Betreff: Comment NOW. Protect Mauna Kea
Von: "KAHEA"
Datum: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:26:46 GMT
An: "Klaus Rudolph"

Comment NOW to Protect Mauna Kea
KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance

Comment NOW to Protect Mauna Kea

Aloha Klaus ,

Mauna Kea is profoundly sacred to the Native Hawaiian people. It already supports 24 telescope installations. NASA and the University of Hawai'i want six new telecopes with plans for additonal expansion. The mountains fragile alpine resources have been seriously compromised. The principal aquifer for Hawaii Island is at risk. Enough is enough. KAHEA is calling on everyone to please TAKE ACTION Today to stop any further development on this sacred summit.



Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
Dr. Carl Pilcher

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: No Further Development on Mauna Kea

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

I am writing to express my strong opposition to NASA's proposed development on the summit of Mauna Kea on Hawaii Island. The summit region-- which already supports 24 telescope installations--is profoundly sacred to the Native Hawaiian people. The sanctity of the seriously compromised summit region should not be further violated.

There are many more than approved number of telescopes on the summit now. This project will open the door to even more proposed development on Mauna Kea, including the destruction of an adjacent pristine area near the summit region. This systematic desecration must stop now. I do not support any further development on the summit of Mauna Kea.

In the Draft EIS, NASA admits that the impacts of this and proposed projects to this fragile summit would be, "adverse and significant." It is unacceptable for NASA and the University of Hawai'i to pursue continued degradation of this sacred area.

The potential impacts from further development to the Island's principal aquifer, which lies below the summit region, are unacceptable. In addition the most sacred, Lake Waiau, is at risk of continued desecration.

The rare and imperiled Wekiu bug (a candidate for endangered species designation), is at great risk from being decimated by any further development in the summit region, which is its primary habitat.

The religious significance of the summit region has been seriously damaged by thirty years of unencumbered development. Further desecration of Mauna Kea cannot be tolerated.

NASA's Draft EIS has identified the Canary Islands as a suitable site for the six new telescopes for the Keck Observatory. Please spare the already seriously compromised summit of Mauna Kea and select the acceptable alternative on which to build.

I am opposed to any additional facilities being built on the sacred summit of Mauna Kea.

Sincerely,

Klaus Rudolph

Take Action!

Instructions:
Click here to take action on this issue or choose the "Reply to Sender" option on your email program.


Tell-A-Friend:
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
 Tell-a-Friend!


What's At Stake:
NASA produced a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to assess the environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction of six new telescopes near the twin Keck Telescope Observatory for the Outrigger Telescope Project. NASA was tasked to focus on the cumulative effects of past, current and future activities on the cultural and natural resources on the summit of Mauna Kea. This is the first federal assessment of the impacts of astronomy development on Native Hawaiian culture and the natural resource since it began over 30 years ago. NASA completed the DEIS in a phenomenally short period of time. Unfortunately, the rush job is reflected in the data produced and assessed. The DEIS is fatally flawed and fails in numerous ways to adequately assess the project's impacts to cultural and religious practices or to the natural environment. Cultural sites have been destroyed and according to NASA's own DEIS past and present telescope activities on Mauna Kea have substantially and adversely impacted cultural resources. The DEIS admits that, "future activities on the summit would continue the substantial and adverse impacts on cultural resources." The NASA Draft EIS Cumulative Impact Summary states, "In conclusion, the overall cumulative impact of past, present and reasonably foreseeable future activities is substantial, adverse, and significant." In spite of known cultural degradation of the most sacred area of Hawai'i, the industry wants more. Not just six more telescopes, as proposed by NASA and UH, but there are several proposals for other development on the summit, including a "next generation" telescope. This would be an even larger "world's largest telescope," the thirty-meter telescope. This project is so massive it won't fit on the summit region. They hope to occupy and destroy the adjoining unspoiled northern plateau region. Mauna Kea is a wahi pana (a sacred place) and provides the core foundation of the heritage and sacred traditions of the Native Hawaiian people. It is the place of origins, birthplace of the gods and the point of contact with the spirit world. Many Hawaiian traditions and practices conducted on Mauna Kea can be practiced nowhere else in the world. Mauna Kea is the sacred temple, belonging to Akua, Na Akua, and Na `Au makua. The mountain is the burial ground of the most sacred and revered ancestors of the Hawaiian people. Currently the summit is used routinely for ceremonies and other cultural practices, which pre-date modern science by millennia. This profoundly holy and sacred temple has been developed, paved, bulldozed and occupied by the telescope industry for 30 years. The existing footprint of development extends to over twenty facilities. The original summit contour has been bulldozed and changed forever. The view plane, important for vital religious practices, has been destroyed. The rare and unique native Wekiu bug, a candidate for endangered species designation, has been nearly wiped out. There are significant flaws to the Draft EIS. --It fails to present unbiased science with respect to the Wekiu bug and to the hydrology of the mountain. The data presented is not peer reviewed and omits relevant recent scientific review panel findings. The hydrology information that is presented is grossly deficient. --The Scoping comments are not included in the DEIS, so it is impossible to determine how the DEIS measures up against the factors presented to NASA during the scoping period. --The University of Hawai'i's Master Plan for development on Mauna Kea has not been approved by the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR). The last Management Plan, approved by BLNR in 1983, set the limit on the number of astronomy facilities to thirteen. The BLNR rules expressly require an approved management plan for any facilities and further requires that any amendments to the 1983 plan be approved by the BLNR. This has not occurred. --Despite the fact that the NASA is in the middle of the EIS process, the University of Hawai`i Institute for Astronomy (UHIFA), which administers astronomy activities on the mountain, has concurrently applied for a Conservation District Use Permit on behalf of NASA to begin the construction of the six Outrigger Telescopes. This indicates a severe lack of good faith in the process. --There is no burial treatment plan. The project may not proceed without a plan that has been approved and sanctioned by the Burial Council of Hawai'i. --The 106 Consultation process was rejected by the representatives of the Native Hawaiian organizations involved in the consultation. All but one refused to sign the Memorandum of Agreement. --NASA attempts to dismiss the strong opposition to any further development on the mountain as coming from "a few Hawaiians who do not understand the importance of science." The overwhelming majority of public sentiment expressed in the scoping hearings and in the hearings held on the DEIS came from a broad cross- section of residents and reflected strong opposition to any further development on the mountain. It is very important to recognize that everyone benefits by protecting the integrity of this extremely sacred mountain. Your voice in opposition to further desecration of Mauna Kea will help protect the rights of Indigenous people everywhere.


Campaign Expiration Date:
September 30, 2004


If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for KAHEA:The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance.

This message was sent to Star.Mail@t-online.de. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from KAHEA:The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove" in the subject line).