1.
Evidence this year (2005) of damage to human health and
families being driven from their homes by the damage to health from base
station emissions. Received by Gill Lyden
Dear (Deleted for Data protection), Luton.
We do not live there
anymore. In the end we had to abandon our home (and place of work, means we
were there 24 hours a day/7 days/week, 365 days/year )
The house is still standing empty 1½ years later. Why I wonder.
I still miss my house
awfully. But we did get lots of
measurements on the Com monitor. With the mast only 28 meters away, our Com
monitor lit up like a Xmas tree. (see attached photo,
all lights are lit to the top of the scale). (Sorry.I do not have the photo. G.Lyden)
But the thing is that
UMTS is a Sinister thing.
It is not the deadly silent radiation of GSM. It is very noisy indeed and probably even more deadly than GSM. I first found out about the noise when they
shut the mast down for repairs on the 180804 and then again on the 010904. It
was like coming into the “EYE” of a Tornado, suddenly it was totally quiet
after the raging storm.
Erik measured and there was
no radiation. And then suddenly it all started again, and I felt physically
that they had turned it on again, Erik measured and it was on again.
But the worst thing is,
that we made a lot of effort to shield for the radiation, and managed to shield
it away, but still, sitting in the spots where the beams came into the house we
fainted and lost consciousness. There is still a big mark in the carpet of our
TV room where my hot iron fell on the floor and melted the carpet fibre. We were very lucky that the carpet did not ignite
and burn the house down, because we only came to quite a while later, and the room was full of fumes from the melted carpet.
I have never been so scared
in my whole life.
Dr. Gerald Hyland went into
the house just before our case came to court and measured with his Acousticom, and he said that he had never heard the Acousticom screech like this before. It was the highest
reading he had ever had.
Best regards. Agnes.
P.S. I have now moved
us to a place almost at the top of the “Mountain”
-----Original
Message-----From: (deleted for Data protection) On Behalf Of Mobile
Phone Mast Campaigners Networking Email List
Sent:
Subject: Re: [Mast Network] Zamir tested various window films
hi Agnes I read with
interest your efforts to reduce levels of radiation in your home. I understand
that you also use a com monitor as the basis for measuring relative
levels of radiation in your home.
I have a com
monitor and used it in the past and found that its lowest reading of 0.7
volts per metre is not sensitive enough for the purposes
of effective radiation reduction. In the end our group was
fortunate enough to acquire a very sensitive home built acousticom type that is
frequency selective.to use in our quest for reduced radiation exposures. We
were able to assess the radiation levels of each different
frequency present and deal with each frequency in turn.
2
At least 2
serious studies ( one was pulsed and the other was non
pulsed) indicate health effects at levels as low as 0.3 volts per metre
and as that level might not register on the com monitor you might still have
such levels of radiation in your home that might
be bio interactive.
2
We have
experimented with progressive shielding for some years now and are
familiar with the immense technical challenge of keeping radiation away
from people and have found that as the level of exposure is progressively
lowered to the point that our very sensitive acousticom type
meter does not register emissions that the health of the exposed subjects
seems to progressively improve. Well being is a subjective factor and the
criteria for assessing well being is productivity, earnings, days off
work, looking after grandchildren, energy for home improvement projects
gardening visits to doctors etc.
Perhaps you might need to
get more sensitive instruments and go over your home and see if there might
still be radiation leaking in despite your recent efforts.
best wishes
(Deleted for Data protection)
----- Original Message -----
To: “ “ “ Sent: Subject: Re: [Mast Network] Zamir tested various window films Zamir. Did you
by any chance check it against UMTS or Tetra rays? When we put alu-foil and
steel netting on the inside of all our walls, and lead curtain netting before
the windows, our com monitor did not measure radiation, but we still got sick,
in the same spots as we had measured the radiation in. So we think it must have
been the frequencies. There is
something deeply sinister about the frequencies UMTS sends out, and the worst
part is that is very much worse when there is no traffic on the net. We had
thought it was because of heavy traffic, but found out the hard way, it was the
opposite. Can it be that the traffic disguises the pulsing when there is traffic,
but when there is no traffic the pulsing is undisguised and the frequency beams
really get into you. It got so bad we fainted. I am going to send you a letter my son Henrik
has sent me. He has been working hard to find an explanation why, UMTS is so
terrible. He is reading material on Radiation protection for Mobile phones from
a manufacturer of the protection chip and tells me there is a lot in there to
explain the reason for the effects on
people. Best
regards. Agnes