Below is a letter you can fax or email to CA senators and congressmen about setting up a meeting on DE weapons during the week of the October rally in DC. After emailing, follow-up with as many phone calls as necessary to convince the senator/congressmen or his aide to come to the meeting. You can get all congressional info from this website:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
Catch phrases you can use to present your case could be "severe violation of the right to privacy", "threats to national security", "violation of human rights in general", etc. Also see the letter below for how you can present your case.
Thanks and good luck!
Su-Min
Subject: Please contact Congress to help us schedule additional appointments on October 7 about passing laws to regulate electronic weapons and related technology. Legislative assistants are more likely to arrange a meeting to speak with our small group of professionals if the request is from a constituent who lives in their area.
Lawmakers recently agreed to introduce legislation about electronic weapons similar to the ones that are described below. Other politicians usually add amendments to strengthen the original bill.
Dear fellow survivor,
Please copy and paste the following two page letter to Microsoft Word or other program (instead of printing it directly from the internet). We would like for you, your family, and friends to FAX, MAIL and EMAIL the letter to your Representative and two Senators. It should be sent to every federal congressional office in your state. Letters to the Washington D.C. office should be mailed right away because of security screening delays.
The letters should be emailed to multiple staff members. The congressional web sites may allow you to “Please Select A Subject.” Departments that may be interested in regulating electronic weapons are civil rights, crime, defense, foreign relations, government affairs, gun control, homeland security, judiciary, military, open government, schedule a meeting, science, space, technology, terrorism, etc.
The suggested email subject line is: Please schedule a meeting in Washington D.C.
Contact information for your Representative and two Senators is on the following two web sites:
http://www.house.gov/ and
http://www.senate.gov/.
Thanks for assisting us in this important event in Washington D.C.
(Please do not change the following letter. Individual stories should be saved for a later date.)
LETTER
To: The name of your Representative or two Senators (Arial font, size 11)
Date:
Subject: Please schedule an appointment for us to meet with you and other members of Congress in Washington D.C. on Friday, October 7 (or Thursday, October 6 if necessary).
Criminals or terrorists are able to buy and use police or military electronic or electromagnetic weapons. Legislation should be passed that limits the sale, purchase, manufacture, possession or use of electronic or electromagnetic devices or weapons from the internet, mail order, retail or wholesale stores and other sources.
There is a strong indication that criminals are using electronic weapons against innocent civilians, including many patriotic Americans. The weapons could also be used against the police or military. Regulating the availability and use of technology improves national security.
There are thousands of web links on the internet where criminals or terrorists are able to purchase police or military electronic technology. Two of the many weapons that are available for sale are (1) a Taser with a laser sight that works even through bullet proof vests and (2) a stun gun that delivers a 900,000 volt charge.
On August 28, 2005 the Washington Post reported a news story titled “Lightning guns, heat rays, weapons that can make you hear the voice of God. This is what happens when the war on terror meets the entrepreneurial spirit.”
A condensed version of the story states that Pete Bitar is the president of Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems. At a trade show, HE NOTICED THAT FOREIGN MILITARIES WERE THE MOST INTERESTED IN HIS LASER WEAPONS. “IT’S KIND OF WEIRD, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO WEAPONS, YOU’D RATHER ARM YOUR OWN COUNTRY THAN SOMEONE ELSE.” BUT HE SHRUGGED AND ADDED, “A CUSTOMER IS A CUSTOMER.”
Police or military electronic or electromagnetic equipment that is significantly more sophisticated than the weapons listed above are also available for sale from many different sources.
On August 7, 2005, Fox News reported that at least three California men died within the week after they were shot by police with Taser stun guns. The article also stated that more than 140 people nationwide have died after being shot by the device since 2001.
Lawmakers are now being asked to hold hearings to regulate the sale and use of the popular law enforcement tool. The news story can be read at this web site:
http://www.foxreno.com/news/4819610/detail.html
Michigan and Massachusetts already passed laws about the misuse of electronic or electromagnetic devices or weapons. House Enrolled Bills 4513 and 4514 from Michigan took effect on January 1, 2004. The laws provide for a possible life sentence in prison if someone is convicted of using equipment that causes personal injury or death. Bill 4513 section 200h, subsections (k) and (m) (vii), and Bill 4514 section 200i (1), subsection (d), briefly describe harmful electromagnetic devices or weapons. The following two web sites will access the Michigan bills:
http://www.michiganlegislature.org/documents/2003-2004/publicact/htm/2003-PA-0256.htm
http://www.michiganlegislature.org/documents/2003-2004/publicact/htm/2003-PA-0257.htm
Chapters 140 and 170 of the General Laws of Massachusetts took effect on July 15, 2004. The laws address the sale or possession of electrical weapons. The following two web sites will access the Massachusetts bills:
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/140-131j.htm
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm
Scientists around the world develop outstanding technology. If the inventions are used properly, the benefits are positive and peaceful. Unfortunately, some of the electronic equipment that scientists produced was acquired by criminals or terrorists. Dr. John Norseen is a Lockheed Martin neuroengineer. In an interview with a reporter about the misuse of the electronic inventions, Dr. Norseen said, "THE ETHICS DO NOT CONCERN ME, BUT THEY SHOULD CONCERN SOMEONE ELSE." The news story that was titled "Reading your mind and injecting smart thoughts" can be read at this web site:
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/000103/archive_033992.htm
(There may be a short delay while downloading the story.)
Frequently the best tips about criminals or terrorists come from civilians. This information should be a high priority to be investigated by Homeland Security and law enforcement.
We would like to schedule an appointment with you, other members of Congress, and legislative assistants who have expressed an interest in passing laws to investigate and prosecute those who misuse electronic weapons and related technology. Please schedule the meeting in Washington D.C. on Friday, October 7 (or Thursday, October 6 if necessary).
Our small group will include a scientist, Ph.D. and other professionals. One of our experts who worked on counterterrorism issues is a retired FBI Senior Special Agent In Charge. New ideas and intelligence reports will be presented about the misuse of electronic technology, counterterrorism, cyberterrorism, microchips, GPS tracking, and other national security issues.
This important legislation will improve human rights, civil rights, and privacy rights for many Americans. National security is strengthened when the police, military, or defenseless civilians are protected from criminals or terrorists who use electronic or electromagnetic weapons.
To confirm your interest in meeting with us, please contact one of the individuals below.
Dr. L. R. Gillam, President of the Southeastern Christian Association
832-228-3207 or southeastern0@yahoo.com
Ted Gunderson, FBI Senior Special Agent In Charge (Ret)
tedgunderson1@yahoo.com
Your signature
Your name (Arial font, size 11)
Your address
Your phone number
Your email address
P.S. A written response about your views on passing laws to regulate the availability and use of electronic or electromagnetic devices or weapons is appreciated.
