Betreff: Psychological origins of phone mast symptoms - The Psychologist: September 2007, Page 529 |
Von: G. Carlo |
Datum: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:36:28 -0400 |
I find this article in The Psychologist to be offensive to
those who participated in the Essex study as well as to those who suffer from
debilitating electo-sensitivity and other membrane sensitivity syndrome
conditions. It also underscores a serious deficiency in the system that
takes what should be 'reliable' information into the public domain. The
Essex study was seriously flawed as scientific research, and it is a shame that
such a sweeping and unwarranted indictment of the lifestyle and mental state
of seriously ill patients is being made based on that work. It is
indeed a breach of professional responsibility.
I would suggest that whatever responses put into print as context for
interpretation of the Essex study are also targetted to The
Psychologist. It is a serious problem that this misinformation
is continually propagated through collateral professional channels and put out
there as credible. It is important for us to stop those erroneous
communications in their tracks before they gain any momentum.
This misinformation propagated by The Psychologist ironically
will cause deep physical and psychological harm to thousands of afflicted
patients who will now be misdiagnosed and sent into a path of frustration and
spiralling ill health. That this is a preventable consequence makes
this a true tragedy.
Dr. George
L. Carlo
Science and Public Policy Institute
1101 Pennsylvania Ave. NW -- 7th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20004
www.sppionline.org
202-756-7744
-----Original Message-----
From: Margaret E White
Sent: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:26 am
Subject: Psychological origins of phone mast symptoms - The Psychologist:
September 2007, Page 529
I have copied it out [minus photo of mobile phone base
station] Regards, Margaret The Psychologist: September 2007, Page 529 News Psychological origins of phone mast symptoms More evidence has emerged that the unpleasant symptoms
some people report experiencing when close to mobile phone masts and devices
like computers, are not caused by electric fields, and so are more likely to be
of psychological origin. Stacy Eltiti and colleagues at Essex University
exposed 44 self-reported electrosensitive participants and 114 controls to
electromagnetic signals equivalent to those emitted by mobile phone base
stations. The electrosensitive participants , but not the controls , reported
lower well-being and more symptoms when they knew they were being exposed
to the signal compared with a no-signal control. Crucially, however, under
double-blind conditions (i.e. when they didn't know whether the signal
was on or not), none of the participants showed any difference in well-being
and symptoms when exposed to the electromagnetic signal, as compared with a
no-signal control. Writing in Environmental Health Perspectives,
the researchers said that people who think they are electrosensitive generally
have a poor quality of life and that it was 'imperative to determine what
factors' are responsible for their distressing and serious symptoms' (tinyurl.com/28opn).