The truth is seeping out all over!!! Read the article below by San Francisco
Chronicle columnist Mark Morford and you will see an amazing example of this.
The Chronicle is one of the 12 largest circulation newspapers in the nation.
Morford's article on Oct. 27th links to several very important websites which
expose major cover-ups in a very big way. And take a look at any of these links
for more that's just recently come out:
http://hillsenatenow.org/media/WPTZ_040902_medium.mov - Vermont's
Green Party candidate for US Senate, Craig Hill, charges on a major TV station that the
administration allowed 9/11 to happen!
http://www.latimes.com/news/yahoo/la-na-cia20oct20,1,2601757.story - The Los
Angeles Times reports that a CIA 9/11 report which is being withheld from
publication seeks accountability of individuals in the CIA for the 9/11 attacks.
http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:X7dQdi4-zhgJ:www.boulderweekly.com/covers
tory.html+boulder+weekly+9/11&hl=en&start=1 - Deep information on the 9/11
cover-up was reported in a long article on the front page of last week's Boulder
Weekly! (The above link is to Google's cache, as the story has been replaced
by this week's lead story on their website).
http://www.gnn.tv/content/viewer.html - Eminem is one of the very top
hip-hop stars of the young generation. Though filled with a lot of anger, an
Eminem song and video called Mosh has "Bush knew" plastered on the walls, shows
Bin Laden with a smiling Cheney over his shoulder, and calls on people to vote. If
you go to http://www.mtv.com/ and click on the "Video" button under "Hot 5",
you will see that this is currently the number 1 video on MTV!!!
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/10033802.htm - Philadelphia's
second largest newspaper the Philadelphia Daily News reports: "Two men who
worked extensively in the wreckage of the World Trade Center claim they helped
federal agents find three of the four "black boxes" from the jetliners that
struck the towers on 9/11 - contradicting the official account." The article
suggests a big cover-up. A longer version of this same article with valuable links
added is posted at http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/archives/001139.html
Also, James Walter, a wealthy philanthropist has placed several large ads in
prominent publications claiming a major 9/11 cover-up. On Sept. 17th he placed
a full page ad in the New York Times. He placed a similar ad in Newsweek on
9/20. Then on Oct. 23rd he placed another full page in the New York Times on
page 5, with a banner stating that 66% of New Yorkers think that the 9/11
Investigation should be reopened 49% believe U.S. leaders "consciously failed to
act" to prevent 9/11 as reported by the Zogby/Reuters poll.
These are major breakthroughs! We are slowly building towards critical mass.
For more reliable, verifiable information on the 9-11 cover-up, see
www.WantToKnow.info/9-11cover-up10pg. And don't miss the amazing article below! Thank
you for helping to spread this important news and you have a great day and
weekend ahead.
With very best wishes,
Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info team
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2004/10/27/notes102704.DTL&nl=fix
Write More About Skull & Bones
Secret societies? UFOs? The truth about what *really* happened on 9/11? The
media cowers
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
I get this a lot:
Hey Mark, you're a rather weird, unconventional columnist, why don't you quit
toeing the typical blasé journalism line and renounce the
corporate-controlled news feeds and standard pop-culture drivel and instead write about the real
truths, the real and sinister power structures at work in America and the
world?
Like for example how both Kerry and Bush are members of mega-yuppie Yale
secret society/boys' club Skull & Bones, and therefore suckle at the same tit of
nefarious primeval Illuminati power and draw their ideas from same trough of
covert draconian ideology, the one that is right now running the world via an
insanely intricate network of corporate fronts and Swiss bank accounts and
invisible spaceships and ancient cabals featuring really elaborate handshakes that
would make "The Da Vinci Code" seem like a day at the sandbox? Hmm?
And why, furthermore, don't you talk about the real truths of 9/11? Like how
BushCo not only allowed the tragedy to occur to further his administration's
snarling agenda but also how he actually made it happen, signed the order
himself, with the full and complicit cooperation of the FBI and the CIA and the
Saudis and maybe even Enron and the Wal-Mart heirs and probably the Olsen twins.
And by the way did you know the planes that crashed into the WTC were fully
radio controlled? And Dick Cheney was commanding the entire thing from the
ground and they had been rehearsing the attack for months and it was all part of a
master plan decades in the making and by the way what about the Pentagon?
Haven't you seen that amazing video on that Web site? Those incredible and
damning photos? Noticed the weird cover-up? That wasn't no 747 that crashed into
the Pentagon on 9/11, buddy. Look a little closer. See? And what about
Building 7? Why did that 47-story tower adjacent to the WTC collapse when it had no
fire and no plane crash and no reason to fall? Why isn't the media reporting
any of this? Where is the outrage? Goddamn frightening, is what it is.
