor would enter into the atmosphere charging  torms with more energy causing greater storm damage. Heat the Atlantic a few degrees and Hurricanes become Hypercans, storms of such size and strength that nothing in their
path can survive.

Winters would become far worse, super blizzards that would bury cities and towns, then afterward would melt into floodwaters. Increased precipitation worldwide would be seen. Further areas that had once seen abundant rain would suddenly enter major drought.

Super weather patterns would kill, the droughts would destroy our ability to feed the 6+ billion people on earth - combined with coastal and low land flooding our civilization would not survive.

Venice Italy is a prime example of the realities of global warming, it is flooding much more now than 20 years ago. In recent decades we have seen large chunks of the Antarctic ice pack break off - large as Rhode Island.

Alaska and Greenland are showing signs of global warming as well. The mean average temperature of Earth has increased dramatically – more than what is reported. It is heating up faster with each passing year. The more heat that is trapped, the more wide spread and dramatic the effects are. Look back over the past decade of weather patterns. One will easily see the impact of Global Warming.

UV Summer is here; it has been here for a while. Without protection we would be seeing more instances of skin cancer. This problem has been down played as well, however I am most certain that a resourceful person can find the real statistics for skin cancer cases and also real statistics on how much flooding of the coastal regions is taking place and the number and severity of storms. The evidence is out there. Buried under controlled skepticism and directed debunking.

With all of this in mind and with the reality of our future being very dim indeed, it was decided to do something. Several ideas were considered. A large solar array placed between the Earth and the Sun, it would do much to cool the earth, however it would do little to reduce the poisoning by UV Radiation (As well as other cosmic radiations that are deflected by the Ozone Layer.

A series of smaller reflective discs placed in Orbit between Sun and Earth was considered, but the same UV problem would be there.

Detonation of several high yield nuclear weapons was considered as well, it was thought that the controlled nuclear winter would reduce the amount of UV and Infrared reaching the surface, however no one wanted to risk radiation poisoning, and who in their right mind would willingly detonate nuclear weapons? The outcry from the public would
be intense.

The initial Stratospheric `Shadow' Plan which called for the spraying of reflective dust combined with other elements that would cause condensation therefore precipitation was considered, however, this required spraying in the upper regions of the atmosphere.

Ozone is created by radiation bombardment (mainly UV) of the Oxygen atom. This is how the Earth has maintained its Ozone Layer for millions of years. Had we sprayed in that region of the atmosphere it was feared that the natural production of Ozone would be hampered, requiring repeated applications over centuries of time.

We were faced with one viable option, and that was to lower the altitude where seeding would be done.

Many metals and substances were considered. The Stratospheric Seeding would have used titanium oxide and aluminum oxide conjunction with silver iodine and other trace metals. The idea was to create a long lasting umbrella that would reflect sunlight back out into space.

At lower levels in the atmosphere these particles would be inhaled by organisms this drastically reduce the number of substances that could have been used. (Note: even at higher altitudes it was feared that the dust would settle out in time, over generations - the risk of side effects was far lower than one would imagine)

What is being used is the only combination that will do the job of adverting ecological disaster while having the least amount of impact on human and animal life.

It came down to a matter of numbers. Without treatment we faced an extinction level event. With treatment we see possible survival with a loss of a few hundred million, possibly 2 billion if one considers the long-term effects of near constant exposure to the substances used to create the shield.

It may appear that this is an open and shut case and that if provided with the choices the human race would agree to this spraying. The Good of the many far outweighs the good of a few.

Unfortunately there is a little bit more to the picture.

There is a standing need to deal with the problem fast. The greatest threat to the project was that the arguments and the sideline debates and the weighing of the pros and cons would drag out until it was far to late for even this extreme measure.

Remember that all of this was being done During the Clinton Administration. Look back at that period of time and you will find that there were a few stage shows put on world wide to entertain and pull attention away from the ecological problems we faced.

Several events took place, which were staged as well, all of which were designed to keep the masses busy.

What is going on has far reaching implications. The general strife we see today is artially due to the threat that our species faces. There are those who would rather see nothing done than to have this project carried out.

If it was revealed just how bad things really are, I assure you, the ensuing panic would cause greater damage than the suspicious mumblings that have been heard when it comes to Chem-Trails.

I tell you these things to set the record straight and to impress upon you the need to refrain from causing panic. The threat to humanity is not from the planes spraying overhead, but from the impact that mankind has had on this delicate planet.

Earth is dieing. The program in place is only a stop gap measure. The more dire estimates tell us that the problem is too far advanced to stop ecological disaster. The oceans are dieing, the fresh water supply is depleted, and the very ground in which we grow our crops is yielding up poisons.

Global Warming and UV Summer are the issues that face us today, tomorrow we will be looking at famine, thirst and the spread of disease.

We have forestalled for a few decades the death of our civilization. It is not a cure; it is not the solution. Unless a miracle takes place during the next 20 years, mankind and planet earth will die.

Look back at the past two decades of political history to see the truth of these words. Look at the events as being a result of the threat that humanity faces. When the Soviet Union folded, it did so to the amazement of many Do you honestly think that the Soviet Union folded due to financial problems?

