Betreff: New Archive of Deep Insider Email and More Elections Info
Von: "WantToKnow.info"
Datum: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:47:03 -0800
An: "Undisclosed Recipients"


 
I've just finished creating an Internet archive of all of the best emails sent out to the Deep Insider list since it began last April. I've also included the best emails sent out to my previous list which started in early 2003. This new archive contains a powerful compilation of information from reliable sources which can be verified by using the links provided. Anyone who reads through some of these highly informative emails cannot help but see that there is a huge amount of vital information being hidden from the public. It is truly sad that the vast majority of people are aware of almost none of the important information collected in these emails. I invite you to take a look at http://www.WantToKnow.info/coveruparchive
 
The messages in the archive are arranged both by topic and by date sent. Each email is given a one sentence description followed by a link to the entire message. Just reading through the list will educate you as to what is happening in a variety of areas that is being hidden from public view. Three asterisks are placed in front of the articles you don't want to miss. I welcome any thoughts or suggestions you might have on this new archive. I also want to express sincere gratitude to all who have sent in reliable stories for bringing to light information which is being hidden from the public. Don't miss the section on inspirational messages, too, as a break from the intensity of the cover-ups.
 
Since sending out the last email on the elections cover-up, I've received a good number of additional excellent media articles. I have updated the last elections summary on the archive with these new additions. Not included in the elections summary, but something some of you may not know is that recounts are brewing in both Ohio and New Hampshire. The alternative media has been covering this important development very closely. Yet in the mainstream press, it is getting remarkably little coverage, though it has been mentioned in a couple major papers buried among other news:
 
Washington Post (half way through the article) - "A couple of minor-party presidential candidates hope to have a major impact on the ongoing vote count in Ohio. Green Party nominee David Cobb and Libertarian Michael Badnarik said last week that they want a recount of the state's presidential vote -- and are willing to pay to force it."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48363-2004Nov13.html
 
Boston Globe (very short newsclip) - "A recount requested by independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader in some New Hampshire towns is scheduled to resume Monday. Nader paid $2,000 to start a recount of 11 of the state's 126 precincts that use optical vote-scanner machines after an analysis showed wide differences in voting trends between the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections."
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/nader/articles/2004/11/24/ralph_nader_requested_recount_to_resume_monday/
 
Below is a list of the additions which I have not previously sent out to this list, but which are now included in the compilation at the link given below. Take care and have a great holiday season!
 
With best wishes,
Fred
 
You can find all of the below additions and more in the  elections summary at:
www.WantToKnow.info/coveruparchive#electionsproblems
 

Salt Lake Tribune - Voters in Utah County had more than a one in five chance that their ballots did not get counted in the initial, unofficial tally from Election Day. A programming glitch in the punch-card counter dropped 33,000 ballots from the totals - all of them straight-party ballots. That was more than 22 percent of the 145,769 ballots cast in the Republican stronghold.
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_2453243

New York Times - When Maryland decided to buy voting machines, the state commissioned a staged attack in which computer experts would try to interfere with an election. They were disturbingly successful. It was an ''easy matter,' to reprogram the access cards and vote multiple times. By using a modem, they were able to change votes from a remote location. Diebold, the machines' manufacturer, issued a self-congratulatory press release with the headline ''Maryland Security Study Validates Diebold Election Systems Equipment.'' The study's authors were shocked to see their findings spun so positively.
http://www.WantToKnow.info/040131nytimes

MSNBC - Click below to watch 16 minutes of the excellent MSNBC news program broadcast nationally on November 11th covering this topic. Note that it may take several minutes to download. You must have installed either QuickTime (QT) or Windows Media. For dial-up connections, use the 56K option.
http://websrvr20.audiovideoweb.com/avwebdswebsrvr2143/news_video/5.countdown_300k.mov (QT high speed)
http://websrvr20.audiovideoweb.com/avwebdswebsrvr2143/news_video/5.countdown_56k.mov (QT 56K)
http://win20ca.audiovideoweb.com/ca20win15004/5.countdown_300k.wmv  (Windows Media high speed)
http://win20ca.audiovideoweb.com/ca20win15004/5.countdown_56k.wmv  (Windows Media 56K)

Associated Press/Los Angeles Times - “A hand recount of ballots cast using optical scanning technology gave a Democrat enough extra votes to bump a Republican from victory in a county commissioner's race. The erroneous tally was caused when the Fidlar Election Co. scanning system recorded straight-Democratic Party votes as votes for Libertarians in southeastern Indiana's Franklin County.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-election-glitch,1,1846959.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

UPI – “In Baker County, Fla….there are 12,887 registered voters: 69.3 percent are Democrats, 24.3 percent are Republicans. Yet 2,180 of county residents voted for Kerry while 7,738 voted for Bush -- the opposite of what some election critics say was the typically pattern elsewhere in the United States. In Florida's Dixie County….77.5 percent of the 4,988 registered voters are Democrats, 15 percent are Republicans. On Election Day, Bush carried the county with 4,433 votes vs. 1,959 for Kerry. Nationally, few outlets have pursued the story of what happened in Baker and Dixie.”
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20041112-010916-6128r

Los Angeles Times - “Officials in Franklin County — which includes state capital Columbus — acknowledged that they may have improperly counted votes for Bush because of a touch-screen voting system malfunction. A precinct in the county reported that a 4,000-vote margin won by Bush appeared to exceed the number of registered voters.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-ohio9nov09,1,6521794.story

Wyoming Secretary of State’s Website – According to the official website of the Secretary of State, the state of Wyoming produced a strange miracle by turning out 106% of registered voters for the 2004 elections! The percentage of registered voters who turn out to vote has been rising rapidly over the last 10 years. Could this have anything to do with the increase in electronic voting machines and the accompanying increased ease of elections fraud?
http://soswy.state.wy.us/election/profile.htm

We invite you to visit websites covering the elections mess. Many of these elections websites provide practical ideas on actions you can take. Two of the best such websites are:

http://www.blackboxvoting.org
http://www.votescam.com 

We also highly recommend the excellent 30-minute documentary available for free viewing at http://www.votergate.tv (though the download may take over 10 minutes). And if you haven't seen our first posting on this topic, take a look at http://www.wanttoknow.info/electronicvoting  It is well worth reading.


Note: Don't forget to take a look at the excellent compilation of all our previous emails in our new archive at:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/coveruparchive