Comment:
Let us not get intimidated by fear, i.e. let us simply not get
terrorized.
Truthful information, strong bonds with your tribe of family and
friends
and the heart to get the dreadful source of fear by the balls is the
best
remedy. Most people are more frightened than hurt, but become
seriously affected or injured when allowing fear to take a grip.
“It is the coming of death that terrifies me”, said Oscar Wilde. So
what ?!
If you made peace with your own destiny, no intimidation - whatsoever -
can have an effect on you, which would cause the (intended) panic and
implies sudden frantic fear that often
impairs self-control and rationality.
Let us stay rational,
fight for 100% self-control and get the bastards
by the balls! Every day - every second!
Don't give in !!!
----------------------------
Frightening times
Dear everyone,
Unfortunately the man described by his former Japanese teacher at HLS
as a “pathological liar” and weak character seems to be wining the
elections, and he might soon start a couple of new wars.
He clearly lost the televised debates against Kerry, despite being
remote controlled, tutored and whispered by his advisors during the
debates. As usual he lied about it (see Kevin Berger: “NASA Photo
Analyst: Bush Wore a Device During Debate”, at http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/ ). Despite remote control the Bush camp was on the brink
of loosing.
As expected, the 11th hour sort of thing happened. It is the
Bin Laden video--released four days before the counting of the vote
starts--that will help him to win. Be it the old friendship between the
Bush and Bin Laden families that doesn’t rust easily or the belief of
some observers that Bin Laden remains one of the most valuable assets
of the CIA, who knows.
Why will Bush win? Chiefly because the US voters trust him more to win the “war on terror” (a
misnomer and false strategy). This seems odd taken the very fact that
Bin Laden has not been brought to justice, “dead or alive” as Bush
promised three years ago, after 9-11.
The result of the first Bush presidency does not support the voters’
belief: Bush’s “war on terror”, which is in reality a war for oil in Iraq (predated by a military advance to the borders of China and the former USSR in Afghanistan), has resulted in the most effective spread of terrorism
in recent times. Remember, we are talking about US-made terrorism.
Modern Islamists terrorism exists since Brzezinski convinced Carter
(the peace angel) to fund and facilitate the building-up of al-Qaeda
and the training of ten thousands of Mujaheddin, future terrorists (as
Rashid convincingly disclosed), in order to undermine the USSR and
China--for which Brzezinski has credited himself, when he was a little
tipsy in Paris some years ago. Bush’s remote-controlling advisors are
eager to beat Brzezinski’s record and create havoc in even more
countries.
Bush might win because reality doesn’t count for US voters, especially
for Bush voters. 75% of those still believe that Saddam had WMD and
relations with al-Qaeda; despite all inquires that proved that the Iraq war was started under false pretences.
The Bush gang the most serious threat to world peace since the end of
the Cold War. This small power elite is both, a relative novelty and
aberration. It is the result of an unholy alliance of extremists, the
‘born-again’ Christian fundamentalist hard right combined with
Lukidists (radical Zionists) and neo-conservatives (PNAC). They are
accountable to no one but “chosen by God”. The gang, less than a dozen
of “advisors” and officials, decided to invade Iraq. It soon turned into a nightmare. They will increase the
troops in Iraq, soon after the US elections, assault Fallujah and other no-go areas, but
it won’t help them.
The gang will have ample time to continue bulling other nations,
invading resource rich countries and tearing down all rules of
civilized international behaviour--until January 2009, if they don’t go
nuclear and start World War III.
Frightening times in the fore!
CP Scherrer
-----------------
ECOTERRA Intl.