Betreff:
IoS 22 July 07 |
Von: mastsicknessUK |
Datum: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:35:36 EDT |
|
Below are two small but significant articles.
Personal
Comment
1. The Royal Commission
on Environmental Pollution needs
feed
back from the public on what topic to investigate.
If
we want these pulsed microwave radiation technologies
to be investigated
then we need to try to spread the word.
http://www.rcep.
2.
The Chairman of the HPA wants and inquiry into Wi-Fi in
schools, yet the HPA is not for moving and does not answer
letters anymore. (I have recently sent one and have not had a
reply to date and others tell me their letters are not replied to either.)
What organisation
ignores the inclinations of its Chairman?
It appears that the HPA
does and this gives the impression that the
HPA is not
concerned about our children’s health and wellbeing.
Perhaps we need to tell
our MPs that it does matter to us!
Sandi - MastSickness UK
The Independent on
Page 22: Wi-Fi fears to
be investigated
by Geoffrey Lean
Environment Editor
looking into radiation
from mobile phones and their masts,
Wi-Fi networks and
electric power lines following articles in the
Independent on Sunday.
The Royal Commission on
Environmental Pollution – an independent
group of experts – has
short listed the issue for its next study.
In April this newspaper
exclusively reported that Sir William Stewart,
the Chairman of the
Health Protection Agency, wanted an inquiry into
the use of Wi-Fi in
schools, voicing concerns that were followed up
by BBC’s Panorama.
“The electromagnetic
environment” is one of seven topics listed –
which also includes
“noise pollution”, “water management” and
“plastics and the
environment”.
Sir John Lawton, who
chairs the royal commission, says that
“any one of
these topics could make a worthwhile study”
and is asking for the
public’s views to help make a decision.
Page 45: Letters, Emails &
texts
Neither the public nor
their elected representatives at local level
are persuaded by
official reassurances over Wi-Fi (“Council
urges caution on school Wi-Fi”,
15 July).
The situation is not
helped by contradictory messages from the
watchdog.
Dr Michael Clark, of the
Health Protection Agency, has said we
are “all guinea pigs
in some global multibillion-
experiment”.
I wrote some weeks ago
to ask Dr Clark whether the HPA agrees
with the nation’s
children becoming the youngest, arguably the
most vulnerable and
probably the most exposed guinea pigs in
that experiment. I
have yet to receive a reply.
On behalf of the
millions of kids and their parents I’d like to ask
Mike Clark, through the
pages of your newspaper: please could I
have an answer to my
letter?
Dr Grahame Blackwell