[Masts] FW: WiFi report

Betreff: WiFi report

Von: mastsanity.org

Datum: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:18:43 +0100

Sue Webster was quoted in ICONmag Jan 2003 article

'Sue Webster, a psychotherapist and nutritionist, is the first and only

person to collect evidence from all the 14 UK clusters and visit homes with

an AcousticOM instrument that translates pulsing EMRs into noise. "When I

started out I expected the microwave power levels would be higher in places

where there were a lot of cancers. I have visited hundreds of houses and

found that this is not the case. It's the pulsing that is far more intense

in these houses. My first experience of violent pulsing was in three

Gainsborough houses where four people had cancer. You could hardly hear

yourself speak. These houses were directly opposite and about 100 metres

from a mast which was installed seven years ago with six antennas and two

microwave dishes." There are six other cases of cancer within 200 metres,

including 10 year-old Ryan Petch who has non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and a 30

year old currently in remission from leukaemia.'

i think she might have worked with Dr Walker and SCRAM

I have her e-mail address but she doesn't reply to me

I'll try again

Got this for Michael Meacher

This is an edited version of Michael Meacher's keynote address to the Green

Network Conference, Science, Medicine and the Law, 31 January to 2 February

2005, Royal Institute of British Architecture, London, UK, which will be

published in issue 26 of Science in Society

(www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/sis26.php)

----------

Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 14:14:34 EDT

Subject: Re: WiFi report

Hi again,

On the subject of Barrie's paper, I have had a closer look at the first

half.

Most of the references won't need scanning, they are available online, and

have started compiling them (not all yet, as I'm a bit short of  time)

here are my comments of the first half of the report (up to the heading

"Legal"), just so you know what I would like to discuss with him and why I

feel

some things need to be edited. Please don't get me wrong, this is not meant

to

be overly critical, it is the kind of constructive criticism Sarah and  I

apply to each other's work all the time before it goes out to anyone else.

Once

it's out there it has to hold up to an awful lot of scrutiny...

Kind regards,

Andrea

Barrie Trower Paper Comments:

Page 1:

Prof John Goldsmith passed away in 2002. he is referenced with contact

details as if still available for comment

Iris Atzmon on John Goldsmiths¹ papers

_http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1599006/_

(http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1599006/)

Page 2:

Appendix  1(3) online source :

_http://www.ehponline.org/docs/1997/Suppl-6/toc.html_

(http://www.ehponline.org/docs/1997/Suppl-6/toc.html)

Environmental Health  Perspectives

Who is Sue Webster? A journalist? Can't find out from  the references

Neal Cherry which publication is the quote from? I might be able to find

the link if I knew.

Freiburger Appeal  36990 signatories, amongst those probably 3000  doctors,

consultants and scientists

http://www.igumed.de/apell.html

Comments regarding ³At this time²:

47 cancers (where  internationally or in the  UK?) From the  reference it

looks like they were just in  Spain.

138 cancers (miscarriages)? The illnesses in brackets are not cancers,

are they part of the 138? Not really clear

Wolf and Eger: confusing  since it refers to two different studies but

quoted the authors as if it was one  study. Online sources:

1. Naila 2004  (Eger et al.): http://www.tetrawatch.net/papers/naila.pdf

2. Wolf and Wolf 2004 : _http://omega.twoday.net/stories/518760/_

(http://omega.twoday.net/stories/518760/)

The Prime Minister of Bavaria is Dr Stoiber  He was addressed by this  open

letter, he did not write it: The letter was written by Dr Cornelia

Waldmann-Selsam, who is also the originator of the Bamberger Appeal.

Link for the letter: _http://omega.twoday.net/stories/838705/_

Link for the Bamberger Appeal:

http://www.hese-project.org/de/emf/News/IncomingDocuments/20040716_Aerzteappell_Bamberg.pdf

Hutter: Which study are you referring to? I assume it¹s 2006

Online link: http://www.emf-portal.de/viewer.php?aid=13735&l=e

Page 3:

Idea online: http://www.ideaireland.org/emrresearch.htm

What Nobel prize did they win and when?

Spanish Study  Instead of “they” it would be clearer to say “The authors

of the Spanish Study” recommended a level of radiation 100 million times

below our maximum level. 10 million below ICNIRP. My comment: This is in effect

how  the precautionary value for Salzburg  was set since Gerd Oberfeld, the

director of The Public Health Office in  Salzburg is one of the authors of

the Spanish study.

Canada:  the reference says 3% of Canadians are diagnosed with environmental

sensitivities, not electrosensitivity ( we need to be correct in quoting our

sources otherwise people like Ben Goldacre will eat us alive!)

Page 4:

I would add “epidemiological” to studies, because this is what the

reference refers to

There is also a really good meta study by Henry Lai which could be added  to

strengthen the argument of this section.

Reference 19 (3) Michael Meacher quote: Do you have a date for this Times

article?

--------

MOBILE & CORDLESS PHONES: MICROWAVE MADNESS

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/488067/

Making Waves

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/193822/

http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Sue+Webster