Look at the years of relative peace we have enjoyed, do you think that all of these nations who were once at each other's throat decided to set aside their differences magically?

The fast development of the European Union is another sign of the times. A United Europe has never been possible before, but suddenly it is not only possible, but happening.

A friend

Date:  Mon Dec 2, 2002  2:42 pm

Subject:  More From A Friend - Answer to Questions

I took the Four questions asked from a participant here and I also added a few of my own. I sent off my questions the day before Thanksgiving, Today I got a reply.

 Here it is: 

Having read your email, I must say that you are full of questions.

These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project, however these reports of biological material being part of the spray should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your questions as possible

 1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological material serve in this scenario?

  Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.

  As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes and travel great distances for long periods of time.

Most of the elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not need to spray as often or as much material.

  Since the suspended particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth suppressants - some of which may be of biological material. Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and moisture and mold begins to grow.

 The polymer is stored in a liquid form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has been done which the chemical  matrix in past years. Many polymers (plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of pollution. Various formula have been used,  some which even use biological agents.

  It would be great if we could reproduce the same web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.

   2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so much of it take place at night?  

Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield. There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.

The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one- time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier than air and they sink rather rapidly.

  The different temperatures between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a thin layer. I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of spraying.

I note, it is not just global warming we are combating here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day. This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas.

  If the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.

   3. What other military programs are in place involving the spraying of barium and what are their purposes?

  Do you know and understand the chemical make up of the element? A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need to use barium:  

Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds are poisonous.

  Barium carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is used as a drying agent.  

Barium chloride is used in medicinal preparations and as a water softener.

  Barium sulfide phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the subject.  

Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the chief gasses causing the green house effect.  

In my answer to Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current

in the shield. I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge.

Somewhat like the current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper.

  There are military applications for everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a weapon?  

The same concept holds true here.

   4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails spraying? Or is there one?

  To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution; we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make ozone in the stratosphere.  

 Ozone at ground levels does no good; indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air quality is bad.

  Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure.

Below its boiling point (-112°C) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting point (-193°C) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen.

   It is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light -  0+02. Later, in the presence of a catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.

  Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric discharge method.

  Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.

The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating Ozone where it is needed.

   5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?

  Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.

  We are relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life sustaining conditions on a dieing planet. We have never done this before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods.

  Granted, if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations (or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and permanent injury) is not easy to swallow either.  

Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding material and getting the most out of each application are taking place all the time.

  The combined resources of the nations of earth are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored; the remaining landmasses are more than what can be covered effectively.

  The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.

  6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?

  Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must be maintained.

  Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide, precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in development and testing which may reduce the affects on precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems with it.

 

 

7. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?

  There are several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals - As stated in a pervious email, people will get sick, and some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some degree by the spraying. with out spraying we have a 90% + chance of  becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.

  8. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and One World Order?

  Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes, there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this project:

  European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations. To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia, England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a nation which they have issues with.

  Russian planes may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies - The canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at every station where canister loading is done.

  All of this to insure that the shield is not used as a weapon.

  To further insure that the shield is not used as a weapon, nonparticipant nations are sprayed by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is as much a military offense as shooting at them. Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death.

  The threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.  

9. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?

  Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a population reduction scheme, designed to kill off `undesirable' peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield regardless of the consequences.

  The same delivery method could be used for biological and chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are better methods that can be used.

  As a means to fight terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.

  10. Why all the secrecy?  

Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as possible.

  The Earth is dieing. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could live to see this extinction take place.  

This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down

to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities seeking `safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies.  

We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of survival are small. UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at this time.

  Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to go around.

  Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground water , killed beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the world. 

Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise, any good researcher can find the records.

  For decades there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced.

  Name a city that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before.  

All the clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions did not address the production of more factories and more autos.

  Here an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy was a problem that would have dire effects today.

  All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years.

  Even if we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years.

  However we can not stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every household on the planet.  

Electricity is used to heat many homes in the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark.

It is an impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.

  11. When will spraying stop?

  There are several factors governing this.

  1. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels, spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and 2024.

  2. Should another method be found which is more effective, less costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project would be replaced.

  3. When the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to 2050.

  12. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the Government backing down on its pollution controls?

  Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems than they would solve ecological problems.

  We surpassed the threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's. Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place.

  The world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being unable to do anything to start solving the problems. Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that produces a product has a product development program in place. Many of the past products invented came by accident through other unrelated products.  

There is a corporate drive to find methods to clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been in place for decades, any of the large corporations are on the know when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the problems we face.

  Take away the economy and their research stops.

13. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that this is what is happening?

  I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:

  A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.  

B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.

C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.

D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per individual

E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars - A little math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions, the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the road - Remember that many autos are the road that were built before present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut of date anything put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.  

F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.

G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.  

H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which

political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.

I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.

J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their different webs and threads.

K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's to today - world wide.

L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus borne ID illnesses such as HIV)

Occurrences of Learning disabilities, including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts  

M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.

N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used. Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize, how they combine with nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon ioxide and fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.

O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.  

If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield Project as it really is.

  A friend


 

 

 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Chemtrailpatrol is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, justice issues, corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights and social understanding. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Links