This is what they say. Mark, don't be a typical media lackey, avoiding the
real truth in favor of safe, predigested corporate news tripe. What are you,
scared? Repressed? I mean, who cares about the price of raw sweet crude or
rampant overfishing when there's astounding crop-circle phenomena and suspicious Air
Force inactivity and grainy aerial photos from Area 51 to stare at with a
magnifying glass and huge doses of mistrust?
Does this make you laugh? Scoff? It is, after all, incredibly easy to dismiss
conspiracy theories as ranty silly unproven wishful thinking wrought by
desperately lonely fatalists and nutballs and geeks, fringe kooks ever reaching for
some eternally just-out-of-reach meta-explanation, some sort of proof of
massive cover-up and of the existence of a very real Matrix, and it's all best
explained by the mad brilliance of the books of David Icke.
But you know what? It's not that easy. And it ain't so silly. These people,
they have a point. They are indeed onto something quite large and ominous and
it very much has to do with the media toeing the line of "safe" information and
not really asking truly difficult or radically off-track questions of our
leaders or of the strangeness happening in the world. Reptilian super-races from
the fifth dimension walking among us and secretly mind controlling your child
via MSG and fluoridated water? OK, maybe not. But look just a little deeper.
After all, there is indeed ample evidence that the U.S. government, long
before 9/11, had already discussed the quite plausible possibilities and strategic
benefits of unleashing a "Pearl Harbor"-type event on America for the
purposes of creating havoc and fear and furthering certain agendas. This much is a
given. And it's just the tip of the iceberg.
Look. There are plenty of strangely unanswered questions about 9/11, about
the stunning inaction of NORAD and Bush's stupefying nonreaction upon hearing of
the attack, not to mention his administration's incredible attempts to halt
any independent 9/11 investigations, and have you ever read a fully satisfying
account of how this whole atrocity could have happened, one that answered all
your questions and quelled your lingering doubts and squashed, once and for
all, any hints of dread you had about our government's potential role in the
tragedy? Neither have I. Neither has anyone.
Of course, no one in any major media will touch this stuff. It is
professional suicide to dare suggest an alternate truth to the one supplied by the
Pentagon and regurgitated by the media, despite the fact that most every journalist,
trained as they are to be suspicious and wary and fully cognizant of the fact
that there is always more to a given apocalypse than meets the eye, every
journalist knows that buried just beneath the slippery surface of any good
conspiracy theory is a gem or three of real truth, a question that begs to be solved
or at least researched and, yet, most likely never will, because it has been
cast into the madhouse of "outrageous" impossibility and is therefore rendered
impotent and hopeless.
Look at it this way. Much of the world believes in UFOs. Or ghosts. Or
telekinesis. Or past lives. Or alternate realities. Or the paranormal. Or all of the
above. Most of us fully intuit that we are not the center of the universe and
that it's rather narcissistic and outrageously arrogant of us to think we
are. Whether or not this means shiny blinking flying saucers and androgynous
Gumby-like aliens with almond-shaped eyes is beside the point; most sentient
bipedal creatures know there is more to all of this than just puny and egotistical
little us.
And yet, go ahead and try to get any serious public figure or mainstream
pundit to openly admit this belief, this fact, in public. Try to find more than a
glossy and supercilious feature in, say, Time magazine (i.e., "UFOs: Gosh, are
they really here?") Won't happen, so surrounded are such topics in hokum and
wide-eyed ranting and fringe intellectual cheese.
The world of conspiracy theories, it is like a zoo. It is like a black hole.
It is the place we as a culture toss ideas that don't fit quite right, that
unsettle and disturb and cause us to shudder and shake off the queasy feeling.
And it is the place the Powers That Be will toss any sinister and dark
questions about their behavior, safe in the knowledge that anyone who goes to look
for the answer will have to dive into that gnarled world and will look foolish
and silly and will be probably be laughed off the stage.
Sometimes it's all you -- or I -- can do to hint at the existence of these
radical notions and illuminate the frightening possibilities and scream into the
Void, hoping to agitate and inform and inspire while still covering your
professional butt. A copout? Maybe. But then again, if there's an alternative, I
have yet to find it.
And the truth is, we don't really want such unstable questions answered. We
simply cannot tolerate to have our world, our leaders, our foundations so
questioned. We prefer stasis to growth, security to true knowledge, blind faith to
chaotic sticky self-defined wonder.
After all, once you allow the real possibility of UFOs or psychic healing or
crop-circle phenomena or the notion that we could very well have a hugely
malicious, criminal U.S. government capable of pulling a 9/11 on its own citizens,
well, the happy capitalistic all-American Christian world begins to implode.
Foundations crumble. Trust in our institutions vanishes. Gods fall and
doctrines crumble and televangelists spontaneously combust and everyone starts
reimagining the social order in ways that absolutely terrify those who now hold the
reins.
Real truth, after all, often means anarchy, disorder, revolution. And God
knows we can't have that.